Slam titles with Big3/4 in the draw
- Thread starter Lew II
- Start date
UnderratedSlam
G.O.A.T.
Rafa and Novak lead this, logical...
Third Serve
Talk Tennis Guru
How is this in any way a relevant statistic?
Lleytonstation
Talk Tennis Guru
How about where is the logic? How many times did Fed play without the big3 due to being much older. Yet he, at a much older age is still around, and they get credit for it?
Logically this is worthless.
Lleytonstation
Talk Tennis Guru
Fed played 22 slams before Djoker even came on the scene... 24 before Murray came to the scene... 
Third Serve
Talk Tennis Guru
I’m surprised he’s actually not that far off from the other two in these stats despite playing part of his prime years in a completely different era.Fed played 22 slams before Djoker even came on the scene... 24 before Murray came to the scene...
Of course, you’d need to address the fact that this doesn’t take into consideration the actual meetings between the big 3.
UnderratedSlam
G.O.A.T.
Incognito
Legend
are you sure that’s correct.
beaten Rafa at AO and USO
Beaten djoko at USO and Wimbledon
Beaten Fed at AO.
clout
Hall of Fame
I mean 5-20 isn't much better. I have a lot of respect for Murray's career achievements but by far the biggest hole in his resume is his abysmal record in finals and late in slams against his top rivals.
Lew II
G.O.A.T.
UnderratedSlam
G.O.A.T.
You can't beat an injured man. You can only get a gift "victory". AO vs Rafa I did not include.
ForumMember
Hall of Fame
How many Djokovic could win when I was in the draw? genuine question.
Similar threads
