I want to hit against an ATP100 for 30 mins.

I hit with Mark Philippoussis back in like 2010 for a solid hour. I’m in that weird 4.0-4.5 range where I have my moments.
Let me tell you, it’s a humbling experience. The pace and weight of the ball is something I hadn’t seen before. Caught me off guard. What truly blew me away was how he hit that pace and weight every single time, not like the 2 out of 10 that my normal partners hit. It was every time.
Returning serve, well that’s whole other story, next to impossible.

Your best bet is to find a player who is retired, if you’re searching for current you’d probably have to go to a challenger tourney and hit up the practice courts and start flashing your money.

That is what a lot of top pros used to say!

:p
 

Windsor

Rookie
In my town there's a Future 10000 and one Open with 5000 prize. Winners are usually top 300 Atp. Many of the younger guys who play in these competitions, especially those who reach semis and finals, sooner or later crack the top 100. I bet you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between them and a top 100 as they can hit pretty hard and consistently so. A Future 10000 winner earns only 1000 for a week of work as the total amount includes the whole prize money and not just for the winner. Moral of the story, if you go watch a Future nearby where you live and ask a top 300 player, I bet he would be more than happy to accept your offer.
 

pennc94

Professional
If you can swing it, great but as others have said the interest will not be there without big bucks. You also won’t get the full experience as they wouldn’t take it out of first gear.

I hit with Bjorn Borg back in 1996 in the Bahamas. He had an arrangement with a resort to hit with guests. I was still young at the time and I gave it my best. It looked like we were playing two different sports. Amazing. After my turn was done, I went over to his side of the court to let another guest hit with him. He reaches out to shake my hand and says “Hello I’m Bjorn”.

On another occasion at Saddlebrook my pro hit with my group. You could tell he wasn’t going all out. We asked him to play for real. He did. It was unlike anything I’ve seen before. We couldn’t even touch the ball. He peaked top 400 about 8 years before this took place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
So a 5.0 in Umag is 150ATP like a 6.0 in Toronto is 150ATP?

J

I don’t know. NTRP is not exactly a good measure of skill when it comes to global completion.

Basically your rating is determined by whom you compete with. The Philippines national #1 for example has been #1 for over a decade - he doesn’t even bother leaving the country anymore because it’s too much struggle.

Using the NTRP metric, because he only competes in Philippines, he would be a 5.5? 6.0? Something like that. But easily a 5.0 in Taiwan, maybe even a 4.5 in Serbia would win.

Can’t speak about national competitiveness. Some countries have a very high level of local competition, others don’t have the infrastructure for tennis.
 

Demented

Semi-Pro
It's really not that hard to find someone who can hit a rally ball 70 mph with 2000 rpm of spin at you. Pro ground strokes and serves are only about 20% harder than 3.5 level strokes but the main difference is consistency, accuracy and stamina. I played a 4.0 this weekend who hit a 112 mph ace down the T on me... only 3-4% slower than a Fed ace... I didn't have to pay him to do it either....
 

mental midget

Hall of Fame
go to a legends event, i think they have a premium package where you can tool around a bit with them for around 1-2k or so. the younger guys are certainly good enough to hold their own currently against lower tier pros.
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
I don’t know. NTRP is not exactly a good measure of skill when it comes to global completion.

Basically your rating is determined by whom you compete with. The Philippines national #1 for example has been #1 for over a decade - he doesn’t even bother leaving the country anymore because it’s too much struggle.

Using the NTRP metric, because he only competes in Philippines, he would be a 5.5? 6.0? Something like that. But easily a 5.0 in Taiwan, maybe even a 4.5 in Serbia would win.

Can’t speak about national competitiveness. Some countries have a very high level of local competition, others don’t have the infrastructure for tennis.

Croatia has 4 players in the top 200, Canada has 6 so I'm just not following what you are trying to say.

J
 

Adv. Edberg

Legend
go to a futures/challengers tourney...
ask the losing pro if they want to make $x/hr to just hit
probably will be atp300-500

go to us open qualies, do the same
probably will be atp200

go to us open quallies, to a practice court (eg. i've seen fed/goffin, nadal/cueva, etc... courside, like 5-10ft from me, and ask <insert pro player> if you can pay them $3k to hit for 30m
probably will be atp100

tell me when you go, i'll document/record :)


There are plenty of top 100 who play challengers so best bet would be that.
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
I don’t know. NTRP is not exactly a good measure of skill when it comes to global completion.

