R. Schweikart
Professional
Full translations of Peng's original Weibo have been posted multiple times on this thread already
...
Because some people reacted swiftly and made screen shots, comrade.
But nice try...
Full translations of Peng's original Weibo have been posted multiple times on this thread already
...
The point is her post sounds much less like the sexual assault accusation Western media pretends it is, and more like a jilted loverBecause some people reacted swiftly and made screen shots, comrade.
But nice try...
What was her crime?
And, of course IOC is happy, as they don't want to cancel the Olympics.
Real test will come early next year when Peng is released without a full investigation. Will WTA continue to suspend the China tournaments in the 2nd half of 2022 or will they backtrack on their demand for a full investigation which won't happen.
Unless she is traveling outisde of China or contacting people outside of China for reasons other than telling people she is fine then it is safe to assume she is still under some level of house arrest.Peng has already been released. As in many Asian countries, criticism of high public officials can be a crime. Thai jails are full of people who criticised the King. I don't agree with that, but it is what it is.
Unless she is traveling outisde of China or contacting people outside of China for reasons other than telling people she is fine then it is safe to assume she is still under some level of house arrest.
Why? I live in the US and have friends overseas and haven’t contacted them in the last three months. I don’t believe I’m under house arrest.Unless she is traveling outisde of China or contacting people outside of China for reasons other than telling people she is fine then it is safe to assume she is still under some level of house arrest.
It will never end. After she does appear overseas, critics will say the CCP is holding her family hostage back at home.This game of setting ever higher standards of proof that China must provide you lot got tired a long time ago.
Did you make sexual assault accusations against a high ranking official which were then removed and then you vanished for 2 weeks and the government released a statement purporting to be you? Don’t compare the two.Why? I live in the US and have friends overseas and haven’t contacted them in the last three months. I don’t believe I’m under house arrest.
Did you make sexual assault accusations against a high ranking official which were then removed and then you vanished for 2 weeks and the government released a statement purporting to be you? Don’t compare the two.
If you are a Chinese national, you know that you need to enter China with your own passport. Then, you need a permission from the security bureau to leave China. Chinese do not have the opportunity to just visit a foreign consulate for a visa to another nation as they must obtain a permission prior to apply for their traveling visas even when they have their passports. So, do you think Peng Shuai has a complete clearance to just hop on the plane and visit the WTA for a briefing now?I live in the US and have friends overseas and haven’t contacted them in the last three months. I don’t believe I’m under house arrest.
Who do you think will be more transparent?It will never end. After she does appear overseas, critics will say the CCP is holding her family hostage back at home.
Why? I live in the US and have friends overseas and haven’t contacted them in the last three months. I don’t believe I’m under house arrest.
"SHE commited a crime"?--what about the crime(s) committed against her?--seems like woman are nothing but chattel in the CCP run China.She was detained because she commited a crime,...
"Makes me think" you are making that stat up out of your pie-hole--Cite your source or it's utter BS--if true, I suggest they all be released and put in a half way house next door to U. No worries mate, in kali they've been released so they don't get the wu-wu--and getting vocational training as LOOTERS!--coming to a suburban mall near U.Are we that free in the West. Did you know that 25% of the worlds prison population is an American sitting in an American jail.
So 1 in 4 prisoners in the entire world is a US citizen. Makes you think.
"SHE commited a crime"?--what about the crime(s) committed against her?--seems like woman are nothing but chattel in the CCP run China.
"Makes me think" you are making that stat up out of your pie-hole--Cite your source or it's utter BS--if true, I suggest they all be released and put in a half way house next door to U. No worries mate, in kali they've been released so they don't get the wu-wu--and getting vocational training as LOOTERS!--coming to a suburban mall near U.
Do u get 50 cents for this one too?--this must be about quantity and not quality. Dashiell Hammett had to delver more than that when he was a copywriter for dept. store adds.I asked you to read #125 for my position, so why that is unclear to you is a mystery.
