Best Technique

TeamOB

Professional
If you were to write a tennis textbook and had to pick one player to demonstrate all the shots in the book, who would it be? My pick would be Marat Safin. All his shots seemed very simple, efficient and effective.
 
If you were to write a tennis textbook and had to pick one player to demonstrate all the shots in the book, who would it be? My pick would be Marat Safin. All his shots seemed very simple, efficient and effective.

i agree. but then again i do just love watching him :D favourite to watch second is dolgopoliv.
 

downdaline

Professional
I would also add Tomas Berdych to the list.

His strokes are textbook and he makes very clean contact with the ball.
 

jiddy-p

Semi-Pro
Federer and Berdych. But I would choose Federer because he is the most texbook player of all time. No player in history has the level of technical perfection that he has.
 
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
Live, Federer's backhand looks a touch flaky and precarious -- one gets an extra appreciation for why the stroke goes through periods of fallibility.

In a way, it seems to not always quite be wholly connected.
 

captainbryce

Hall of Fame
If it was just ONE player to demonstrate all shots, Roger Federer! However, ideally I'd pick different players to demonstrate all the various shots.

1. First Serve - John Isner
2. Second Serve - Pete Sampras
3. First Serve Return - Novak Djokovic
4. Second Serve Return - Andre Agassi
5. Crosscourt Forehand - Roger Federer
6. Inside Out Forehand - Juan Martin Del Potro
7. One-Handed Backhand - Stanislas Wawenrka
8. Two-Handed Backhand - David Nalbandian
9. Net Volley - Stefan Edberg
10. Half Volley - Roger Federer
11. Drop Volley - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
12. Dive Volley - Boris Becker
13. Dropshot - Andre Agassi
14. Topspin Lob - Lleyton Hewitt
15. Overhead Smash - Pete Sampras
 
If it was just ONE player to demonstrate all shots, Marat Safin! However, ideally I'd pick different players to demonstrate all the various shots.

1. First Serve - scud
2. Second Serve - Pete Sampras
3. First Serve Return - hewitt
4. Second Serve Return - Andre Agassi
5. Crosscourt Forehand - Roger Federer
6. Inside Out Forehand - Juan Martin Del Potro
7. One-Handed Backhand - Stanislas Wawenrka/gasquet
8. Two-Handed Backhand - safin
9. Net Volley - Stefan Edberg
10. Half Volley - Roger Federer
11. Drop Volley - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
12. Dive Volley - Boris Becker
13. Dropshot - Andre Agassi
14. Topspin Lob - Lleyton Hewitt
15. Overhead Smash - Pete Sampras


ive changed a few to be where i think they should be.

I think marat safins backhand is just the most beautiful piece of artwork i have ever seen. it is just stunning. his forehand is technically very sound aswell the only thing he didnt have working for him is his mentality on court it was rather shaky.
 
Last edited:

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.
Federer and Berdych. But I would choose Federer because he is the most texbook player of all time. No player in history has the level of technical perfection that he has.

What exactly is the definition of textbook? I don't see how Federer's forehand and backhand are even remotely close to being textbook. Especially the forehand with all that wrist movement and vicious racquet head speed. Its a brilliant stroke, but it is a complex stroke.


In comparison, someone like Agassi deserves the title for being the most "textbook" player of all time. He just took the racquet back and swung from both sides; no huge takeback, no extreme knee bend, not wristy etc.
 

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
...Its a brilliant stroke, but it is a complex stroke.
TommyLeeJonesNotSureIfSerious_zpsb2fec297.jpg
 

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.

You don't think so? I haven't seen anyone hit forehands like Federer did. I remember during the 2003 Wimblddon SF, Federer used nothing but wrist to crush a forehand over the highest part of the net from inside the surface box. His racquet head acceleration was so incredible that he could hit shots like that comfortably. The only guy who I have seen hit shots like that is Nadal. I think of Federers forehand like a signature shot of his.
 

gambitt

Banned
11. Drop Volley - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga

So with plenty of great multiple slam champion volleyers (volliers?) from the 80's/90's, you instead pick a ball basher whop redominantly plays from the baseline and has never won anything significant as the person with the best drop volley.
 

The-Champ

Legend
Shots that I think look perfect:

Serve, both 1st and 2nd - Pete Sampras

FH - Agassi (Today we see Fedal hit their fh and we say WOW! I wonder if we still would have said WOW had they played 25 years ago).

BH - Agassi

Return - Agassi

Volley (BH) - Edberg

Volley (FH) - Mac

Slice - Federer

Lobs - Nadal (People would say Hewitt, but Nadal is better IMO. Nobody can execute a slice bh lob with precision as this guy when on defense).
 
Last edited:
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
Nadal has a great slice backhand lob on the run and decent lobs in general, but I find that to be an odd choice. Djokovic has a better general lob than Nadal and also does well with defensive lobs stretched wide. Guys like Hewitt and Lendl had generally superior lobs that they used much more frequently.. more road tested.