Basically your rating is determined by whom you compete with. The Philippines national #1 for example has been #1 for over a decade - he doesn’t even bother leaving the country anymore because it’s too much struggle.

Using the NTRP metric, because he only competes in Philippines, he would be a 5.5? 6.0? Something like that. But easily a 5.0 in Taiwan, maybe even a 4.5 in Serbia would win.

Can’t speak about national competitiveness. Some countries have a very high level of local competition, others don’t have the infrastructure for tennis.


Croatia has 4 players in the top 200, Canada has 6 so I'm just not following what you are trying to say.

J

I’m saying NTRP isn’t the be all and end all measure of tennis talent.

It might well be Canada has more players in the top 200 than Croatia.

I’m talking about NTRP ratings and that across the globe the same rating may not equate to the same level of talent.

It isn’t a static measure, it’s a relative one.


H
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
I’m saying NTRP isn’t the be all and end all measure of tennis talent.

It might well be Canada has more players in the top 200 than Croatia.

I’m talking about NTRP ratings and that across the globe the same rating may not equate to the same level of talent.

It isn’t a static measure, it’s a relative one.


H

NTRP is only a US thing. Every country has its own version I guess.

It's not meant to be, it's just a bunch of categories for adult recreational tennis. 5.0 has a huge span of players from good club players to futures level players. There are 5.0s who would be lucky to win a few games off of me in singles and 5.0s who could bagel me.

UTR is attempting to do what you are talking about but it's not working well so far.

J
 
D

Deleted member 742196

Guest
NTRP is only a US thing. Every country has its own version I guess.

It's not meant to be, it's just a bunch of categories for adult recreational tennis. 5.0 has a huge span of players from good club players to futures level players. There are 5.0s who would be lucky to win a few games off of me in singles and 5.0s who could bagel me.

UTR is attempting to do what you are talking about but it's not working well so far.

J

Yep, I’ve had the same experience. Here in Croatia I’m getting creamed left, right and centre. It’s laughable.

Over at the rec level in Canada [Toronto] supposedly I’m a strong 4.5 and I can’t get anywhere here.

Today a guy made me hit 6 goddamned successive overheads. On the seventh I botched it and he had a wry smile as if to tell me to go back to my country.

Have lost 8 straight sets in Umag.

When the OP talks about hitting against pro level talent my response is go to a competitive environment to see what it’s like first.
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
Yep, I’ve had the same experience. Here in Croatia I’m getting creamed left, right and centre. It’s laughable.

Over at the rec level in Canada [Toronto] supposedly I’m a strong 4.5 and I can’t get anywhere here.

Today a guy made me hit 6 goddamned successive overheads. On the seventh I botched it and he had a wry smile as if to tell me to go back to my country.

Have lost 8 straight sets in Umag.

When the OP talks about hitting against pro level talent my response is go to a competitive environment to see what it’s like first.

I offered to hit with him and video him trying to hit the ball back.

J
 
D

Deleted member 23235

Guest
If I did this, I would actually train for this session.
I would move beyond the 4.0 caliber hitting I am used to.

I would do 3 rally only sessions with @nytennisaddict 4.5,
then a 5.0, then the 5.5 ....2 weeks (mostly hit right to me)

Then I would strap a goPro on my head and crash the US Open qualies with $3k in my pocket,
and I would tell him to hit through me.

Of course, I would want to negotiate the price,
so I would have $1k in 3 different pockets.

3f5f88b4ca35b541b653071d99ddad6c.jpg
had another thought...
with $3k, make a travel vac to somewhere, and pay/play the upcoming pros of a smallish country (serbia? croatia?) i bet the $ would go far..
 

