Sampras forehand round the net

wlinchon

Rookie
Is that shot good? I mean, doesn't it have to go over the net and land in to be a winner? No matter how many times I look at the clip, I still can't understand.
 

Zhou

Hall of Fame
Is that shot good? I mean, doesn't it have to go over the net and land in to be a winner? No matter how many times I look at the clip, I still can't understand.

Well he got the point didn't he?
And they called it a winner...
 

wlinchon

Rookie
him88002 said:
Dude it doesn't have to go over the net it just has to land in.

My apologies for my ignorance. I know that that shot is now history but, for example, let's say that someone serves a shot that is extremely wide (with a wicked kicking slice). All I have to do is return it straight down, regardless of the height of the net, and have it land in to make it a winner? Why have I been trying to get it over the net then?

And what if the court has the length of the net slightly longer that the width of the court, post to post? Then some courts would be 'easier' to hit winners, wouldn't they? Are there rules as to how long the net should be?

Again, my apologies. I just really want to know.
 

VGP

Legend
Technically, the rule is the net posts have to be three feet outside the sideline. For exclusively singles play, the net is placed within where the doubles alleys are. Around the net post shots are more possible in singles play that way.

The same would therefore go for doubles play where the net posts are placed outside the doubles sideline. Around the net post shots are possible too when the court is "expanded" to include the doubles alleys.
 
Top