ericykchan
Rookie
Have been playing VCP 100 and ordered Regna 100... hope it will arrive next week. Is Regna the "pro stock" racket ... for consumers? I wonder if most of yonex pro players actually use Regna tech rackets with different paint job.
2019 Yonex Regna (Japanese exclusive)
- Thread starter kimguroo
- Start date
kimguroo
Legend
No. It’s not pro stock rackets.
No pros use this racket. More like concept racket from Yonex.
ericykchan
Rookie
Thanks. Just thought if no pro player is using Regna or its concept tech after first generation few years ago, that means the concept... failed, or not good enough to help any pro player.
ericykchan
Rookie
I am a 3.0 to 3.5 player who hugs the baseline. Played Regna 100, Yonex ATG850 string at 45lb. I can definitely tell the difference between VCP 100 (strung with Rexis 125 46lb). Regna definitely have that "spring" feel to it. Comparing to VCP 100, Regna 100 is definitely harder to generate spin. However, it is so much more stable and comfortable. I also played Wilson Clash 100, Prince Phantom Pro 100, Pure Aero 2019, and Head 360 Speed Pro within these couple months. Regna definitely the best one out of them, second to be Prince PP 100, then VCP 100, they all strung with Rexis at 46lb (except the regna because Rexis wasn't an option when I got from Japan). I have just resume tennis after about 11 years that's why I am trying out so many racquets these days. Side topic, i have even gotten a couple Yamaha, brand new from the back of a tennis shop. Trying racquets seems even more fun than the actual game.
ElwoodP
New User
Trying many different frames is like the proverbial "rabbit hole". It can be so enjoyable but you can get lost in it. The part I hated (15+ years ago) was getting rid of a frame to quickly because I was "nose blind" to its attributes. Only to think about it later and repurchase it. That being said, if I had the finances right now, I would do it all again. Cheers!
If only I could get all the DR98s I sold back, 4 in total I think! Only have one left now
kimguroo
Legend
Finally got new version of Regna 98.
Racket prices are expensive and not much difference between Japanese and US prices.
I sent my fund when the dollar was strong so it was not a terrible price.
Got slightly used one but it looks new condition. I could wait but the condition was very nice so I decided to get.
The racket was strung with babolat RPM but somewhat reason weight was 333g strung.
I am not sure this racket was customized by Yonex or not. I estimate around 315g instead of 310g.
I like first version paint job of 98 because of durability but Yonex changed paint material for Regna 100.
This paint looks similar to Regna 100 so a little doubtful about the durability.
Hard to to see shaft material because of new PJ but with direct light, I can still see patterns.
Looks like the biggest difference is different string drill pattern. Also soft cover design was changed. Previous version had Velcro style bag but it was less durable because when I put a racket in the bag, I need to stretch the bag material but new soft cover has zipper.
Not sure when I can test the racket but I will post some updates.
Racket prices are expensive and not much difference between Japanese and US prices.
I sent my fund when the dollar was strong so it was not a terrible price.
Got slightly used one but it looks new condition. I could wait but the condition was very nice so I decided to get.
The racket was strung with babolat RPM but somewhat reason weight was 333g strung.
I am not sure this racket was customized by Yonex or not. I estimate around 315g instead of 310g.
I like first version paint job of 98 because of durability but Yonex changed paint material for Regna 100.
This paint looks similar to Regna 100 so a little doubtful about the durability.
Hard to to see shaft material because of new PJ but with direct light, I can still see patterns.
Looks like the biggest difference is different string drill pattern. Also soft cover design was changed. Previous version had Velcro style bag but it was less durable because when I put a racket in the bag, I need to stretch the bag material but new soft cover has zipper.
Not sure when I can test the racket but I will post some updates.
stephenclown
Professional
This frame looks incredible, I want one just for that reason but the price is like buying PT57a's... interesting concept though, heard it plays unlike any other frame but I hit very hard so unsure if it would have any benefit.
kimguroo
Legend
Everyone might be different but I might say “again”.... nothing like Regna because of “spring” like action from shaft.
if I have to pick one...... Probably I might say “blade” but still it’s not really “blade” feel.
You don’t need to buy new one. Japanese used racket condition is very nice.
Yesterday, I saw almost new used racket for 25000 yen. I thought about getting one but I have not test new one yet so passed it. 25000 yen is $235 so it’s almost same price for US racket prices nowadays.
Or previous version prices are $150-230 (used - new).
kimguroo
Legend
I used a buying service. Buy items then they will take care of it. You just pay for the service and they will ship it to my house. I normally use express mail service which is about $30-40 and take 3-7 days depends on season.