Devilito

Hall of Fame
profession tennis is a money losing venture for anyone outside the top 100. There are plenty of players with atp rankings around 200-500 that could and have beaten top 100 players at some point. Most of these players will do anything for extra cash. Most of them already do private hits on the side for money. I would say it would be extremely easy to find someone in that range that would love to take your $200 for a 1 hour hit.
 

li0scc0

Hall of Fame
I used to hit, on occasion, with a Challenger tour player. Big kid (6'5") with a massive serve (clocked just under 140 mph) and forehand.
The most troubling part was return of serve. Unreturnable. I could keep up with him in rallies, which is why his coach/dad had me hit with him, but obviously he was 100x better than I. I've also hit with a woman who was a top D1 player (Top 5) who played in a Grand Slam the year I hit with her. The depth of ball is what is shocking. Every single groundstroke back to the within a small distance from baseline. Amazing depth and control.
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
Has anyone ever attempted this?
I just want to see what it feels like to hit against the pace of a pro.
Is ATP100 too ambitious?
Please refrain from "You won't be able to tell the difference b/w 5.0 and ATP100"
Maybe it does not have to be ATP100, but I want the real deal.

I want a full 30 mins, not 5 or 10.
Rally, serves, and some point play.
Then post the video so the world can have a laugh.

Let's say I am willing to put upwards of $3000 behind this.

How could I pull this off?
Can I get one to fly into town and I put them up at a hotel for a night?

Can I go to the US Open Qualifiers and ask one of them if they want to make some quick money?
Hop in a car and go find a court ? All I hear is that players outside of the ATP200 are all broke.
Could I pay them $x to be their warm up partner for 30 mins at the tournament?

Another idea is that I see $10k tournaments where real pros apparently play.
$10k? All that travel and overhead for a chance at $10k? Expected value is like $1k.
I can guarantee $10k (get 3-10 friends to chip in $1k-$3k each, and instead of playing a tournament,
he just hits for 30 min. sessions, and walks away with $10k for a days work.
Anyone ever done anything like this?

$3000 will get a top 100 player easy if they are in town. We used to pay top 200 guys $150 for one hour clinics when they were at the tournament. There was also a wta challenger and the new guy was giving them $10 (they got really mad, agree'd on $50), they were like top 500.

I've played 2-3 top100 players. 2 in tournaments (prize money) and one in a money round robin (winner takes all). The money wasnt even close to $3k

"Please refrain from "You won't be able to tell the difference b/w 5.0 and ATP100"

Unless they are a big hitter you wont. But after playing a few points and see they hit every ball the same you will see it. No weakness, no fitness issues etc. Just constant pressure that will break you down in a matter of games. All of a sudden nothing works and you will feel like a 3.0 :)

Best of luck, get in touch with one and it probably wont be hard
 

tennis4me

Hall of Fame
You might be able to hit for an hour instead of half hour for $3,000 considering those players need to get to somewhere around SF to get a price money around $3k in a typical Challenger tournament. It'll be easy money for them. It should be fun.
 

Vanhalen

Professional
TTPS, yes your idea is very plausible. Outside the top 100 these guys are broke. Seriously if you asked them to hit with you for an hour for a grand they would do it all day!

But, be professional about it. Stop with the stupid silly...”I’m going to tape this, if I win a game from you I’ll show everyone.....no one wants to deal with a clown.

In September of 2004 I hit for 30 minutes with a WTA player who was rated 47 in the world. I was a strong 4.0. She was at my club waiting on her coach preparing for the Cincinnati tournament. I know her, she’s from my town. Wonderful person. We rallied for about 10 minutes and then played a match. I told her to just play me as if she was playing Serena or anyone else. In my mind I thought I could probably win a couple of games. I never won a point. I never was even close to winning a point. I never returned one serve over the net! It was either an easy ace or I would barely nick the ball and not once did I ever hit a serve back. She pretty much smacked everyone of my serves back for a winner. The pace and the placement were just so rapid. I was shocked as it doesn’t look this furious on tv.
 

PMChambers

Hall of Fame
See if your nearest futures had a ProAm. I once paid $60 for ProAm which is dinner and 30min doubles hit with someone 200 to 600. One of players got to 80s before injury. Unfortunately it was cancelled because a national coach didn't want it and replaced with a meet the players junior night where the players hit with kids and talk. I was a bit annoyed as there was a dude Delpo size and looks who hit heavy. Wanted 5mins just to see if I could adjust. I see no point hitting with these players other than for interest. Their serves are either to fast for 4.5 react to have too much kick to control or both. Same with their groundies but not as much.
From my experience TW posters signifigantly over estimate their ability especially in speed of serve and weight on groundies. Probably because TV slows everything down.
 

FiReFTW

Legend
@TimeToPlaySets

There are differences in how fast or with how much spin someone hit on ATP top 100 depending on playstyle and ability etc... similar to all other levels.

