Based on the specs being 27.4 inches 11.0 oz strung, I was expecting a more playable & powerful Pro # 1 original. What I found was the racquet had less power, less stability, poor feel, and no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
It is too light & unstable for a players racquet, and too little power for a tweener, who is this racquet made for?
Fischer is hurting it's reputation by becoming (gammatized recommending gamma strings at tensions that are unplayable for fischer ie- 50-70 lbs)
and staying in the dark ages by not allowing thier racquets to be sold via internet, it is hard to get accurate racquet specs on thier stuff.
But if you could put up with that traditionally they made a great product ie- Pro #1 original arguably one of the best racquets ever made. But now even thier products have fallen off, do they play test these?
I hope they are making good ski's cause thier new racquets stink.
Finally has anyone hit with the Pro # 1 FT and like it?
It is too light & unstable for a players racquet, and too little power for a tweener, who is this racquet made for?
Fischer is hurting it's reputation by becoming (gammatized recommending gamma strings at tensions that are unplayable for fischer ie- 50-70 lbs)
and staying in the dark ages by not allowing thier racquets to be sold via internet, it is hard to get accurate racquet specs on thier stuff.
But if you could put up with that traditionally they made a great product ie- Pro #1 original arguably one of the best racquets ever made. But now even thier products have fallen off, do they play test these?
I hope they are making good ski's cause thier new racquets stink.
Finally has anyone hit with the Pro # 1 FT and like it?