I suggest u bring your red star icon out of the closet--in these times it makes it clearer which side your batting for.I like criminals, in any event, so it was an expression of my admiration.
Do u get 50 cents for this one too?--this must be about quantity and not quality. Dashiell Hammett had to delver more than that when he was a copywriter for dept. store adds.
How come the US imprisons so much more people than the rest of the world? Either we've got way too many criminals, or the system convicts too many peopleErrrr....maybe don't break the law?
Or are you suggesting cops go around snatching people and throwing them in prisons in the US?
I suggest u bring your red star icon out of the closet--in these times it makes it clearer which side your batting for.
Get a job!According to Wikipedia, there are no 50 cent Chinese commentators. They are actually party bureaucrats.
Watch the news mate and u'll see why--or, hang out at a Walgreens, Nordstrom's, or Luis Vuitton and u'll find out why there AREN'T enough criminals in prison--but there are millions more waiting there turn to invade at the southern border--with $450,000 as an incentive I may jump the line myself--funny how well clothed and fed they all look--Heels Up has done her job well on her mercy missions to South America--maybe she should visit her dad once in a while. BTW, heard they're putting a half-way house next door to where u live--enjoy your new friends.How come the US imprisons so much more people than the rest of the world? Either we've got way too many criminals, or the system convicts too many people
I would only pay u 20cents for that one--you're price gouging at 50cents.Xie Xie
U shouldn't have been--it wasn't favorably--but glad to hear u've heard of him--u must be really old! He wrote ads for a jewelry store--that work would be beneath your present day dignity I'm sure--they didn't have food stamps and SSI back then.But you compared me to Dashiell Hammett so I'm flattered!
Ever hear of 9/11 mate? The 300,000 bombs came out of your pie-hole once again--do u work for wang or does wang work for u?--asking for a friend.I do find it funny that the US has dropped over 300,000 bombs in the middle east over the past 2 decades, but thats not a human rights violation, yet censoring a post is.
Can you imagine the uproar if China dropped 10 bombs in the middle east. Now imagine a country dropping 300,000.
Well, let's use our imaginations now--the CCP may reneg on it's deal to maintain the citizens of Hong Kong's freedoms, and arrest publishers of news papers and hundreds of protesters, (and we're not talking "catch & release" like the Georg Soros commie DA's do)-- it may threaten to annex Japan and make dangerous military provocations with flyovers of Taiwan--nah, that would smack of imperialism with hints of "ultra(-)nationalism"--nah, not in the cards--unimaginable from a peace loving regime. --oh, how 'bout sovereign Tibet?The right move is for the US, its allies and China to stop with the flamethrowing and just leave their ideological biases at the door to try and figure out how to co-exist in this world. If there are legitimate human rights issues, those should be discussed and dealt with openly. But the current environment of ultranationalism stoked by fabricated narratives is only going to take us down a path to greater hostility. If it doesn't stop, who knows what will happen.
U're a lot closer to the CCP than the USA is--without us covering your back maybe start learning Mandarin--hope u have friends in high places.And red, white and blue means nothing much as well.
U're a lot closer to the CCP than the USA is--without us covering your back maybe start learning Mandarin--hope u have friends in high places.
Nuclear deterrence says nothing by way of conventional warfare can happen. So... biological warfare then with its A grade potential for plausible denial? Or maybe more cyber hacking, strategic purchases of companies in sensitive industries or blocking such purchases. The endgame is not going to be as electrifying as those seemingly spoiling for a fight may be hoping for.The right move is for the US, its allies and China to stop with the flamethrowing and just leave their ideological biases at the door to try and figure out how to co-exist in this world. If there are legitimate human rights issues, those should be discussed and dealt with openly. But the current environment of ultranationalism stoked by fabricated narratives is only going to take us down a path to greater hostility. If it doesn't stop, who knows what will happen.