But generally if you look at pure speeds of strokes and serves, once you get up to like 5.5 its not much different than what the ATP top 100 hit, a 5.5 player (specially someone known for a fast serve or fast forehand or something) has the pace and spin (obviously not the pace of an isner serve or the spin of rafa, but the average top 100 ATP player).

So if you play with a 5.5 you most likely get the same or similar spin and pace that an atp top 100 has.

Theres a huge difference however between a 5.5 and a top 100 when it comes to placement, accuracy, consistency, tactics, footwork, speed, agility etc...
 

2good4U

Professional
I paid a top level woman college player $50 to hit,
and another $50, IF she could outhit me. (I'd rather
hit than play, any day)

She was a Clister's clone, hit a ton and moved like
a gazelle. Big gal too, close to 6 foot.

Being one of the best over 50 players you'll probably
ever see, I held my own, and saved $50.


I've also hit with an ex-ATP top 300 pro, a tall French
guy in his 40's, and held my own against him too.


Those at the top move and hit very well, but they are
only Gods compared to worms. (hackers)


Some of us non-pros can move and hit pretty good too.
 

dr325i

G.O.A.T.
I am fortunate to have the opportunity once per month to hit against the former AP100 player.
Izak now works with me and we hit whenever he has time (he is also coaching top college kids).
When I lived in the Czech Republic, I was fortunate to hit with Hradecka and Safarova.
 
@TimeToPlaySets

There are differences in how fast or with how much spin someone hit on ATP top 100 depending on playstyle and ability etc... similar to all other levels.

But generally if you look at pure speeds of strokes and serves, once you get up to like 5.5 its not much different than what the ATP top 100 hit, a 5.5 player (specially someone known for a fast serve or fast forehand or something) has the pace and spin (obviously not the pace of an isner serve or the spin of rafa, but the average top 100 ATP player).

So if you play with a 5.5 you most likely get the same or similar spin and pace that an atp top 100 has.

Theres a huge difference however between a 5.5 and a top 100 when it comes to placement, accuracy, consistency, tactics, footwork, speed, agility etc...

I agree with this.
I am sure there is a 2000 rated player who hits harder than all the top 20 (and loses matches with errors)
But, part of this is the novelty of hitting against a name.
 
D

Deleted member 23235

Guest
ok, presuming we can all make this happen... who would everyone pick in the atp50-100
looking at the current list, my top 5 would be:
* dolgo (wicked slice!)
* tiafoe (that fh is a monster)
* the other zverev (s&v'er)
* baghdadis (because!)
* ivo (do i need to say why)
and drink afterwards with youzhny * troiki (cuz they are nuts!)
 

Zeref

Professional
ok, presuming we can all make this happen... who would everyone pick in the atp50-100
looking at the current list, my top 5 would be:
* dolgo (wicked slice!)
* tiafoe (that fh is a monster)
* the other zverev (s&v'er)
* baghdadis (because!)
* ivo (do i need to say why)
and drink afterwards with youzhny * troiki (cuz they are nuts!)
Ivo. Bcz I want to feel that serve ( of course if i m able to touch it with my racquet ). If by mistake I hit a good deep return..atleast I got a chance to win the point against Dr. Ivo and boast that I won a point against a top 100;):D.
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
ok, presuming we can all make this happen... who would everyone pick in the atp50-100
looking at the current list, my top 5 would be:
* dolgo (wicked slice!)
* tiafoe (that fh is a monster)
* the other zverev (s&v'er)
* baghdadis (because!)
* ivo (do i need to say why)
and drink afterwards with youzhny * troiki (cuz they are nuts!)

Tsonga, Bennetau, Chardy, Ivo, Istomin.

J
 

jaggy

Talk Tennis Guru
I have watched college players hit with pros and there isn't a great difference to the eye. When they play matches the pro wins the important points and beats them routinely but they both have similar games.
 

Hg's dad1

New User
Has anyone ever attempted this?
I just want to see what it feels like to hit against the pace of a pro.
Is ATP100 too ambitious?
Please refrain from "You won't be able to tell the difference b/w 5.0 and ATP100"
Maybe it does not have to be ATP100, but I want the real deal.

I want a full 30 mins, not 5 or 10.
Rally, serves, and some point play.
Then post the video so the world can have a laugh.

