I heard that most of the women on the team have quit and/or transferred. Anybody know what is going on?
The new coach came in and kicked two girls off of the team for excessive partying. Then, she recruited two girls off of the club team who had no business playing varsity. As far as we speculate (my teammates and I, one of whom is close friends with a girl that starts for them) the coach is trying to bring in a foreign recruiting class, as that's what she did at her previous school.
Is it true that the other players have quit?
My daughter and I have visited there looking at different schools. If that many players have quit, that throws up a red flag about the coach.
Would not be so quick, it could be a cultural change that was needed when a new coach comes in, would not be so quick to judge a coach by an inherited team.
There is something wrong with the picture. You have to try to go 0-17.
I think there is something definitely wrong. Under the former coach, BG always had very competitive teams. The coach and players always seemed to handle themselves with class. This year they weren't even competitive in most matches.
I think there is something definitely wrong. Under the former coach, BG always had very competitive teams. The coach and players always seemed to handle themselves with class. This year they weren't even competitive in most matches.
I’m a little familiar with the situation and there is something definitely wrong. I know a couple of the players and their families pretty well. Both are very nice young ladies - hard workers and very respectful. I’ve been around them enough and watched them play junior tournaments that I know their character.
According to them, there is lots of bullying and verbal abuse from the coach. It started early in the fall season when one player wasn’t moving her feet to suit the coach so she made that player drop her racquet and run around the court the rest of practice to humiliate her. She had to run for 2 hours. That seems excessive to me.
I think all the players and some parents have met with the AD to discuss the situation. I think most of the team has complained about the bullying and verbal abuse but the coach has denied everything. The AD’s position is that none of the allegations can be proven so the coach is staying. He appears to be taking the word of the coach above the word of all the players and parents.
I know that one girl transferred at the end of the first semester and 4 more have recently asked for their releases. I think they all were tired of the abuse.
I think Doubles' post is right. At her last coaching job (Murray St.), they went from having one international player on the team when she arrived to having an almost all international team when she left after 2 years. It appears the same thing is going to happen at Bowling Green.
There is something wrong with the picture. You have to try to go 0-17.
I think there is something definitely wrong. Under the former coach, BG always had very competitive teams. The coach and players always seemed to handle themselves with class. This year they weren't even competitive in most matches.
Doubles is correct. They didn't purposely try and lose matches - they just didn't have the team to win. At one point in the season, they had 3 club players and a walk-on starting. Also, I think it was hard for the girls to be really motivated because they knew they were going to be criticized for their play.
Constructive criticism is good and is welcomed by the players. If it goes beyond that it can be disheartening.
I know nothing about this situation. It sounds like the sort of thing where the coach tells the AD upon their hiring that they will completely revamp the roster, so bear with the blows that come to the administration if you want the coach.
It is very hard to non-renew a scholarship at a school like BG. Kid will almost always win an appeal and you're stuck eating a scholarship for a kid you don't want. The alternative is to make it an unpleasant environment so the kids you don't want to be there just quit.
Debate the ethics of that, but this is D1 sports. Coaches don't get paid to have crappy teams of nice kids. They're expected to get results. This would be one way to go about it, agree with it or not.
Did the coach and AD grant the releases? All the drama aside that's the least the AD and coach could do for the players wanted to depart.
Coaches at universities are kings, athletes are servants. Morals and ethics are sometimes not always most important thing. Sometimes athletes get pushed out. An unfair life lesson learned at a young age.
The coach is a woman.I agree with that. But I guess what surprises me in this situation is that this is a new coach with very little track record. I can actually understand (even though I don't agree) why a school would want to keep a successful coach even though they bully players (Bobby Knight at Indiana Univ. and Mike Rice at Rutgers). When the evidence came out on these two, they were dismissed of their duties.
In the situation at Bowling Green, this first-year coach inherited a good team and they finished the season 0-17. How is that for a track record? It's bad enough what the coach has done but the Athletic Director has repeatedly been told about the coach's behavior has refused to do anything. IMO he is as much to blame as the coach since he knows about it. He has the authority to stop it but won't.
The coach is a woman.
The girl who played #1 for most of the year has left the program judging by their roster. Local girl who was very excited about going to BG and a very strong player. Great family from just up the road, too bad it did not work out for her.
Much better program from what I hear as well. I attempted to recruit her out of high school to a smaller college, very happy for her to move on and get away from BG situation.
This looks like a clean house situation. Give the new coach a couple of years to bring in players (probably foreign). If they are losing then the coach will be fired.
Why should the AD give a coach a couple of years to abuse players?
Because BG obviously couldn't care less about their women's program. Still mind boggling team goes 0-17 and HC keeps job. Strong statement there.
Because BG obviously couldn't care less about their women's program. Still mind boggling team goes 0-17 and HC keeps job. Strong statement there.
Because BG obviously couldn't care less about their women's program. Still mind boggling team goes 0-17 and HC keeps job. Strong statement there.
The new coach came in and kicked two girls off of the team for excessive partying. Then, she recruited two girls off of the club team who had no business playing varsity. As far as we speculate (my teammates and I, one of whom is close friends with a girl that starts for them) the coach is trying to bring in a foreign recruiting class, as that's what she did at her previous school.
Team doesn't look as strong as last year. Top 6 girls left from last year's team and the new recruits don't look any better. Since they were winless last year, coach has scheduled weaker teams in an effort to win some matches and make everyone think they have improved. They may do better than 0-17 (it would be hard not to with their schedule} but, overall, I don't think they will be as good as last year. If the coach wouldn't have run her 6 best players off, they probably would do pretty well this year.
Because BG obviously couldn't care less about their women's program. Still mind boggling team goes 0-17 and HC keeps job. Strong statement there.
She's probably got another year or two on her leash. Since she doubled her wins from last year, she could position that with the AD to be the trend each year. Heck 4-15 next year, 8-11 2017-18, then boom 16-5 and a tourney appearance in 2018-19. What a plan! LOLI'm interested to see what the AD will do about the coach. 0-17 last year. 2-19 this year with the recruits the coach wanted and they weren't even competitive in most matches. Two-year record of 2-36! Need I say more?
They only graduated one, the two walk-ons from the last two seasons likely won't play next year. My guess is that the lineup will be almost entirely international next season. It also amazes me how the girl that played one was so successful given that she looks like she's never played a sport in her life. Just goes to show how talent can make up for what appears to be some lacking athleticism.I think you were correct on your prediction. Season is over and they finished with a record of 2-19. The girl that played #1 had a pretty solid year but they didn't have the players from top to bottom. Like you said, if the coach wouldn't have run their 6 best players off, they would have done pretty well.
I think you were correct on your prediction. Season is over and they finished with a record of 2-19. The girl that played #1 had a pretty solid year but they didn't have the players from top to bottom. Like you said, if the coach wouldn't have run their 6 best players off, they would have done pretty well.
She's probably got another year or two on her leash. Since she doubled her wins from last year, she could position that with the AD to be the trend each year. Heck 4-15 next year, 8-11 2017-18, then boom 16-5 and a tourney appearance in 2018-19. What a plan! LOL
They only graduated one, the two walk-ons from the last two seasons likely won't play next year. My guess is that the lineup will be almost entirely international next season. It also amazes me how the girl that played one was so successful given that she looks like she's never played a sport in her life. Just goes to show how talent can make up for what appears to be some lacking athleticism.
She was apparently terrible to play for, so maybe thats not a bad thing.I saw where the head coach resigned yesterday. I guess a 2-36 record for two years didn't cut it.