Who are the most beautiful actresses of all time?

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Height is an element of proper proportion and someone who is very short can be beautiful, but not one of the most beautiul.

Wood is cute, pretty in a teen kind of way but not very beautiful.



No, the question should be why couldn't someone 5'1 be very beautiful?

Where are you getting this from? There are plenty of beautiful shorter women. And likewise, there are many very tall women who look gangly and ungainly.

You haven't explained why you think height automatically rules out beauty.
 

Peters

Professional
Height is an element of proper proportion and someone who is very short can be beautiful, but not one of the most beautiul.
Well, I disagree. A very beautiful face remains a very beautiful face regardless of whether she's 5'2 or 5'9.

It just seems a random arbitrary rule to say shorter women can't be the most beautiful. There's no logic behind it.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
You're conceding an awful lot if your argument is now reduced to talking about whether one should only consider the face when talking about beauty.

The reality is that if you were to make a set of criteria concerning beauty height would have to be on it.
 

Peters

Professional
But the definition of beauty doesn't need any criteria, it's not an objective thing. It's subjective.

You yourself may think height should be a factor, but others won't. Like myself.

There's no rulebook that exists to define all this.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
If beauty is so subjective, why do psychological tests show that people share roughly the same aesthetic ideas about it.

At dog shows do they all get medals, no, there are criteria that the dogs must meet to be best in show.

For humans, height, large eyes, fulsome lips, etc are pretty universal criteria for beauty. You don't have to share them, but that's it just the same.
 

Peters

Professional
No, that's all a load of nonsense.

Comparing it to dog shows? Are you for real?

There is no technical formula for beauty - otherwise we'd all agree who's the most beautiful. This much should be obvious.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Yes, its a perfectly sensible comparison.

Dogs and humans may share perfect white healthy teeth.

The bodies have to well proportioned, etc.

Humans are just more brutal about these things when it comes to animals.

When we deal with people we just pretend that things like height don't determine what we consider beautiful or not.
 

Peters

Professional
I disagree. It's a natural response to determine beauty - I've yet to see you explain how this isn't the case.

I don't quite understand your obsession with height. I know it's something that I don't consider at all - and I'm not pretending it's not an issue.

Whether you like it or not, your theory only works for you and certain others who think height is important. For everyone else, it's irrelevant.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I don't have an obsession with height. I said it was one important criteria that tended to disqualify Ms Wood from being considered one of the most beautiful actresses of all time.
 

Peters

Professional
And I'm just saying that's a subjective thing, since there are plenty who wouldn't disqualify her for that reason.

I'm just a bit concerned why you think I'm 'pretending' to myself that height doesn't matter. Which is a bizarre statement.
 

hollywood9826

Hall of Fame
Considereing Salma Hayek to me is the hottest actress ever. Her heght withing an inch or two is clsoe enough. And I think she is only like 5 foot 3 or so. Probably shorter in real life.


Height does come into play with someone of moderate or average looks.

Height will make an average looking 5 foot 3 be good lokking if they were 6 foot.

But I havent seen a 6 footer as hot as Salma is.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Yes, the fact that beauty is subjective allows one to call ugly children beautiful with a good conscience.

If Natalie Wood weighed twenty kilos more would she still be considered beautiful?

And if that's a no then why is the fact that she's twenty centimeters on the short side not be a problem?

And if her teeth were cigarette stained?
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Selma Hayek is very attractive, but not stunning. Its another psychological fact that men prefer short curvy women, but that's male insecurity at work.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
You know its seemingly easy to say what a beautiful face is from an image, and it will probably meet rather objective criteria, but how can you judge someone as beautiful if they are not in front of you so that their qualities are completely clear, iincluding of course their height.

Why do movie makers go to extreme lengths to hide the height of short women and men if its not an issue? The reality is that actresses are often on the short side because they're playing people not models, and they're actors and not simply beautiful.
 
Last edited:

hollywood9826

Hall of Fame
Selma Hayek is very attractive, but not stunning. Its another psychological fact that men prefer short curvy women, but that's male insecurity at work.

Well my psychological male insecurity tells me Hayek is #1. I dont think thats changing anytime soon.
 

Peters

Professional
Selma Hayek is very attractive, but not stunning. Its another psychological fact that men prefer short curvy women, but that's male insecurity at work.
Again, silly presumption. I guess we'll leave it there then.

I find it quite interesting though how some people can try and attribute systems and technical analysis to something so subjective - and then arbitrarily assume something random when someone disagrees. It's a little bit... odd in my opinion, but whatever...

Luckily, back in the real world, a woman's height doesn't block her from being beautiful.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Who said they're blocked from anything?

And there are commonly shared perceptions about what constitutes beauty such that it is not simply subjective without of course thereby being objective.

You need to read Kant.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Langoria looking short:

image0191.jpg
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
No I didn't. You can't read. And you can't argue. You just repeat subjective as if you've said something profound when you're simply repeating what passes for the received opinion.



:lol:

You did, you big silly. :lol:

Go back and read your own posts. You couldn't have forgotten them already.
 

heycal

Hall of Fame
Height is a very minor aspect of beauty in a woman. And I'd argue that 5'3" is more attractive than 6' for a gal. I'd say the sweet spot for women is 5'4" to 5'9".

Unless one is freakishly tall or freakishly short, it really don't matter. 5' is not freakishly short, so Natalie Wood is a certified hottie.
 

Peters

Professional
You just repeat subjective as if you've said something profound when you're simply repeating what passes for the received opinion.
Hardly - you never once explained how judging beauty wasn't subjective. The onus is on you to do so.
 

Bengals1

Hall of Fame
Good to see Sharon Tate and Paz Vega getting some love but how has this thread gone 7 pages and nobody's mentioned Megan Fox!?!

megan-fox-hot-and-sweaty.jpg
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
Ornella was terrific and Stefania Sandrelli was something
Somebody mentioned Silvia Kristel? Like Basinger, not extremely beauty but extremely hot
Ah! Jackie Bisset broke many hearts when I was a teen

She looks much like Daniela Hantuchova.
bisset.jpg
 

Bengals1

Hall of Fame
I would also like to submit the following as belonging on that list...


Emma Watson
EW.jpg


Olivia Wilde
13.jpg


Mischa Barton
Mischa-Barton-hot.jpg


Keira Knightly
K4.jpg
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Certified hot, yes, but would I like to photograph her face?, yes, but would I choose her to photograph a figure?, no.




Height is a very minor aspect of beauty in a woman. And I'd argue that 5'3" is more attractive than 6' for a gal. I'd say the sweet spot for women is 5'4" to 5'9".

Unless one is freakishly tall or freakishly short, it really don't matter. 5' is not freakishly short, so Natalie Wood is a certified hottie.
 
Top