Nadal best lobs around.. hmmm..
 
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
If Nadal is going to be picked for best technique on a particular stroke which can be emulated unlike say his forehand which is very idiosyncratic, why not his forehand overhead -- it's supreme.
 

TeamOB

Professional
IMO Federer's strokes should be in a museum and not a textbook. Nobody else has ever hit like him. Guys like Safin, Djokovic and Agassi are better suited to a textbook. They have really no-frills strokes but have mastered them to the highest degree.
 

royroy85

Rookie
Juan Carlos Ferrero. Small built so no free power. Great footwork... and a good head above the shoulders. Could play on any surface...
 

captainbryce

Hall of Fame
So with plenty of great multiple slam champion volleyers (volliers?) from the 80's/90's, you instead pick a ball basher whop redominantly plays from the baseline and has never won anything significant as the person with the best drop volley.
I don't base my decisions on playing style or career milestones, only on the shot itself. Can you name an active player that has a better drop volley than Tsonga? :confused:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJSpOvozUhI

If anything, I'd say that because he's a baseline player, that tends to make the shot even more effective (people aren't expecting him to do it).
 

captainbryce

Hall of Fame
Nadal has a great slice backhand lob on the run and decent lobs in general, but I find that to be an odd choice. Djokovic has a better general lob than Nadal and also does well with defensive lobs stretched wide. Guys like Hewitt and Lendl had generally superior lobs that they used much more frequently.. more road tested.

Nadal best lobs around.. hmmm..
I agree. In fact, Nadal wouldn't even be in my top 3 of best lobs among active players, let alone of all time.

Among active players, the best lobs are:

1. Lleyton Hewitt
2. Andy Murray
3. Roger Federer
4. Novak Djokovic
5. Rafael Nadal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5PyPDCCAaE

Among best players of all time:

1. Lleyton Hewitt
2. Andre Agassi
3. Michael Chang
4. Pete Sampras
5. Jimmy Conners

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM9GKm9M6no
 

Bobby Jr

G.O.A.T.
You don't think so? I haven't seen anyone hit forehands like Federer did. I remember during the 2003 Wimblddon SF, Federer used nothing but wrist to crush a forehand over the highest part of the net from inside the surface box.
No really imo. We never saw anyone hit a serve like Sampras's or a 2hbh like Agassi's either if you get specific with technique.

Federer's forehand is quite lacking in unnecessary movements compared to most imo. It's also not wristy most of the time, it just appears so because of how laid back it is. The wrist is passive during the contact phase generally. Being able to crush forehands from inside the service box is technique but also sheer self-confidence (and, to be fair, the benefit of strings which offer miles more spin than the majority of rec players can fathom).

Insofar as others having similar forehands I'm not sure that is a deal breaker for deciding whether someone is 'textbook'. Textbooks get rewritten all the time and his for a long, long time has been a benchmark of effortlessness (a prerequisite for being textbook imo), effective in all circumstances and with a broader than most ability to vary the shot (pace/spin). It may not be the last iteration of excellence but there are few which could make a better claim. I can't think of one.
 

President

Legend
+1

Nalbandian had something, like Federer, the word is art.

His technique is more easily replicable than Federer's though IMO, more solid overall. Federer's technique has a lot of moving parts (and yes, IMO his forehand is a very complicated shot if you really break it down) and that backhand is not ideal, there are better one handers to imitate. Nalbandian's technique on every shot (his volleys are/were better technically than Federer too IMO) was completely solid. And the backhand was better than Agassi, Djokovic, or Murray. The extra spin creates possibilities that aren't available to most, but doesn't make the shot less solid IMO.
 

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.
that backhand is not ideal, there are better one handers to imitate. Nalbandian's technique on every shot (his volleys are/were better technically than Federer too IMO) was completely solid.

Nalbandian's forehand was no more ideal to copy than Federer's backhand; I can name 10 guys who have a better forehand.That shot was either a winner or unforced error machine. I was watching him his match against Agassi from 2003 the other day and it was ridiculous how much more solid Agassi's forehand was than his. Nalbandian was shanking and hitting loopers to deal with Agassi's depth on forehand shots.

And we have heard it all before. Hewitt, Nadal, Murray and about 12 others guys on the ATP have better volleys than Federer technically, but too bad it doesn't do jack for their games and Federer has proven himself to be a far better net player than all of them.
 
Last edited:

aer0pr0

Rookie
best technique overall : thomas berdych

its absurd, he put no effort whatsoever in his strokes, and still his ball is fast and really heavy
 

President

Legend
Nalbandian's forehand was no more ideal to copy than Federer's backhand; I can name 10 guys who have a better forehand.That shot was either a winner or unforced error machine. I was watching him his match against Agassi from 2003 the other day and it was ridiculous how much more solid Agassi's forehand was than his. Nalbandian was shanking and hitting loopers to deal with Agassi's depth on forehand shots.

