PatrickB
Rookie
I took up USTA officiating several years ago, not long after I tore my ACL on court, as a way of staying involved with on-court tennis until my knee healed, and continued it after returning to play through last year, roving and refereeing sectional events and working chairs and lines at ITA (collegiate) events. I did it because it was both enjoyable and challenging, because I was decent at it, because I enjoyed the fellow officials I worked with, and because there was a shortage of local officials and I was able to help out.
Late last year, the USTA informed all certified officials that a new *benefit* we would gain as a USTA official was being required to having a criminal background check done on us before we could work as an official. (I'm not kidding - they told us requiring us to have a criminal background check done was a "benefit".) I thought this was a bit silly and a bit of a waste of our dues money--it's the USTA covering it's rear end in case someone sues them for certifying a Bad Person(TM) as an official--but agreed to do so.
Then I started the process. The USTA hired the private company NCIS to conduct the background checks, and as part of the process you're asked to sign a legal waiver, and unlike most people, I generally read what I'm asked to sign. What the waiver said to this layman is that you waive *all* legal rights to hold NCIS or the USTA responsible for *any* reason related to the background check process, right after giving them a huge amount of sensitive private information. So, they asked me to give them very valuable and sensitive information and affirm that even if they screwed up with it, I wouldn't hold them responsible.
Needless to say, I wasn't willing to sign such an onerous waiver without actually asking some questions, so I did. The NCIS general counsel refused to tell me what the intent of the waiver was, said it spoke for itself, and if I had any concerns about it that I should talk to a lawyer; this didn't really surprise me, as his job is to cover his company's rear end, not to help me.
So I asked the USTA, since they're the ones requiring this background check of their officials, and their job is (supposedly) to serve dues-paying members like me. Unfortunately, the answer was the same. To paraphrase, "the document says what it says", "you should trust NCIS", and "I can't provide you legal advise on this".
So, I can't sign the legal waiver needed to get the background check done, so I can't get a criminal background check done by NCIS, and as a result USTA won't renew my certification as a sectional USTA/ITA official.
It's nice to know that the USTA has such a wealth of high-quality certified officials that it can discard some of the ones it has so casually. Next time you wonder why it's so hard to find a good official when your opponent is cheating at a tournament, playoff, or sectional, well, here's one more reason.
But at least personally, now I'll have more time to actually *play* tennis now as opposed to overruling bad calls, calling foot faults, and giving code violations to hot-headed Boy's 16s, out-of-control ITA players, and 40 year old habitual racquet tossers.
Late last year, the USTA informed all certified officials that a new *benefit* we would gain as a USTA official was being required to having a criminal background check done on us before we could work as an official. (I'm not kidding - they told us requiring us to have a criminal background check done was a "benefit".) I thought this was a bit silly and a bit of a waste of our dues money--it's the USTA covering it's rear end in case someone sues them for certifying a Bad Person(TM) as an official--but agreed to do so.
Then I started the process. The USTA hired the private company NCIS to conduct the background checks, and as part of the process you're asked to sign a legal waiver, and unlike most people, I generally read what I'm asked to sign. What the waiver said to this layman is that you waive *all* legal rights to hold NCIS or the USTA responsible for *any* reason related to the background check process, right after giving them a huge amount of sensitive private information. So, they asked me to give them very valuable and sensitive information and affirm that even if they screwed up with it, I wouldn't hold them responsible.
Needless to say, I wasn't willing to sign such an onerous waiver without actually asking some questions, so I did. The NCIS general counsel refused to tell me what the intent of the waiver was, said it spoke for itself, and if I had any concerns about it that I should talk to a lawyer; this didn't really surprise me, as his job is to cover his company's rear end, not to help me.
So I asked the USTA, since they're the ones requiring this background check of their officials, and their job is (supposedly) to serve dues-paying members like me. Unfortunately, the answer was the same. To paraphrase, "the document says what it says", "you should trust NCIS", and "I can't provide you legal advise on this".
So, I can't sign the legal waiver needed to get the background check done, so I can't get a criminal background check done by NCIS, and as a result USTA won't renew my certification as a sectional USTA/ITA official.
It's nice to know that the USTA has such a wealth of high-quality certified officials that it can discard some of the ones it has so casually. Next time you wonder why it's so hard to find a good official when your opponent is cheating at a tournament, playoff, or sectional, well, here's one more reason.
But at least personally, now I'll have more time to actually *play* tennis now as opposed to overruling bad calls, calling foot faults, and giving code violations to hot-headed Boy's 16s, out-of-control ITA players, and 40 year old habitual racquet tossers.