HEADfamilydynasty
Rookie
It has to be more than the small head size. what are the qualities that give it its amazing control because its more than increase going from 95-90 and its definitely not just the loss of 5 in^2.
A distinct part of the difference is the length of the strings. Because the strings are shorter, the racket plays more precisely. The way the ball comes off the stringbed has to do in large part by the effective stringbed stiffness, which is higher at a given tension (with a given string and given racket flex) with either a smaller head or a more dense string pattern. Therefore as the stringbed is strung incrementally more loose (reducing from, say, 70 pounds down to 40) the stringbed stiffness of the smaller racket will exhibit a greater level of control, while the larger (or more open) head racket will exhibit less control.
^^^Falls in line with what i experience. This is also how a mid feels better on serve right?:neutral:
i see what you're saying in regards to how a racket with a smaller head size or denser string pattern will have a higher stringbed stiffness in comparison to a racket with a large head size or open pattern when both are at the same tension. but i don't understand how lowering the tension would increase control in a mid sized racket in general, and then how lowering the tension would increase control in a mid sized racket but not an over sized racket (why an inverse effect?)
I am not suggesting that the mid has more control at a lower tension than the over at a higher tension (though this is true, and simply calculating the stringbed stiffness assuming identical rackets and string spacing, should give you the break even point where, for example, stringing the mid at 92% of the tension of the oversized racket will give you the same amount of control).
From my experience, mids are more effective on flat 1st serves. You have a much smaller window (height above the net and below the service line) to serve into, and thus control is at a premium. MP's seem to shine on second serves. The sweet spot is larger, which is needed because it's harder to hit the sweet spot on kickers and slices, as the racquet angle is more extreme. You loose some control, but the window is much larger on 2nds. You loose some MPHs on a kick serve motion, and the extra head size gives you a little extra oomph.
Also... +1 on 6-2/6-4/6-0's commentary on string length and deflection angles.
Up to a point increased tension will give any racket more 'control'. Once you reach a certain point the increase in 'control' will be minimal from adding additional tension eventually leading to a point where there is zero increase in 'control' from additional tension. Then at another point greater than the net-zero point (where you have ceased to gain any control), you will actually start losing 'control'.
It is not likely true that a typical mid will have more control at 50lbs than 55lbs. However a mid at 50lbs may very well have more control than a 110 at 55lbs.
Hope this helps clarify
Up to a point increased tension will give any racket more 'control'. Once you reach a certain point the increase in 'control' will be minimal from adding additional tension eventually leading to a point where there is zero increase in 'control' from additional tension. Then at another point greater than the net-zero point (where you have ceased to gain any control), you will actually start losing 'control'.
It is not likely true that a typical mid will have more control at 50lbs than 55lbs. However a mid at 50lbs may very well have more control than a 110 at 55lbs.
Hope this helps clarify