Which player has the nicest site and forum?

veroniquem

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
Last edited:
tahiti

tahiti

Professional
The ************* sure is interesting!
Roger's front page I find a little sterile but his forum is great.
Djoko's also got lots of news. I'm not sure what AFAIK's are?
 
seffina

seffina

G.O.A.T.
Heh. It just means "as far as I know".

The too much black on Rafa's site is not very aesthetically pleasing to my eye.
 
tahiti

tahiti

Professional
Are there any other amazing tennis player sites?
AFAIK thanks, they list the tournaments because points were deducted in his rankings for missing Dubai and Benidorm Davis cup starts Friday. Spain - Serbia. Rafa and Djoko.
 
Ludas

Ludas

New User
Clint Thomas by far ;)
Or isn't it up yet? Well in that case it will be the nicest site and forum soon.
 
veroniquem

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
tahiti said:
The ************* sure is interesting!
Roger's front page I find a little sterile but his forum is great.
Djoko's also got lots of news. I'm not sure what AFAIK's are?
Click to expand...
Roger's front page has the weather news on it, gives you an idea about how captivating their main subject is :lol:
 
Oui c'est moi.

Oui c'est moi.

Hall of Fame
Yeah because the weather has nothing to do with outdoor tennis....


I like Novak and Roger's sites. They're more informative (and easier to navigate around). A Murray's is also good.
 
Oui c'est moi.

Oui c'est moi.

Hall of Fame
Yep. The whole point of the 'weather report' (which i find useful) is that you know what the weather etc is like on the day of his matches. Or the day before his match, to give you an idea of what the climate is like for that particular tourney. Something tennis fans are keen to know about prior to a match. Well some hard-core do fans anyway.
 
tahiti

tahiti

Professional
Just general first impressions, first page content, news etc. Does it give an idea of the player?

I like the tour map on Roger's site and that the forum has fewer pictures than Nadals, don't need to scroll too much.

But TW forum rules, true warfare and intelligent discussions :)
 
veroniquem

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
tahiti said:
Just general first impressions, first page content, news etc. Does it give an idea of the player?

I like the tour map on Roger's site and that the forum has fewer pictures than Nadals, don't need to scroll too much.

But TW forum rules, true warfare and intelligent discussions :)
Click to expand...
Yes, TW is the best for discussion! On a fan site I prefer a lot of pictures.The more the better!
 
rubberduckies

rubberduckies

Professional
Novak's and Andy's both look pretty good - polished site designs, lots of information without appearing cluttered, videos, etc.
Nadal's is relatively sparse on info, and the black background was a poor choice.
Federer's site looks like something from geocities in 1999. There's very little multimedia and the Ask Roger thing seems to add like 3 questions a year.
 
tahiti

tahiti

Professional
rubberduckies said:
Novak's and Andy's both look pretty good - polished site designs, lots of information without appearing cluttered, videos, etc.
Nadal's is relatively sparse on info, and the black background was a poor choice.
Federer's site looks like something from geocities in 1999. There's very little multimedia and the Ask Roger thing seems to add like 3 questions a year.
Click to expand...

Nice comments I quite agree! Personally I like Novak's, I can get all his tennis info easily don't have to surf around to different sites. Definitely nice clean overview.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top