GOATn10s
New User
Were you able to make some comparisons between the two? I have the older model(1st gen.) and might be able to get a hold of the latest model. But I wanted to hear your thoughts between the two before I make a purchase.
kimguroo
Legend
I can’t believe I only played tennis once and have not played tennis at all for several weeks because of my crazy schedules. I only can give brief impression.
Also The racket came with RPM string so not sure my impression might change with my main string which is poly tour spin. Anyway, high trajectory, slight more power, slightly more muted and more solid feeling than previous 98 so far.
Solid player racket feeling might derived from extra inner layer for entire racket instead of top of the racket like previous generation. BTW the first generation Regna felt pretty solid already. Previous 98 feels raw and new one feels more refined.
I like previous raw feeling because I can feel the frame action more but new one has refined feeling.
Somewhat sense, I felt like I am using different model. If someone never used Regna before, they might like new version Regna more in my opinion. Probably Yonex used more NAMD material so it made more dampened feeling.
Somewhat reason I feel like swing faster than previous generation.
Previous Regna might be love or hate because stiffer feeling which is actually frame action feel and low trajectory but new Regna has potential that more people might like it but still heavier feeling than same spec rackets from other companies.
Honestly, I did not have extended rallies from double matches. I need to hit more.
GOATn10s
New User
Good to hear! I will probably get a used one at some point. At the moment I have Velocity/Ogsm at 56/54 strung a few months ago. I would like to give your Poly tour spin setup a try. Did you also try the Poly tour fire or Luxilon element in the previous Regna?
kimguroo
Legend
I’ve used first generation Regna for over 4 years and in the beginning, I experimented with strings but I settled with poly tour spin and have not changed.
kimguroo
Legend
I am not sure Yonex still have limited numbers for Regna productions but I believe Yonex produces limited number for Regna. Yonex only produce 200 Regna per a month and complex technology (shaft area) might not allow to produce more than 200 rackets per a month. Honestly, US racket prices are going up so fast and so soon so price of Regna is not that bad nowadays. Any special racket prices are over $300 nowadays so Regna is not that bad prices.
I think Regna line will not make outside of Japan since Yonex can not produce too many Regna rackets.
If anyone is interested in Regna, just use buying service and get used rackets for testing.
First generation used rackets are cheaper nowadays and second generation used rackets are decent price.
ericykchan
Rookie
glad to hear i am not the only one who likes the larger headsize Regna! I put in hybrid (with guts at main) but didn't like it, no spin and ball fly long a lot. Switched to full bed of poly and played very well. what string and tension you use?
yangstein
New User
I have been using Regna when it came out.. It was something different as I mentioned on previous thread... As I am getting used to the frames, they definitely perform
better with lower tension. I used to string full poly bed at 56-57 lbs now it is down to 54 lbs.
What I found interesting about this frame is that when you scratch or chip, the paint job underneath is different. As you can see, there is a fresh white coating under the
frame.... I will share how they are once one of these is broken. It is just time whether I break one or it will break during playing mishitting overheads or something.
Yonex is well known for being fragile and I have been on #yonexnation for more than few decades...
kimguroo
Legend
I thought you did not like Regna and dumped Regna quickly hahaha.
I have been using Regna when it came out.. It was something different as I mentioned on previous thread... As I am getting used to the frames, they definitely perform
better with lower tension. I used to string full poly bed at 56-57 lbs now it is down to 54 lbs.
What I found interesting about this frame is that when you scratch or chip, the paint job underneath is different. As you can see, there is a fresh white coating under the
frame.... I will share how they are once one of these is broken. It is just time whether I break one or it will break during playing mishitting overheads or something.
Yonex is well known for being fragile and I have been on #yonexnation for more than few decades...
I had hard times to adjust first generation Regna and almost gave up but I had no choice to stay since I paid huge money at that time. I had unusual long adjustment period time.
Unfortunately I am too busy to test new Regna more so can not really compare between 1 and 2 generation Regna but definitely, I see some differences.
regarding on the paint, First generation 98 version has better durability because of clear coat.
Yonex changed matte paint for first generation Regna 100 but paint is noticeably less durable.
My first generation 98 has white paint too. Did not know Yonex put primer coat for new versions too since I did not see white paint for my first generation Regna 100....
Yonex Poly Tour Spin @48
kimguroo
Legend
Have you tried first generation 100? If so, can you feel difference between them?