And we have heard it all before. Hewitt, Nadal, Murray and about 12 others guys on the ATP have better volleys than Federer technically, but too bad it doesn't do jack for their games and Federer has proven himself to be a far better net player than all of them.

Being a great net player (in terms of actual execution) not what this thread is about though, as I understand it. I think Nalbandian's technique on both his forehand and volleys would be great to put in a tennis "textbook", that he could sometimes execute poorly (as do many players) doesn't mean that the technique was bad. That forehand was a standard, simple, and solid shot IMO. Federer's shots are generally more complicated and not suitable for imitation (mostly the backhand and volleys). I'm not saying he is a worse player than Nalbandian by any means! That would be ridiculous.
 

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.
Being a great net player (in terms of actual execution) not what this thread is about though, as I understand it. I think Nalbandian's technique on both his forehand and volleys would be great to put in a tennis "textbook", that he could sometimes execute poorly (as do many players) doesn't mean that the technique was bad. That forehand was a standard, simple, and solid shot IMO. Federer's shots are generally more complicated and not suitable for imitation (mostly the backhand and volleys). I'm not saying he is a worse player than Nalbandian by any means! That would be ridiculous.

Federer's volleys are unique and Mcenroe and Henman have mentioned that he likes to get too crafty with them which leads to horrific errors. I could see Nalbandian being more textbook in his volleys, but I wouldn't say he has better volleys. I have never seen Nalbandian volley as well as Federer (when he is in form) consistently in a match. And I'm not talking about kodak moments, even Roddick hit some impeccable volleys in his time, I'm talking about matches like Wimbledon 2012 where Federer was hitting sick drop and drive volleys the whole match.

And Nalbandian's forehand might be good, but like Federer's backhand, there are better versions of the same shot to imitate. Agassi, for example, had a much better and cleaner looking forehand than Nalbandian did. Berdych as well, if you are using standard, simple, and solid as your criteria.
 
Last edited:

PhrygianDominant

Hall of Fame
Federer's volleys are unique and Mcenroe and Henman have mentioned that he likes to get too crafty with them which leads to horrific errors. I could see Nalbandian being more textbook in his volleys, but I wouldn't say he has better volleys. I have never seen Nalbandian volley as well as Federer (when he is in form) consistently in a match. And I'm not talking about kodak moments, even Roddick hit some impeccable volleys in his time, I'm talking about matches like Wimbledon 2012 where Federer was hitting sick drop and drive volleys the whole match.

And Nalbandian's forehand might be good, but like Federer's backhand, there are better versions of the same shot to imitate. Agassi, for example, had a much better and cleaner looking forehand than Nalbandian did. Berdych as well, if you are using standard, simple, and solid as your criteria.

I will offer a counter argument. Federer does have some idiosyncracies to his volley technique that make him less than an ideal copy. He has his shoulders too open at contact on the forehand volley. He slices his backhand volley a bit too much. I am speaking "in general" or "on average". It would take you 5 minutes to find an example of him doing it properly, but he has a tendency to do it wrong which makes him a less than perfect example for volleys.

I feel the same way about his backhand and how he straightens his arm too late.

If I had to pick one player I would probably pick Agassi. Nalbandian's serve is the problem for me, everything else is fine. Federer is still a great example on the forehand because he gets such good extension with a WW motion.

If you can pick individual players for individual strokes, then all hell breaks lose. Do we differentiate slice lobs and topspin lobs? How about different serves? Flat/aggressive vs. Topspin/defensive forehands? Need I go on?
 
Last edited:

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Live, Federer's backhand looks a touch flaky and precarious -- one gets an extra appreciation for why the stroke goes through periods of fallibility.

In a way, it seems to not always quite be wholly connected.

It's odd that, for someone who comes across as a knowledgeable poster, you sometimes seem to have amnesia when it comes to Federer's ability displayed in his period of peak dominance.
 

Sid_Vicious

G.O.A.T.
It's odd that, for someone who comes across as a knowledgeable poster, you sometimes seem to have amnesia when it comes to Federer's ability displayed in his period of peak dominance.

It is a totally legitimate statement. Even in Federer's prime, his backhand did break down every now and then. For proof, just rewatch the 2005 USO SF and Final against Hewitt and Agassi, respectively. Prime Federer shanked about 50 or more backhands in that match. It was no secret. Everyone knew that Federer's backhand was much weaker throughout his entire career. Agassi even recollected Federer's erratic shots of the backhand in his autobiography which he credited it for letting him back in the match.

I was watching the 2005 AO SF recently and Federer couldn't touch Safin in backhand to backhand rallies. He always was the first one to lose ground and promptly threw in quality slices, which more than made up for his topspin backhand.
 
Last edited:

Maximagq

Banned
Djokovic's volleys aren't that bad, and today's tennis is mostly baseline so his groundies are definitely examples of good technique. Don't watch his backhand lurch slice or overhead though!
 

Sreeram

Professional
I will go for David nalbandian or Andy Murray (excluding serve). To me a Andy's shots are so simple and can be replicated with decent skills.
 
Top