All right. We have a decision. All credit to Mid-Atlantic Section for getting this right.
Here's the complete decision. I have changed the parties' names.
*********************
DECISION OF THE SECTION GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
[Diana] filed a grievance against [Sarah] and [DC league coordinator Jones]. Both [Diana]
and [Sarah] are senior league captains, and the grievance concerned a match their teams
played against each other. One portion of the grievance stated that [Sarah] would not agree
to a lateness penalty when one of her players arrived 7 minutes late for a match. The
other portion stated that [Sarah] advised [Diana], by email, that she would be defaulting
the #3 position. At match time, [Sarah] would not agree to [Diana]’s team winning that
court by default. She stated that inasmuch as [Diana]’s players were not present at
the site, it would be a double default since parties had to be present in order to claim a
default.
[Jones] is the Senior League Coordinator, and he agreed with and supported the
comments made by [Sarah], therefore the grievance was also filed against him.
Both [Sarah] and [Jones] received the Grievance and a request was made for them to file
responses.
On Saturday, August 25th at 1 p.m., the Committee held a conference call. [Diana],
[Sarah and Jones] were on the call, and invited to explain their position to the Committee.
The Committee asked any questions they had, and the participants were asked to hang up.
Prior to the call, the Committee had been forwarded all materials, including but not
limited to the Grievance, Responses and D.C. League Rules. There was much discussion
after the participants hung up.
As far as the lateness penalty issue, they did not feel the rules clearly state there is no
lateness penalty, and they only refer to a 15 minute default rule. National Regulation
1.02 Governance states the Friend At Court Handbook shall apply to all matches played
in USTA Leagues. In that handbook, the lateness penalties are spelled out and therefore
should have applied to the match in question.
The Committee wondered why [Sarah] would advise [Diana] of a default prior to the
match, if it was expected that [Diana] would still bring a full team. Once again, the
Committee felt this issue was not clearly spelled out in the D.C. League Rules. The rules
did not state that players had to be present in order to claim a default. The National Q&A
covers this exact issue:
How should “known defaults” be handled both at the local level and at
Championships?
In the spirit of good sportsmanship and fair play, the opposing team(s)
should be advised of a known default. The defaulting captain will still
be able to designate at what position (2nd singles or 3rd doubles) a
known default will occur.
The Committee was unanimous in granting the Grievances filed by [Diana], and
agreed that the defaulted court should be awarded to [Diana]’s team. They further stated
that in the future, the league rules should spell out the lateness penalties in accordance
with Friend at Court.
Dated August 27th, 2012