Let's say I am willing to put upwards of $3000 behind this.

How could I pull this off?
Can I get one to fly into town and I put them up at a hotel for a night?

Can I go to the US Open Qualifiers and ask one of them if they want to make some quick money?
Hop in a car and go find a court ? All I hear is that players outside of the ATP200 are all broke.
Could I pay them $x to be their warm up partner for 30 mins at the tournament?

Another idea is that I see $10k tournaments where real pros apparently play.
$10k? All that travel and overhead for a chance at $10k? Expected value is like $1k.
I can guarantee $10k (get 3-10 friends to chip in $1k-$3k each, and instead of playing a tournament,
he just hits for 30 min. sessions, and walks away with $10k for a days work.
Anyone ever done anything like this?
I had the opportunity to hit with a guy ranked 100 in the world back in the late 1980’s I was a small college player at that time. What he played I was not familiar with. His warm up would kill the regular player. Have him to thank for making me work harder in school because I realized that there was no way I’d ever be able to compete at that level.
 

FiReFTW

Legend
I'm not looking for an argument but I want to go on record saying that the lot of you who say a 5.5 hits with the same pace and spin as an 100ATP are VERY wrong.

J

Whats your proof to back up your claims?

Here is mine

My coach is a pretty high level, around 5.5

A very high level coach who is a good friend of my coach, they hit sometimes together.

This high level coach is a coach of a former top 100 pro, currently the player is not 100 anymore cuz injuries atm.

He says in terms of pace, spin etc.. theres no difference between my coach and ex top 100, and bear in mind this ex top 100 is an agressive player who likes to hit big.

However theres a huge difference when it comes to placement, consistency, ability to return tough balls in tough situations with interest and place them well, movement, reactions, tactics, ability to open the court, feel and touch etc etc etc....

Which is completely logical considering 1 person doesnt train and rarely plays matches, just mostly coaches, while the 2nd person trains for hours daily, its logical the 2nd person is much more "trained" and match "ready".

Every higher level player say 5.0+ with good fitness that goes to gym and is physically in good form and has great technique can hit as hard as many pro players, maybe not as much as the anomalies like nadal spin or roddick serve, but as fast as an average pro for sure!

But having a fast stroke is not even 20% of whats important to be better than someone (placement, accuracy, ability to hit strong on run or in tough situations and place it well...so many more things)

There are 5.0 players with 125mph+ serves, but even uf they have pace their serve is not close as good as a top 100 atp pro with similar speed.

Pace and spin is 1 important thing out of 20 important things.
But certainly not the only impirtant thing and certainly also not the MOST important thing
 

FiReFTW

Legend
Just for reference on ratings
According to the official utr - ntrp rating charts

5.5 ntrp level is around high college d2 to low college d1 level
6.0 ntrp is around d1 and men futures level already

These are extremely high tennis levels
 

Pete Player

Hall of Fame
I was watching an ITF Junior ranked at the top-5. The regular ”tentative rally points” in the beginning of the match didn’t look too fast, but, when he stepped on the accelerator in the second set...

They are already some classy players with pace and spin at that level and move like the court were half the size of where we play.


——————————
On pain meds - all contributed matter and anti-matter subject to disclaimer
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
Just for reference on ratings
According to the official utr - ntrp rating charts

5.5 ntrp level is around high college d2 to low college d1 level
6.0 ntrp is around d1 and men futures level already

These are extremely high tennis levels

Are you directing this to me?

You know I live in the US and play against all these people in leagues and open/money tournaments right?

Shouldn't you be asking me how the ratings are instead of telling me?

J
 

rgvhawaii

New User
Huge difference between a top 100 guy and 5.0 player. it's the weight of the ball that is the biggest difference. I've never hit with someone that high up but have been on the court when they work out. the sound of the ball coming off the racquet is so different. I've hit with a top 10 D1 college player and even that was tough when he went full speed. Mishit's HURT
 

Gato

Semi-Pro
Huge difference between a top 100 guy and 5.0 player. it's the weight of the ball that is the biggest difference. I've never hit with someone that high up but have been on the court when they work out. the sound of the ball coming off the racquet is so different. I've hit with a top 10 D1 college player and even that was tough when he went full speed. Mishit's HURT
What do you mean? Ball has same weight, only speed can change
 
Top