Why can they start WTA match following Djokovic match and continue from there on.I hope that Nadal defeats the Argentine in 2 hours tops.
Bad schedule for the Spaniard tomorrow!
Why can they start WTA match following Djokovic match and continue from there on.I hope that Nadal defeats the Argentine in 2 hours tops.
Bad schedule for the Spaniard tomorrow!
I mean, just plain ridiculous! That is a pretty wicked kick serve pulling out wide that you actually want to execute in ad court. But of course, it is Rafa on the other end and he completely decimated it! It is absolutely unreal what Rafa can do to the ball. Unreal.
Even if RG is the main target where he seeks to win his 20th Major, his 10th title in Rome is not ruled out either.
Wow, Bull is in trouble now!
After a horrendous lose against the Argentine, it will need to turnaround in his state of form, heading to the most atypical RG that is remembered and where various factors will not favor him in his game.
What solutions will Moya seek with Nadal in the absence of a few days before the start of the tournament, which is the most important of the season for the Spaniard?
It is possible that Argentine is on Nadal's side; What will the Bull do to stop the attacks of his rival in the autumn of Paris, with heavy and slow balls?No need to panic.
In the first round of Cincinnati (which was being played at US Open courts), Thiem lost 6-2 6-1 to Krajinovic. He only won 2 points on return in the whole match, due to how rusty he was. A few weeks later, he won the US Open.
For Rafa, my hope is that he gets a relatively comfortable first few rounds at RG. Then in R4/QF, I hope he has a relatively tough match which he gets through. This will give him confidence for the SF and F, which will be very tough no doubt. Also hopefully Diego is on opposite side of the draw!!
Yeah, there are no certainties in life. Many obstacles will lie ahead in Paris.It is possible that Argentine is on Nadal's side; What will the Bull do to stop the attacks of his rival in the autumn of Paris, with heavy and slow balls?
And if it rains, it will be played indoors, which reduces his chances of success.
I do question though, why the guy who is known to be adversely affected by humidity and loves the sun and plays best on warm sunny days had to play every night and didn't get one single afternoon match. Doesn't seem fair to me.
No need to panic.
In the first round of Cincinnati (which was being played at US Open courts), Thiem lost 6-2 6-1 to Krajinovic. He only won 2 points on return in the whole match, due to how rusty he was. A few weeks later, he won the US Open.
For Rafa, my hope is that he gets a relatively comfortable first few rounds at RG. Then in R4/QF, I hope he has a relatively tough match which he gets through. This will give him confidence for the SF and F, which will be very tough no doubt. Also hopefully Diego is on opposite side of the draw!!
yes..djoko has 3late mathes last year, then had to play nadal in the afternoon final..we got the one sided final. i was worried about...djoko was wasted and had to adjest to warmer bouncier courtsThis is often done in Rome, where the top guy from one of the side plays all his matches primarily in the evening. And since Rafa is the big box office name from his side of the draw, he was always going to be on prime time to the viewers to get highest ratings possible. Last year Djokovic was the one playing all his matches at night. Just something Rome has always done.
yes..djoko has 3late mathes last year, then had to play nadal in the afternoon final..we got the one sided final. i was worried about...djoko was wasted and had to adjest to warmer bouncier courts
the final wouldve been much closer/interesting if djoko had a few mours hrs to recover. but OH NO
does anyone know where to find Nadal press conference after loss to schwartzman?
It's Rafa. Always classy and always ready to accept what happened and get back to work. He doesn't seem too fazed by it and I think we'll seem him let loose on RG.
I remember the last time he lost in QF at Rome, he went on to win FO without dropping a set giving a blistering performance.
Lets not forget Rafas age. We all are guilty of thinking he is invincible on clay, year after year.
But we get the same lessons watching an old Federer play.
They still have outstanding matches on their day. But there will be plenty more days, that their form is terrible.
Unfortunately for Nadal and fans, these type of losses will probably be more frequent , even on clay.
Obviously, we are all hoping he can still rule in Paris this year. But it also wont be a huge surprise if hes humbled out around the QF stage.
How many times has he lost unexpectedly before the French and lo and behold he ends up winning it??? Let’s all take a deep breath, relax, and realize that this might be but a small hiccup. We all live to fight another day, here’s to hoping for good things in Paris. VAMOS!!!!
Even though he didn't beat Diego, Nadal is currently playing better than Djokovic, and that's probably good enough to win Roland Garros.Wow, Bull is in trouble now!
After a horrendous lose against the Argentine, it will need to turnaround in his state of form, heading to the most atypical RG that is remembered and where various factors will not favor him in his game.
What solutions will Moya seek with Nadal in the absence of a few days before the start of the tournament, which is the most important of the season for the Spaniard?
How many times has he lost unexpectedly before the French and lo and behold he ends up winning it???