Now that one's good for a dollar! I'm writing u up for a promotion and a raise!I have not the slightest concern for China's intentions ... it's our intentions that I fear.
Nice summary of what's been quietly going on and fast gaining momentum with the help of bag-boy Hunter. Thankfully I play a cheap sport and hopefully I won't be around when socialism totally creeps in taking complete hold of the canchas for the use and sport of the party elites with private courts at their dachas. It took a woman doubles champion to bring light onto this subject--Peng Shuai is following in the courageous foot steps of Alice Marble.Nuclear deterrence says nothing by way of conventional warfare can happen. So... biological warfare then with its A grade potential for plausible denial? Or maybe more cyber hacking, strategic purchases of companies in sensitive industries or blocking such purchases. The endgame is not going to be as electrifying as those seemingly spoiling for a fight may be hoping for.
Its obvious from your posts where you lie on this matter. I will try to keep things as civil as possible but there several flaws in your observation which has been propagated by the MSM. Please take into consideration I will state some facts that you may not like but are facts nonetheless & are easily verifiable via wikipedia & the like.Well, let's use our imaginations now--the CCP may reneg on it's deal to maintain the citizens of Hong Kong's freedoms, and arrest publishers of news papers and hundreds of protesters, (and we're not talking "catch & release" like the Georg Soros commie DA's do)-- it may threaten to annex Japan and make dangerous military provocations with flyovers of Taiwan--nah, that would smack of imperialism with hints of "ultra(-)nationalism"--nah, not in the cards--unimaginable from a peace loving regime. --oh, how 'bout sovereign Tibet?
YUP!--you're catching on quick Bart!--that's how we roll in the civilized free world where EACH human life maters.So we create an international incident and potentially cancel the Olympics because of an immoral liaison?
Its obvious from your posts where you lie on this matter. I will try to keep things as civil as possible but there several flaws in your observation which has been propagated by the MSM. Please take into consideration I will state some facts that you may not like but are facts nonetheless & are easily verifiable via wikipedia & the like.
1) Hong Kong (HK) was taken from China very egregiously during the Opium Wars via gunboat diplomacy. Britain wanted free reign to sell an illicit drug to the Chinese. The went to war with Britain to stop it but lost & ceded HK in the Treaty of Nanking. When Britain handed back HK to China in 1997, it tried to add all manner of preconditions that were not in Treaty of Nanking. China just nodded & ignored it! Britain had held HK for 150 years & the they never once offered free elections, universal suffrage, democracy etc. but now that she has been returned to China, HK needs to be given all these freedoms that were previously denied to her by the British! Hypocritical much!
2) The MSM just loves repeating that China keeps flying over Taiwan in a threatening manner. The term often used is "China encroaches into Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ)". What the MSM doesn't tell you is the ADIZ doesn't mean airspace & they quietly choose not to highlight this distinction! The ADIZ is an arbitrary monitoring zone chosen by Taiwan & is not its national airspace. Why don't you google an image of Taiwan's ADIZ, you will see it extends deep into China's mainland. A Chinese plane could be encroaching it while parked on the ground in China! Why don't you check the news reports again. Does any say that China entered Taiwan's national airspace? Its always the ADIZ!
3) Tibet was taken by the Kuomintang (KMT) that was subsequently beaten by the CCP in the Chinese Civil War. The KMT than ran into exile in Taiwan. So its your boys in Taiwan that took Tibet. The CCP just took custody of it after the KMT left!
NICE SPIN! Biden can use u for his press-secretary after the red-head quits--that is if xi will release u to travel--maybe u can ad Peng Shuai to your entourage to be the group's hitting partner--or, something. You must have graduated from an American journalism school to spin so well--Berkeley, Stanford, Cornell?Its obvious from your posts where you lie on this matter. I will try to keep things as civil as possible but there several flaws in your observation which has been propagated by the MSM. Please take into consideration I will state some facts that you may not like but are facts nonetheless & are easily verifiable via wikipedia & the like.
