Not true. The Tecnifibres are great racquets. I'd call the Donnay Pro One Int'l MP a "Poor Man's T-Fight 335".Not sure about these frames. One of the TW guys have said these are " Poor man's Wilson frame" so to speak. It plays like Wilson N-codes but just not as solid is what i heard.
Not sure about these frames. One of the TW guys have said these are " Poor man's Wilson frame" so to speak. It plays like Wilson N-codes but just not as solid is what i heard.
I think thats more than a little unfair. Tecnifibre is, without question, a stand alone first rate company. Their frames aren't as popular or as widely distributed as others, but they are not a poor man's anything. The feel on the T-Fight series is, I think, somewhat similar to the feel of an N-Code or K-Factor but slightly different. I wouldn't necessarily call it a less solid feel, its definitely different, but not in a bad way per se.
OK then, which has better control and power ?? Tech or N-codes ??
Thats not an intelligent question and I think you know that. Both companies produce about 10 different models. I have used a couple of Tecnifibres and most of the Wilson line and I think that there are racquets for me and racquets that aren't for me.
If I'm reading this correctly, you are saying one racket blows another away, yet you haven't even hit with the other one?!?! "You were told"?Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
Not sure about these frames. One of the TW guys have said these are " Poor man's Wilson frame" so to speak. It plays like Wilson N-codes but just not as solid is what i heard.
Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
I don't think a TW Staffer would make a comment like that.
Tecnifibre make great racquets they are just not as well known right now in the US market.
You should demo racquets from all the brands you are interested in and then make an educated decision on what you want to buy.
Chris, TW
I think that the n95 has a slightly more solid feel but also a little more powerful. The Tec 335 is a little more hl and I like how it feels when serving. It has a better mix of feel and control than the n95. To be honest, since you obviously haven't played with a single Tecnifibre racquet I can't imagine on what basis you are making any of these comments. To put it simply, Tecnifibre makes perfectly good racquets. Paying 20 or 30 dollars more for a Wilson is not going to buy you better graphite (which is absolutely preposterous, the graphite used in a tennis racquet costs about 5 cents so unless they are using pencil graphite I doubt its much different than anybody else's graphite). If a Tecnifibre racquet is the best racquet for you then you should buy.
Ok then if you compare Ncode 95 and tech 335, which has better control and power ?? I think Ncode 95 blows away tech 335 out of the water. I was told that tech 335 has cheap graphite feel to it...
Not sure about these frames. One of the TW guys have said these are " Poor man's Wilson frame" so to speak. It plays like Wilson N-codes but just not as solid is what i heard.
You cannot compare the TF-320 to the nCode 95 because they are in different classes of racquets, like comparing apples and oranges. For a more apples-to-apples comparison, you have to compare the TF-335 to the nCode 95. Those two are more in similar weight classes. I mean you wouldn't compare the power of a heavyweight boxer with a featherweight boxer, would you?Obviously there are some strong followers of Tech rackets. I do apologize if i offended any Technifibre supporters. but YES i did hit with 320 and felt it was little too light on contact with the ball, meaning shots that came off the string bed felt like it was a LIGHT ball, instead of Heavy ball like Ncode produces. I did NOT try the tec 335's however, maybe 335's can produce a heavier ball than 320's ?? If 335's is easier to swing than Ncode 95 and can produce just as of heavy ball then yes i say Technifibre has a Winner there.
Right here at TW: http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/TecnifibreRacquets.htmlAlright I think Ill try one. Anyone know any shops in the states that sells them?
What i want to know is if TF335 are more heavier and more solid racket, then Why are all the pros using TF320's which is has much more lighter feel. Verdasco, Tipsarevic both use the TF 320 of some sort.
Personally, I haven't played with the TF 335 before but the specs look awesome and that's as much as I'm qualified to say about the racquet... because I haven't played with it before! What a concept.
However, everything I have heard about Technifibre is that they make quality products, though you do pay a premium for their strings its nice to see they are offering their racquets at a more competitive price than other top racquet manufacturers.
Verdasco and Tipsarevic are not REALLY using those racquets, it's never accurate to assume something of a racquet by what it looks like the pros are playing on TV.
They sure look like 320's to me. Look at the shape of the racket
any opinions on the heavier end of the tflash series?