Somewhat reason, I’ve Never clicked with any Yonex 100 version but I have previous Regna 100. Wondering what is differences. It’s too much power for me so I had go up 55lbs main and 52 cross but use 53 main and 50 cross for my 98. Also, I like textured string so I use poly tour spin too.
Sorry, my mistake. The string of Regna 100 is Gosen G-tour 3 (1.23) @48lb.
Poly Tour Spin is on Regna 98 @45lb.
ericykchan
Rookie
Thanks. I had guts hybrid before and didn't like it as much. Recently switched to Volkl v-square 18g at 45lb, the frame gave me a lot more spin and power (i don't have fast swing so can't really supply power on my own).
I didn't use 100 gen1 too much. Because the 4 1/4 grip of gen1 was too large like 4 1/2 for me and the gen1 leather was too hard to hold.
desmondchan
New User
Just passing by and wish to share my feedback on Regna 98 (circa 2019). A bit about myself so my comments could be put into perspective. I am 47, 5ft6, 130lbs, play 4 hours per week on a regular basis, avg 95KM/Hr on both wings on rallies and 150KM/Hr on 1st serve. My goto rackets are various incarnations of "modern" Prestige Mid from LM Mid to XT Rev Pro (except I and MG). I have also play/like Prince's 93P and in order to further improve my ball striking, has recently gone back to the Pacific X Feel Pro 90 (Gen 1 and 2). Regna 98 in G3 is my 1st Yonex. All my rackets are strung with Alu Power 1.25 23/21 KG.
Couple of things that stands out for the Regna 98:
1) Plays similar to a 95 instead of a 98. Sweet spot is not small by any means by definitely not as big as some would assume. My Pro 100P (on paper it's 2 sq in larger) has a MUCH bigger sweet spot by comparison. So it's not as "easy" to play with as some would imagine for a 98
2) As a 16x19, the spin potential is not as great as other "open pattern" equivalent of Prince or Wilson. To launch the ball with a higher trajectory (as compare to traditional mid 18x20) is still easy but not that easy to generate excessive spin. But I see that as a plus of having a "better" control 16 x 19 racket
3) As the bottom of the mains having a 0.1mm distance difference with the top (by design) in order to enlarge the sweet spot, logically the sweet spot is sat a tad towards the arm. For folks like me who tends to mishit toward the top, it takes time to get used to it
4) Vibration dampening is truly exceptional .. maybe it's due to the HM graphite and/or Namd … maybe it's due to material layup … but it remains me of Berdych's personal racket which I had tried before. What it means when most vibration is dampened, then the "feel" of the racket, how it react during swing/impact, becomes very clear and very easy to discern … similar to music that it becomes more 3 dimensional when the background is quiet. To me, this is the most unique thing about the Regna.
More to come later
Couple of things that stands out for the Regna 98:
1) Plays similar to a 95 instead of a 98. Sweet spot is not small by any means by definitely not as big as some would assume. My Pro 100P (on paper it's 2 sq in larger) has a MUCH bigger sweet spot by comparison. So it's not as "easy" to play with as some would imagine for a 98
2) As a 16x19, the spin potential is not as great as other "open pattern" equivalent of Prince or Wilson. To launch the ball with a higher trajectory (as compare to traditional mid 18x20) is still easy but not that easy to generate excessive spin. But I see that as a plus of having a "better" control 16 x 19 racket
3) As the bottom of the mains having a 0.1mm distance difference with the top (by design) in order to enlarge the sweet spot, logically the sweet spot is sat a tad towards the arm. For folks like me who tends to mishit toward the top, it takes time to get used to it
4) Vibration dampening is truly exceptional .. maybe it's due to the HM graphite and/or Namd … maybe it's due to material layup … but it remains me of Berdych's personal racket which I had tried before. What it means when most vibration is dampened, then the "feel" of the racket, how it react during swing/impact, becomes very clear and very easy to discern … similar to music that it becomes more 3 dimensional when the background is quiet. To me, this is the most unique thing about the Regna.
More to come later
looking forward
kimguroo
Legend
I can't believe I just don't have time to play tennis nowadays. only hit a few times since I got a newer version.
new drilling pattern changed sightly. original has more frame action but hardly notice with newer version.
Also it has a higher trajectory than the first version. it's not like technifabre 315ltd 16x19 (old version) but Noticebly, higher than first version which I liked.
Since I played with the first version for a while, I prefer the first version for now (I am a flat hitter so lack of spin does not matter for me) but more people might like new version.....
desmondchan
New User
I have played with my Regna 98 a bit more and added a gram of lead on top of the hoop and let me continue...
