Yea, I cannot believe ESPN let her do the final. I'm watching it on mute because i'm tired of hearing her ramble.
Yea, I cannot believe ESPN let her do the final. I'm watching it on mute because i'm tired of hearing her ramble.
In general, I agree with what you're saying about Carillo. She is a blow hard at best. However, in this case I agree with her. She's not saying that electronic line calling is unfair to the players. What she's saying is that the "Challenge" system is unfair to the players. If they are going to use electronic line calling, she would like the umpires to use the technology to determine if the call was correct, or not. Rather than the current system of putting the burden on the players to "Challenge" the call. I happen to agree with her. IMO, the goal should be to get the call correct, not to make a spectacle out of whether the player is going to risk their two challenges per set.(2) During this tournament, she tried to argue that allowing electronic line calling is unfair to the players, "Oh, don't get me started…." Various people are against the technology for various reasons, but not for this reason. How can allowing the players an option is unfair to them?
I'm glad you said this, because I think she does deserve credit for speaking honestly about the state of the game nowadays. Shriver/Mary Jo simply cheerlead the women's matches, no matter how horrible or boring they are.She might talk too much but atleast she says what's on her mind. e.g. she is quite willing to criticize womens tennis for being mindless baseline bashing. You'll never hear that from Shriver or Mary-Joe.
please tell me that this is the last broadcast for ESPN this year for Grand Slams.
please oh please.
Well the tennis channel is going to be broadcasting the French. Not sure who will be in the booth though.
Or will they?Well the tennis channel is going to be broadcasting the French. Not sure who will be in the booth though.
please tell me that this is the last broadcast for ESPN this year for Grand Slams.
please oh please.
10. She sucks.
9. She says every stupid, dumb, idiotic thing that comes to her mind.
8. She obviously remembers every thing every tennis player and commentator ever said and is dying to repeat each and every quote no matter how wrong the timing.
7. Her opinion of the player changes point by point.
6. She has an even worse haircut than Lisa Rinna and that's saying something.
5. She's a HATER of the worst order.
4. Her tone of voice is so annoying I have to hit "mute."
3. She's a phony.
2. I don't think her colleagues even respect her.
1. SHE NEVER KNOWS WHEN TO JUST SHUUUUTTT UUUUPPPPPPP!!!!
Mary Carillo will you please shut up!!!! OMG am I the only one that has noticed that Mary Carillo never shuts up during the points. She will start talking then once the point has started she is still going on and on about some useless crap that no one even cares about. What, is her brain to small to remember what she was going to say until the point is done? I mean she doesn’t even know what she is talking about. In the Nadal match she was praising the way that Nadal hits his forehand (with the follow through up over his left shoulder rather than across his body) and all but said that it is the best way to hit it. I wonder how many people sitting at home watching that went to their club the next day and tried to hit their forehand that way and then had to quit because their wrist hurt so bad after 10 minutes. She then went on to say that the way that Nadal hits his forehand is better than the traditional way of coming across your body. Yes that is the truth if you like to make things as complicated, and inefficient as possible. Thank God that Cliffy was there to set her straight! I wonder how Cliff Drysdale can even put up with her.
I hope that someone agrees with me, I mean it makes me so mad when she talks during the points. Even Pmac’s constant praising of Andy Roddick, and Dick Enberg’s complete lack of tennis knowledge are better than Mary Carillo’s constant babbling.
You are so right, and that's something I noticed when I first got my hands on the 2005 Safin vs Federer Australian Open Semi-Final video. The two Eurosport guys talked about their games, previous matches in the tournament, and so much relevant information.. all BETWEEN points. That was such a revelation to actually hear good commentary during a match. You can't truly comprehend how bad the commentary is on ESPN2 until you experience competent commentators do commentary.I agree with you as well. On occasion when my brothers are watching she will say something that makes no sense and we will just look at each other.
If you want great commentary, get ATP master's series TV.
The commentators are 2 Brits most of the time, and they talk about the players, matches, and their games in a way that any player can learn from.
The best part is that they speak sparingly and to the point, rather than the incessant jibbering of Carillo or Shriver...
Before, I either enjoyed Mary or was ambivalent. Yeah, she tries too hard sometimes, but she never really bothered me...
Until today. Actually, she was kind of annoying me yesterday, but today when she was going on and on about Hawkeye, she may have lost me for good. She made very little sense. Murray continued to play a point even though a backhand was out (by an inch or two) and immediately after the point, when Murray went back to look at the mark, she exclaimed "this is why I hate the review system!!!" Huh? Because Murray didn't stop the point and ask for a review? How is that the technology's fault? Later, she said that Hawkeye might have cost Andy the championship and it was unfair. It was truly bizarre.
Until today. Actually, she was kind of annoying me yesterday, but today when she was going on and on about Hawkeye, she may have lost me for good. She made very little sense. Murray continued to play a point even though a backhand was out (by an inch or two) and immediately after the point, when Murray went back to look at the mark, she exclaimed "this is why I hate the review system!!!" Huh? Because Murray didn't stop the point and ask for a review? How is that the technology's fault? Later, she said that Hawkeye might have cost Andy the championship and it was unfair. It was truly bizarre.
Or McEnroe?rather than the incessant jibbering of Carillo or Shriver...