My only concern is the lack of match-play this year. He should, however, play nicely into form around the 4th round. Hoping he makes it that far and then the Diesel engine will be unstoppableHere's some examples in the past 10 years:
2011: Lost Madrid and Rome to Djokovic
2012: Lost MC and Rome to Djokovic, lost to Verdasco in Madrid
2013: Lost MC to Djokovic
2014: Lost MC to Ferrer, lost Barcelona to Almagro, lost Rome to Djokovic
2016: Lost Madrid to Murray and Rome to Djokovic
2017: Lost Rome to Thiem
2018: Lost Madrid to Thiem
2019: Lost MC to Fabio, lost to Thiem in Barcelona and lost to Tsitsipas in Madrid
None if Nadal plays near his best. Djokovic i think has stamina issues which Nadal could expose. Thiem surely will be flat after his past few weeks and the adulation he has got. Wawrinka on clay against Nadal is pretty one way traffic.Do Rafa fans fear Djoker, Wawa, or Thiem more right now?
The balls is going to be a massive problem for Nadal. Bigger and heavier they will not take much spin. Nadal is not that effective in heavy conditions. These new balls are a killer for him. Also while you made some great points nadal was not winning many 1st serves anyway.Let's NOT overreact on one loss. Losing to Deigo doesn't suddenly mean that Nadal is vulnerable in RG.
The way I saw the match, what killed Rafa was his serving. He served less then 45% 1st serve. That is just atrocious. He is usually at the 65%+ mark.
The problem with missing so many 1st serves is that it puts pressure on your second serve, and hence Diego won more than 65%+ points won on Nadal's second serve. Which means Rafa was under pressure throughout on his serve and couldn't hold.
Still the second set was close. This is a game on inches, and had Nadal served better he could have won the 2nd set and fought more (and maybe prevailed).
This kind of serving against Novak it would have been even bigger trouble, given the quality of the Djokovic return.
So Nadal doesn't need to do much. He needs to improve his serve and tighten the rest of his game for RG.
The biggest problem for Rafa in RG is not the loss to Diego here. If anything, it would make him even more determined. The challenge would be the conditions. With the cooler conditions, the ball is not exploding off the court and Rafa will need to serve bigger and be more aggressive of the ground.
But yeah, it's clay and it's Nadal. He will ALWAYS be the overwhelming favorite at RG. A loss in Rome doesn't change that. If he plays his best, no one beats him in Paris. Period.
I assume Rafa will not play like he did against Schwartzman, but if he does, Djoker will beat him. If Rafa plays his B+ game he beats Djoker.None if Nadal plays near his best. Djokovic i think has stamina issues which Nadal could expose. Thiem surely will be flat after his past few weeks and the adulation he has got. Wawrinka on clay against Nadal is pretty one way traffic.
That is Nadals fault is it not?Honestly I do question whether Nadal will win RG or not. He lost to Diego but that's not really the reason. Nadal would normally have more clay tourneys to prepare for RG. This year is very different. He hasn't played in 200 days, then only gets 3 matches in the one and only warm up tournament to RG. I'm not sure that's enough preparation tbh.
Meanwhile Djokovic will have plenty of matches under his belt yet not be overloaded. And Thiem obviously has lots of matches under his belt too (tho no clay).
Agree but i doubt his serve will be that poor again in a while. His big issue will be the balls which are heavy this year. Will be a problem for Djokovic as well.I assume Rafa will not play like he did against Schwartzman, but if he does, Djoker will beat him. If Rafa plays his B+ game he beats Djoker.
He won MC and Rome in 2012, but I would mention Madrid 2014 final where he wasn't unlikely to lose if not for Kei's injury.Here's some examples in the past 10 years:
2011: Lost Madrid and Rome to Djokovic
2012: Lost MC and Rome to Djokovic, lost to Verdasco in Madrid
2013: Lost MC to Djokovic
2014: Lost MC to Ferrer, lost Barcelona to Almagro, lost Rome to Djokovic
2016: Lost Madrid to Murray and Rome to Djokovic
2017: Lost Rome to Thiem
2018: Lost Madrid to Thiem
2019: Lost MC to Fabio, lost to Thiem in Barcelona and lost to Tsitsipas in Madrid
Nadal was far better on clay before 2010. He has been beatable last decade but djokovic has often not believed he can beat him.Here's some examples in the past 10 years:
2011: Lost Madrid and Rome to Djokovic
2012: Lost MC and Rome to Djokovic, lost to Verdasco in Madrid
2013: Lost MC to Djokovic
2014: Lost MC to Ferrer, lost Barcelona to Almagro, lost Rome to Djokovic
2016: Lost Madrid to Murray and Rome to Djokovic
2017: Lost Rome to Thiem
2018: Lost Madrid to Thiem
2019: Lost MC to Fabio, lost to Thiem in Barcelona and lost to Tsitsipas in Madrid
In your opinion.Nadal was far better on clay before 2010. He has been beatable last decade but djokovic has often not believed he can beat him.