1) Hong Kong (HK) was taken from China very egregiously during the Opium Wars via gunboat diplomacy. Britain wanted free reign to sell an illicit drug to the Chinese. The went to war with Britain to stop it but lost & ceded HK in the Treaty of Nanking. When Britain handed back HK to China in 1997, it tried to add all manner of preconditions that were not in Treaty of Nanking. China just nodded & ignored it! Britain had held HK for 150 years & the they never once offered free elections, universal suffrage, democracy etc. but now that she has been returned to China, HK needs to be given all these freedoms that were previously denied to her by the British! Hypocritical much!
2) The MSM just loves repeating that China keeps flying over Taiwan in a threatening manner. The term often used is "China encroaches into Taiwan's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ)". What the MSM doesn't tell you is the ADIZ doesn't mean airspace & they quietly choose not to highlight this distinction! The ADIZ is an arbitrary monitoring zone chosen by Taiwan & is not its national airspace. Why don't you google an image of Taiwan's ADIZ, you will see it extends deep into China's mainland. A Chinese plane could be encroaching it while parked on the ground in China! Why don't you check the news reports again. Does any say that China entered Taiwan's national airspace? Its always the ADIZ!
3) Tibet was taken by the Kuomintang (KMT) that was subsequently beaten by the CCP in the Chinese Civil War. The KMT than ran into exile in Taiwan. So its your boys in Taiwan that took Tibet. The CCP just took custody of it after the KMT left!
You should apply for last minute entry to the Olympics, just in case there's a free spot in the mental gymnastics team.3) Tibet was taken by the Kuomintang (KMT) that was subsequently beaten by the CCP in the Chinese Civil War. The KMT than ran into exile in Taiwan. So its your boys in Taiwan that took Tibet. The CCP just took custody of it after the KMT left!
--Hello, Chinese here. Actually Peng Shuai has indeed used the word "forced" (逼)in her description of the second sexual encounter three years ago.
Basically the timeline: Ten+ years ago she was his secret lover and of course they had consensual sex and and then the man got promoted and they never contacted again
Three years ago old man felt h*rny again and arranged a hit with Peng in the morning as an excuse to have sex with her in the afternoon, under the consent and guard of his own wife (what kind of sick porn plot is that?!). Peng initially refused but after some emotional manipulation by the senior smooth talker and unable to get over her lingering feelings, she finally gave in.
And of course afterwards she was again dumped like trash leading to her pent up emotions and eventual decision to spill the beans probably out of spite this year.
So was this a metoo thing? Probably not. It was more like a mistress getting dumped twice and attempting to exact revenge by publicly revealing the affair.
But was the second sexual encounter 100% consensual or legitimate? Probably not. First of all, Peng initially refused, and quite strongly at that. Also, what kind of man gets away with taking a woman to his house, demanding her to have sex with her and insisting after she initially refused? And all that with his wife's consent? His power had everything to do with him being able to secure a hit with Peng (he basically did it through connections), him intimidating his wife into consenting to adultery committed against herself, and the boldness with which he conducted the whole affair and with which he coerced Peng into the second sexual encounter. So even if it wasn't straight out r*pe it was definitely a story of a man exploiting his power to harm not just one, but two women.
Whether this is sexual assault or not isn't even important. (It's important in the sense that women should be protected, of course, but not important in determining the official's guilt. He's guilty either way.) This is more related to the misconduct and abuse of power by a Chinese official and that's why China is losing face.
Hello, Chinese here. Actually Peng Shuai has indeed used the word "forced" (逼)in her description of the second sexual encounter three years ago.
Basically the timeline: Ten+ years ago she was his secret lover and of course they had consensual sex and and then the man got promoted and they never contacted again
Three years ago old man felt h*rny again and arranged a hit with Peng in the morning as an excuse to have sex with her in the afternoon, under the consent and guard of his own wife (what kind of sick porn plot is that?!). Peng initially refused but after some emotional manipulation by the senior smooth talker and unable to get over her lingering feelings, she finally gave in.
