If you were to write a tennis textbook and had to pick one player to demonstrate all the shots in the book, who would it be? My pick would be Marat Safin. All his shots seemed very simple, efficient and effective.
David Nalbandian.
If it was just ONE player to demonstrate all shots, Marat Safin! However, ideally I'd pick different players to demonstrate all the various shots.
1. First Serve - scud
2. Second Serve - Pete Sampras
3. First Serve Return - hewitt
4. Second Serve Return - Andre Agassi
5. Crosscourt Forehand - Roger Federer
6. Inside Out Forehand - Juan Martin Del Potro
7. One-Handed Backhand - Stanislas Wawenrka/gasquet
8. Two-Handed Backhand - safin
9. Net Volley - Stefan Edberg
10. Half Volley - Roger Federer
11. Drop Volley - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
12. Dive Volley - Boris Becker
13. Dropshot - Andre Agassi
14. Topspin Lob - Lleyton Hewitt
15. Overhead Smash - Pete Sampras
Federer and Berdych. But I would choose Federer because he is the most texbook player of all time. No player in history has the level of technical perfection that he has.
...Its a brilliant stroke, but it is a complex stroke.
11. Drop Volley - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Federer, Djokovic, or Davydenko
I don't base my decisions on playing style or career milestones, only on the shot itself. Can you name an active player that has a better drop volley than Tsonga?So with plenty of great multiple slam champion volleyers (volliers?) from the 80's/90's, you instead pick a ball basher whop redominantly plays from the baseline and has never won anything significant as the person with the best drop volley.
I agree. In fact, Nadal wouldn't even be in my top 3 of best lobs among active players, let alone of all time.Nadal has a great slice backhand lob on the run and decent lobs in general, but I find that to be an odd choice. Djokovic has a better general lob than Nadal and also does well with defensive lobs stretched wide. Guys like Hewitt and Lendl had generally superior lobs that they used much more frequently.. more road tested.
Nadal best lobs around.. hmmm..
No really imo. We never saw anyone hit a serve like Sampras's or a 2hbh like Agassi's either if you get specific with technique.You don't think so? I haven't seen anyone hit forehands like Federer did. I remember during the 2003 Wimblddon SF, Federer used nothing but wrist to crush a forehand over the highest part of the net from inside the surface box.
David Nalbandian.
+1
Nalbandian had something, like Federer, the word is art.
that backhand is not ideal, there are better one handers to imitate. Nalbandian's technique on every shot (his volleys are/were better technically than Federer too IMO) was completely solid.
Being 2m tall probably has something to do with how effortless he makes it look.best technique overall : thomas berdych
its absurd, he put no effort whatsoever in his strokes, and still his ball is fast and really heavy
Nalbandian's forehand was no more ideal to copy than Federer's backhand; I can name 10 guys who have a better forehand.That shot was either a winner or unforced error machine. I was watching him his match against Agassi from 2003 the other day and it was ridiculous how much more solid Agassi's forehand was than his. Nalbandian was shanking and hitting loopers to deal with Agassi's depth on forehand shots.
And we have heard it all before. Hewitt, Nadal, Murray and about 12 others guys on the ATP have better volleys than Federer technically, but too bad it doesn't do jack for their games and Federer has proven himself to be a far better net player than all of them.
Being a great net player (in terms of actual execution) not what this thread is about though, as I understand it. I think Nalbandian's technique on both his forehand and volleys would be great to put in a tennis "textbook", that he could sometimes execute poorly (as do many players) doesn't mean that the technique was bad. That forehand was a standard, simple, and solid shot IMO. Federer's shots are generally more complicated and not suitable for imitation (mostly the backhand and volleys). I'm not saying he is a worse player than Nalbandian by any means! That would be ridiculous.
Federer's volleys are unique and Mcenroe and Henman have mentioned that he likes to get too crafty with them which leads to horrific errors. I could see Nalbandian being more textbook in his volleys, but I wouldn't say he has better volleys. I have never seen Nalbandian volley as well as Federer (when he is in form) consistently in a match. And I'm not talking about kodak moments, even Roddick hit some impeccable volleys in his time, I'm talking about matches like Wimbledon 2012 where Federer was hitting sick drop and drive volleys the whole match.
And Nalbandian's forehand might be good, but like Federer's backhand, there are better versions of the same shot to imitate. Agassi, for example, had a much better and cleaner looking forehand than Nalbandian did. Berdych as well, if you are using standard, simple, and solid as your criteria.
Live, Federer's backhand looks a touch flaky and precarious -- one gets an extra appreciation for why the stroke goes through periods of fallibility.
In a way, it seems to not always quite be wholly connected.
It's odd that, for someone who comes across as a knowledgeable poster, you sometimes seem to have amnesia when it comes to Federer's ability displayed in his period of peak dominance.
The man with the perfect game. The king of tennis. The king of Melbourne Park.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQV6xGj43JU