5) How the racket feel at impact is truly unique. As I was alluring to in my earlier thread when the "unwanted" vibration got out of the way, how the racket reacts to impact become very "clear" to the hands. It just feel very "refined" on impact. Not harsh or mush but precise. I could also get more information/feel on how the string bed behaves. With no official info on RA, some claim it's on the high 60's (like 65 to 68). I have never liked stiff rackets but I don't find the Regna to be too stiff. It's true the ball stays on the string bed a tad longer with Prestiges Mid (like my XT Rev Pro) but it stays long enough with the Regna as not to lose the feel on where the ball is going. And then … the best thing about the Regna and the reason why it's not like the other 200 rackets I have owned … is the explosiveness it possess at the nano second at impact. Maybe it's the material and or the layup of the graphite or the way Yonex claimed how the shaft is made, I don't know for sure. All I know is mere mortals like me could somehow load up on the ball at the very last moment and hit winners with my 1HBH from the back of the court. I am old, small in size and never able to really kill the ball in a controlled manner (or even with bigger rackets) but now I confess I am addicted because finally I have a racket combining good CONTROLLED power.
6) Another thing to note is it doesn't feel like it cup/pocket on the ball during impact. Say with my FlexiPoint Prestige Mid I could really feel the frame pocket on the ball during the impact which is the sensation I like. But with the Regna, maybe due to how it's built, it feels (still) like a racket and not your palm pocketing the ball. So it's true that when it comes to touch shots, there are better feel rackets out there for sure
7) Looks is subjective but hands on heart the quality of finish is 1st class and really separate itself from all other rackets
8) Racket is also very sensitive to how you set it up. Adding 1 gram on the top of the hoop makes it feel/play quite differently. Also I have played my friend's Regna with Yonex's own poly tour air and it feels very different as well (lots more vibration relatively) so do need time to experiment
So now I have ended up with 3 Regnas and most likely will stick with them for a while before going back to my Prestiges
5) How the racket feel at impact is truly unique. As I was alluring to in my earlier thread when the "unwanted" vibration got out of the way, how the racket reacts to impact become very "clear" to the hands. It just feel very "refined" on impact. Not harsh or mush but precise. I could also get more information/feel on how the string bed behaves. With no official info on RA, some claim it's on the high 60's (like 65 to 68). I have never liked stiff rackets but I don't find the Regna to be too stiff. It's true the ball stays on the string bed a tad longer with Prestiges Mid (like my XT Rev Pro) but it stays long enough with the Regna as not to lose the feel on where the ball is going. And then … the best thing about the Regna and the reason why it's not like the other 200 rackets I have owned … is the explosiveness it possess at the nano second at impact. Maybe it's the material and or the layup of the graphite or the way Yonex claimed how the shaft is made, I don't know for sure. All I know is mere mortals like me could somehow load up on the ball at the very last moment and hit winners with my 1HBH from the back of the court. I am old, small in size and never able to really kill the ball in a controlled manner (or even with bigger rackets) but now I confess I am addicted because finally I have a racket combining good CONTROLLED power.
6) Another thing to note is it doesn't feel like it cup/pocket on the ball during impact. Say with my FlexiPoint Prestige Mid I could really feel the frame pocket on the ball during the impact which is the sensation I like. But with the Regna, maybe due to how it's built, it feels (still) like a racket and not your palm pocketing the ball. So it's true that when it comes to touch shots, there are better feel rackets out there for sure
7) Looks is subjective but hands on heart the quality of finish is 1st class and really separate itself from all other rackets
8) Racket is also very sensitive to how you set it up. Adding 1 gram on the top of the hoop makes it feel/play quite differently. Also I have played my friend's Regna with Yonex's own poly tour air and it feels very different as well (lots more vibration relatively
) so do need time to experiment So now I have ended up with 3 Regnas and most likely will stick with them for a while before going back to my Prestiges
kimguroo
Legend
Most of people has similar experience for initial hitting with Regna.
Vibrations are unique feel of shaft action (spring like feeling). It will be gone when you hit a few session.
If you hit less spin shot, you might like first version more ^_^. The first version gives very low trajectory than 2nd version.
honestly first 98 paint job is the best. Yonex changed paint job for previous 100 version but durability went down and did not change paint material for the second version.
Adding weight for Regna makes very heavy feeling in my experiments especially the first generation. Extra layers in side top of racket makes heavier feeling but second generation was changed. Extra layer has entire hoop.
agree with strings. I tried various strings and almost gave up the racket then settled with poly tour spin.