And of course afterwards she was again dumped like trash leading to her pent up emotions and eventual decision to spill the beans probably out of spite this year.
So was this a metoo thing? Probably not. It was more like a mistress getting dumped twice and attempting to exact revenge by publicly revealing the affair.
But was the second sexual encounter 100% consensual or legitimate? Probably not. First of all, Peng initially refused, and quite strongly at that. Also, what kind of man gets away with taking a woman to his house, demanding her to have sex with her and insisting after she initially refused? And all that with his wife's consent? His power had everything to do with him being able to secure a hit with Peng (he basically did it through connections), him intimidating his wife into consenting to adultery committed against herself, and the boldness with which he conducted the whole affair and with which he coerced Peng into the second sexual encounter. So even if it wasn't straight out r*pe it was definitely a story of a man exploiting his power to harm not just one, but two women.
Whether this is sexual assault or not isn't even important. (It's important in the sense that women should be protected, of course, but not important in determining the official's guilt. He's guilty either way.) This is more related to the misconduct and abuse of power by a Chinese official and that's why China is losing face.
This.It is punishing Chinese people and players not China.
Tennis cannot pressurize Chinese government and will only punish Chinese people.
Overall Tennis can't take moral action, as it's most tournament are base in usa.
I don't even like China, I am Indian( from UP) mostly North indian don't like China or hate them.
But Anybody who is doing business with USA, UK and Arab countries can't take moral action even for name sake of it
I was young and stupid, and had no prior experience before my first time/experience, it was rape. I did have consensual sex with my rapist afterwards, as well as non-consensual. A part of me died a long time ago - reading the posts by some of the guys here disgusts me. If this is how guys read allegations of this nature, well, there’s a reason why my own rapist never suffered any consequences. Why it would be foolish of me to say anything. As evidenced by how some people react.
Hello, Chinese here. Actually Peng Shuai has indeed used the word "forced" (逼)in her description of the second sexual encounter three years ago.
Basically the timeline: Ten+ years ago she was his secret lover and of course they had consensual sex and and then the man got promoted and they never contacted again
Three years ago old man felt h*rny again and arranged a hit with Peng in the morning as an excuse to have sex with her in the afternoon, under the consent and guard of his own wife (what kind of sick porn plot is that?!). Peng initially refused but after some emotional manipulation by the senior smooth talker and unable to get over her lingering feelings, she finally gave in.
And of course afterwards she was again dumped like trash leading to her pent up emotions and eventual decision to spill the beans probably out of spite this year.
So was this a metoo thing? Probably not. It was more like a mistress getting dumped twice and attempting to exact revenge by publicly revealing the affair.
But was the second sexual encounter 100% consensual or legitimate? Probably not. First of all, Peng initially refused, and quite strongly at that. Also, what kind of man gets away with taking a woman to his house, demanding her to have sex with her and insisting after she initially refused? And all that with his wife's consent? His power had everything to do with him being able to secure a hit with Peng (he basically did it through connections), him intimidating his wife into consenting to adultery committed against herself, and the boldness with which he conducted the whole affair and with which he coerced Peng into the second sexual encounter. So even if it wasn't straight out r*pe it was definitely a story of a man exploiting his power to harm not just one, but two women.
Whether this is sexual assault or not isn't even important. (It's important in the sense that women should be protected, of course, but not important in determining the official's guilt. He's guilty either way.) This is more related to the misconduct and abuse of power by a Chinese official and that's why China is losing face.
On the final days the US pulled out of Afghanistan they dropped a targeted missile strike wiping out 8 terrorists which they said was justice for the earlier bombing. They promoted this story in the worldwide media.
It turned out to be a family that had nothing to do with anything. That just about sums it up in terms of the constant human rights abuse going on through the justification of war.