Career Slams won by year-end top5

[Lew II]

1973 - 19
1974 - 41
1975 - 27
1976 - 22
1977 - 24
1978 - 31
1979 - 28
1980 - 30
1981 - 34
1982 - 28
1983 - 31
1984 - 31
1985 - 36
1986 - 28
1987 - 35
1988 - 35
1989 - 28
1990 - 42
1991 - 25
1992 - 31
1993 - 27
1994 - 31
1995 - 30
1996 - 19
1997 - 19
1998 - 17
1999 - 27
2000 - 21
2001 - 16
2002 - 14
2003 - 30
2004 - 26
2005 - 42
2006 - 39
2007 - 55
2008 - 58
2009 - 59
2010 - 58
2011 - 58
2012 - 58
2013 - 39
2014 - 58
2015 - 61
2016 - 22
2017 - 39
2018 - 56
2019 - 55

 

[Lew II]

..

 

[Lew II]

Since 2007 the Big3 brought the top5 to a different level.

 

[Towny]

This really says nothing more than which years had the Big 3 in the top 5. Not what their form was. Nadal was number 5 in 2015. Didn't play like an ATG though.

Incidentally, this system has 2016, the year Djokovic won the career slam, as one of the very worst

 

[Dan Lobb]

1973 - 19
1974 - 41
1975 - 27
1976 - 22
1977 - 24
1978 - 31
1979 - 28
1980 - 30
1981 - 34
1982 - 28
1983 - 31
1984 - 31
1985 - 36
1986 - 28
1987 - 35
1988 - 35
1989 - 28
1990 - 42
1991 - 25
1992 - 31
1993 - 27
1994 - 31
1995 - 30
1996 - 19
1997 - 19
1998 - 17
1999 - 27
2000 - 21
2001 - 16
2002 - 14
2003 - 30
2004 - 26
2005 - 42
2006 - 39
2007 - 55
2008 - 58
2009 - 59
2010 - 58
2011 - 58
2012 - 58
2013 - 39
2014 - 58
2015 - 61
2016 - 22
2017 - 39
2018 - 56
2019 - 55

1959 - 63, the top number ever

 

[clout]

A more "accurate" list would be how many career majors the players in the top 5 had by the end of the year, not how many they'd go onto have.

 

[Deleted member 763691]

delete

 

[MichaelNadal]

This really says nothing more than which years had the Big 3 in the top 5. Not what their form was. Nadal was number 5 in 2015. Didn't play like an ATG though.

Incidentally, this system has 2016, the year Djokovic won the career slam, as one of the very worst

Bc it was lol. Federer and Nadal were napping and the next gen was yet to actually wake up.

 

[Third Serve]

Bc it was lol. Federer and Nadal were napping and the next gen was yet to actually wake up.

Tbh, the next gen still hasn't woken up yet.

 

[MichaelNadal]

Tbh, the next gen still hasn't woken up yet.

Okeh

 

[Third Serve]

Okeh

As a whole. Various members of the next gen have woken up, only to go back to sleep later on. But as a whole, the next gen is yet to make its breakthrough.

 

[MichaelNadal]

As a whole. Various members of the next gen have woken up, only to go back to sleep later on. But as a whole, the next gen is yet to make its breakthrough.

They may not have won a slam yet but the door has plenty of holes in it, and they had a lot to do with Nadal finishing the season #1, he's the only one really holding them off

 

[Third Serve]

They may not have won a slam yet but the door has plenty of holes in it, and they had a lot to do with Nadal finishing the season #1, he's the only one really holding them off

We are getting closer, I agree.

 

[MichaelNadal]

We are getting closer, I agree.

We were a dropshot away from Medvedev winning the US Open lol, Tsitsipas knocked Fed out of the AO (and won the WTF like Zverev last year), Thiem knocking Novak out of RG again etc, next year I'd be shocked if Djokodal win all 4 slams.

 

[Sabrina]

We are getting closer, I agree.

Big 3 will eventually lose to them at the GS, sooner or later.

 

[Dan Lobb]

Big 3 will eventually lose to them at the GS, sooner or later.

When they reach 60 years old. The Three Grandfathers.

 

[Lew II]

This really says nothing more than which years had the Big 3 in the top 5. Not what their form was. Nadal was number 5 in 2015. Didn't play like an ATG though.

Incidentally, this system has 2016, the year Djokovic won the career slam, as one of the very worst

When Djokovic completed the NCYGS the top5 was still the same as 2015, which was the greatest ever.

 

[Robert Baratheon]

LMAOOO what utter Stupidity.
So if you are judging the level of play of the YE top-5 in that particular year with the number of slems they won-- which in itself is stupid-- atleast do it with the no. of slems they had till those years lol.

With 2015 you are going like 20+19+16+3+3 while in 2015 it was 17+14+12+3+3 so atleast do your wrong stat the right way stupid.
But I can see where you had the problem, if you had gone the right way 2015 would have had 49 while 2019 would have had 20+19+16 i.e. 55 lmao.

 

[KINGROGER]

When Djokovic completed the NCYGS the top5 was still the same as 2015, which was the greatest ever.

- old Fed with no ground game (I like 2017/2019 summer version)
- post back surgery Murray (pigeon)
- worst nadal since 2003
- journeyman wawrinka

some top 5 1 peak ATG with 0 rivals on his level. Wawrinka saved 2015 from being a farce

 

[Lew II]

- old Fed with no ground game (I like 2017/2019 summer version)
- post back surgery Murray (pigeon)
- worst nadal since 2003
- journeyman wawrinka

some top 5 1 peak ATG with 0 rivals on his level. Wawrinka saved 2015 from being a farce

I see only opinions.

Facts say those top5 won the most slams ever.

 

[KINGROGER]

I see only opinions.

Facts say those top5 won the most slams ever.

Fact: none of these guys challenged or posed a problem for Djokovic apart from Wawrinka.

 

[Lew II]

Fact: none of these guys challenged or posed a problem for Djokovic apart from Wawrinka.

Cuz Nole was too good.

Another fact: most ATP points ever

 

[KINGROGER]

Cuz Nole was too good.

Another fact: most ATP points ever

Mediocre opponents.
Yeah, weak year hence why the worst version of Nadal made top 5.