If you hit one hand backhand 100 version might give extra good one hand backhand hahahaha. I don’t know why but often, I want to have fun with one hand backhand and 100 gives better one hand backhand than 98 haha.
have a fun with the racket ^_^
Vibrations are unique feel of shaft action (spring like feeling). It will be gone when you hit a few session.
If you hit less spin shot, you might like first version more ^_^. The first version gives very low trajectory than 2nd version.
honestly first 98 paint job is the best. Yonex changed paint job for previous 100 version but durability went down and did not change paint material for the second version.
Adding weight for Regna makes very heavy feeling in my experiments especially the first generation. Extra layers in side top of racket makes heavier feeling but second generation was changed. Extra layer has entire hoop.
agree with strings. I tried various strings and almost gave up the racket then settled with poly tour spin.
If you hit one hand backhand 100 version might give extra good one hand backhand hahahaha. I don’t know why but often, I want to have fun with one hand backhand and 100 gives better one hand backhand than 98 haha.
have a fun with the racket ^_^
desmondchan
New User
Thanks Kimguroo. The reason for me to go for 98 instead of 100 is I am old school (or stubborn). I always believe one should play with the heaviest racket he/she can handle so the racket does more of the work instead of the body so in the long term it offers more protection to arms/joints. My game, being limited by my physique, has always based on precision and not power so smaller head size works better for me. As someone who has always play with 93 sq in / 350 grams, changing to Regna 98 (98/330g+) is already a huge change I need to adapt. Changing to 100 (100/295g) will be just too much of a change for me
If I come across a good condition Regna 98 (previous version) in G3, I will buy it and compare with the current version, just to satisfy my own curiosity … ha ha …
Thanks for sharing
If I come across a good condition Regna 98 (previous version) in G3, I will buy it and compare with the current version, just to satisfy my own curiosity … ha ha …
Thanks for sharing
ericykchan
Rookie
You can definitely try Lafino. I got two rackets from them (I live outside of Japan). The purchase process is a bit hard to follow but definitely reliable.
tsamo
Semi-Pro
When you bought from them how long did it take for you to receive your order and what was your experience with the customs?
I was browsing their shop and I saw some really high prices.
Babolat Pure Strike 100 255€!!
Wilson Blade 100 UL V7.0 240€!!
ericykchan
Rookie
Since I live in Hong Kong, it was relatively quick. It took 5 days from placed order to the racket on my hand. Given even Nintendo is pausing Switch shipments, I suspect it will take a much longer time to ship anything from Japan.
The prices are high for those non-exclusive models, but for Regna or other Japan exclusive modes (another one is Prince X100), the price is not too bad, i.e. close to suggested retail price by the manufacturer.
Kurt0707
Rookie
Regna specs looks like a more stable and bigger sweetspot of Vcore 95, which I love playing with, but modified quite a bit. I love the feel of Vcore 95, so how does Regna 98 compare to interms of comfort and feel to Vcore 95, probably not as plush with RA of 64-65 but a little more crisper?
I love Yonex so I will probably have to get one and try this... sounds amazing..
Last edited:
Kurt0707
Rookie
Regna 98 is tempting me! Any comparisons to the Vcore Pro 97 310?
Thoughts on power, spin, feel and ease of use would be greatly appreciated.
I briefly tried Vcore Pro 97 310, Regna 98 2019 has more power (also depends on strings of course), more comfort and easier to use, maybe a bit less control as would be expected from a thicker beam and slightly more open pattern, but still very good. Spin was about the same for me, but I have more of a flat game. Its really a special frame, especially if you like Yonex.
Phantasm
Semi-Pro
Guessing its the new Vcore lineup since its been 2 years since the last update. Nishioka and some other sponsored pros are endorsing the new gray paint job at the US open already.
XFactorer
Hall of Fame
Those are just limited edition paint jobs. They have them on Yonex Japan's website. They're pretty cool. I'd be down for a softer VCORE... the current version really tears up my wrists.
Crashbaby
Semi-Pro
It is low volume racquet with only a few hundred a month being able to be produced according to early remarks made in this thread. I don’t believe that Yonex can supply something as large as the US market with this particular stick. Shame, because I’d love to try one!
XFactorer
Hall of Fame
Well, then it's probably the next iteration of the VCOREs.... I suppose we'll find out soon enough. I'm wondering if it will be an announcement with a "in stock" date of sometime in a month or two...
408tennisguy
Semi-Pro
The Regna 98 and 100 have been released
Addxyz
Hall of Fame
Is this for sure the 2019 2nd version?
