What makes Federer's draw so much easier than Djokovic's

Djokovic is capable of losing to Nadal, Federer, Murray, Wawrinka, and a number of other players in his peak. So in a way I agree with you that any draw would be tough for him by virtue of his inability to dominate his rivals, despite claims that he is the best player of his time.

Djokovic got winning h2h against Federer, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka since 2011 till present time. Go back to your cave.
 

President

Legend
Yes, but do we ignore all the things before Djokovic's 2011 or Stan's late 2013 or 2014.

We can't really do that. It's nobody's fault but Djokovic's that he didn't peak before 2011, and even then it was only one truly great year. His USO 2013 final performance wasn't really anything to write home about for example. He played better at the AO in 2008 in all of his matches than he did in that match. Not all of Djokovic's matches post 2011 are better than all of his matches pre 2011. It's not all encompassing like that.

It's kind of the same with Wawrinka because while his peak is better rendering the H2H slightly less important than it was in years previous he still has really crappy matches. He's not exactly the measure of consistency right?

But the real problem here is that Stan is a formidable opponent especially now EVEN on grass. That is the root of this problem. Federer was perhaps a little lucky that Stan had some sort of ailment otherwise he may have won the match at Wimbledon, but because he lost, all of a sudden he is useless on grass and only a legit foe on hard courts, but that is patently false. That is the real problem here that conway is not acknowledging.

My point was that the 14-2 H2H was not indicative at all of how difficult this (likely) upcoming match will be for Federer. Federer may have kicked his *** around for fun in the past, but since Stan got his act together it's been a very tough matchup for Federer.
 

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
Djokovic got winning h2h against Federer, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka since 2011 till present time. Go back to your cave.

Caveman tells me that Novak did not have a single top 10 win for almost an year (2010) and the then World No. 3 served more double faults than aces the whole year.

is that right ?
 

britam25

Hall of Fame
Sure, when it comes to Masters events, Djokovic cares more than anyone else. But he struggles against everyone from Tsonga on clay, Del Potro on grass (their worst respective surfaces) to 33 year old Federer, let alone Nadal and Murray, who have dominated him in slams since mid-2012. Even Dimitrov was a point away from taking their Wimbledon semifinal to 5 sets. Djokovic has proven that he cannot consistently and convincingly beat anyone in the top 16 (maybe apart from Ferrer), so his fans see any and every potential draw as a nightmare for him.

Hmmm, the 7 win streak against Nadal(on 3 surfaces) and the current 5-1 run he has against him, not impressed with that, huh?
 

Chico

Banned
Djokovic is capable of losing to Nadal, Federer, Murray, Wawrinka, and a number of other players in his peak. So in a way I agree with you that any draw would be tough for him by virtue of his inability to dominate his rivals, despite claims that he is the best player of his time.

Sure, when it comes to Masters events, Djokovic cares more than anyone else. But he struggles against everyone from Tsonga on clay, Del Potro on grass (their worst respective surfaces) to 33 year old Federer, let alone Nadal and Murray, who have dominated him in slams since mid-2012. Even Dimitrov was a point away from taking their Wimbledon semifinal to 5 sets. Djokovic has proven that he cannot consistently and convincingly beat anyone in the top 16 (maybe apart from Ferrer), so his fans see any and every potential draw as a nightmare for him.

These "new" trolls. Pathetic.

Nuclear_Facepalm.jpg
 

Tony48

Legend
Past is Past.

R1 : Current Ranking of Matosevic better than Current ranking of Schwarzman

R2 : Current Ranking of Groth better than Current ranking of Mathieu

R3 : Current Ranking of Granollers better than Current ranking of Querrey

R4 : Current Ranking of Agut better than Current ranking of Kohlscreiber

QF : Current Ranking of Dmitrov better than Current ranking of Murray


This whining needs to stop.

Times when ranking was used to define the capabilities of a player = never

Might as well list how much money they make or how long they can hold their breath.
 

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
My point was that the 14-2 H2H was not indicative at all of how difficult this (likely) upcoming match will be for Federer. Federer may have kicked his *** around for fun in the past, but since Stan got his act together it's been a very tough matchup for Federer.

I agree with this.
 

britam25

Hall of Fame
I have already said that no one cares more than Djokovic about masters events. Players are giving him trouble left and right at the slams however. In the past 2.5 years he has won 2 slams. Only 1 more than Federer and Wawrinka, same number as Murray, and 2 fewer than Nadal in the same time period. 2011 is a distant fluke for Djokovic. Since then, he has shown his fans that he struggles against any player in the top 10 (apart from Ferrer) at slams. This is why his fans see any draw as a tough draw.

