As Say Chi Sin Lo said in one of your other threads:
"Technique.
Just trying to save you the trouble of making 50 threads in search of miracle equipment to give you more pop on the serve, instead of practicing and coaching."
It is not so much about the frame or the pattern or the strings although these are all factors.
You don't need advice from anybody here if you can easily serve @ 110mph unless you have a low % of first serve. In that case, post a video in the instruction section.
What is your % of first serve?
I agree with fortun8son and Say Chi Sin Lo, ...."focus on technique is the priority in serving"
I think he's agreeing its mostly technique and etc. Just seeking knowledge re how string patterns can affect play. This is the string forum afterall.
hmm.. I have hard time understanding you point... so why would I have to post my video of serving when I'm trying to ask which string gives you more pops?? Why is my % of serve is important as well??
I thought I posted my message to string forums, maybe you got confused??
Top ten players serve average @ 105-110 mph...you can easily serve at that speed, and you want more pop..... mmmm? I have a hard time understanding your need for more pop
It doesn't make sense to me....again, what is your first serve %?
It isn't just the number of main strings that can increase spin but the spacing of the strings. My original Black Ace (86 sq in headsize) with 16 mains has the widest spacing between the strings of any racket I've played with. It gets more spin naturally (w/same strings and swingpath) than the larger-headed POG mid with only 14 strings or my 16 main 95 sq in Prestige Pro.
For my money, I'd rather be able to put the ball where I want to, so I rely on the lowest possible deflection amount: a closed string pattern and a tight string bed.
what's the major difference between those two patterns?
Which patter is better for serving?
thanks,