So, the 7 game winning streak is a "distant fluke, " eh? I would submit that anybody who thinks one player beating another player is a "fluke" is somebody not exactly dripping with tennis acumen, but, be that as it may, you explain away the current 5-1 run by, oh, Novak cares more than Nadal about that. Brilliant. When it suits your purposes, you count 2.5 year, and, when it doesn't-like, the fact that Novak has 1 Slam THIS year, which is as many as anybody else playing, which is more than Fed and Murray, for example, uhhhh, you don't. Why don't you tell us who DOESN'T struggle in the Slams?
 
Lol haw was it conspiracy vs Fed. This was conspiracy vs Djokovic who got the most difficult draws for years and for Nadal who was constantly getting cakewalks. Fed fans turn it vs Fed. LOL. :roll:

You've just proven my point. Novak fans claiming conspiracy against Novak. Fed fans claiming conspiracy against Fed. Rafa fans probably somehow turned always getting Murray in the draw into a conspiracy.

How about, there aren't conspiracies, there are just draws. Sometime you get the lower-ranked players, sometimes you get people who you match up extremely well against, sometimes there are upsets and the draw gets easier.

Novak, Rafa and Fed are all so good and consistent that it is hard to even get a tough draw for them.
 

britam25

Hall of Fame
Again right now:

Dmitrov = Wawrinka
Murray (at his 2014 level) = Berdych

Is there anyone who seriously disputes that. So how is the draw tougher other than a slightly better non factor in the 4th round.

Heck I could see Federer playing well and still possibly losing to Dmitrov or Berdych. I honestly cant see Djokovic losing to Murray right now, or to Wawrinka on a faster court unless he plays pretty poorly. At last years U.S Open Wawrinka played incredibly well and still lost to a subpar Djokovic. Their next 2 meetings on fast courts he played reasonably well and got spanked in both. He can beat an in form Djokovic on slower courts possibly, but not faster ones. Some of that is probably that Djokovic is just a better player than Federer right now, but also suggests considering matchups element as well Federer if anything has the tougher draw.

"Baby Fed," sheeeeeeeeeee-it! Uh, would you care to revise your previous statement, counselor? Remember what I said earlier about Boy Toy being a head case in his own right? I'm not going to sit here and say that I saw that he was gonna get straight setted by, arguably, the Mother of All Head Cases, but today's match was a prime example of what I was talking about. Dmitiov=Stan, ROTFLMAO!!!
 
Last edited:
Sure, when it comes to Masters events, Djokovic cares more than anyone else. But he struggles against everyone from Tsonga on clay, Del Potro on grass (their worst respective surfaces) to 33 year old Federer, let alone Nadal and Murray, who have dominated him in slams since mid-2012. Even Dimitrov was a point away from taking their Wimbledon semifinal to 5 sets. Djokovic has proven that he cannot consistently and convincingly beat anyone in the top 16 (maybe apart from Ferrer), so his fans see any and every potential draw as a nightmare for him.
Nadal lost 3 times in a row to top100+ players at the most prestigious Slam. Nothing that Djokovic has done wasn't even close to a shame like that.
 

britam25

Hall of Fame
Nadal lost 3 times in a row to top100+ players at the most prestigious Slam. Nothing that Djokovic has done wasn't even close to a shame like that.

Don't hit him with logic, it makes his head hurt. Given Dmitrov's disastrous performance today, I suspect he'll be scarce around these parts for awhile.
 
Last edited:

Dave1982

Professional
I have already said that no one cares more than Djokovic about masters events. Players are giving him trouble left and right at the slams however. In the past 2.5 years he has won 2 slams. Only 1 more than Federer and Wawrinka, same number as Murray, and 2 fewer than Nadal in the same time period. 2011 is a distant fluke for Djokovic. Since then, he has shown his fans that he struggles against any player in the top 10 (apart from Ferrer) at slams. This is why his fans see any draw as a tough draw.

Honestly we have just come to assume that anything less than winning a slam is considered a failure for Fed, Nadal & Djokovic. Obviously they are in part victims of their own success having won so many between them in recent times. We are witnessing what I believe will be remembered as a unique era in tennis history, to have 3 absolute legends so far ahead of the field is something we are unlikely to see again for quite some time. Djokovic has shown incredible consistency since 2011, winning a couple of slams (great effort in itself), reaching numerous finals & a current run of 20 odd semi finals...yeah he's really struggling!
 

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
Honestly we have just come to assume that anything less than winning a slam is considered a failure for Fed, Nadal & Djokovic. Obviously they are in part victims of their own success having won so many between them in recent times. We are witnessing what I believe will be remembered as a unique era in tennis history, to have 3 absolute legends so far ahead of the field is something we are unlikely to see again for quite some time. Djokovic has shown incredible consistency since 2011, winning a couple of slams (great effort in itself), reaching numerous finals & a current run of 20 odd semi finals...yeah he's really struggling!

I like posts like these.
 
Top