Comparing Federer, Djokovic, and Nadal - 11 Slams - 5 Setters and Sets Lost

[McEnroeisanartist]

How do Sampras, Federer, Djokovic, and Nadal compare in winning their first 11 Slams in terms of 5 Setters and sets lost

Sets Lost
Federer - 23
Nadal - 27
Djokovic - 37
Sampras - 40

5 Set Matches
Federer - 3
Nadal - 6
Djokovic - 9
Sampras - 9

Grand Slams won where a 5th set was played during the Grand Slam
Federer - 3
Nadal - 4
Djokovic - 7
Sampras - 8

 

[zeekhoe]

obviously shows that fedal racked up titles during a seriously weak era.

 

[tennisaddict]

obviously shows that fedal racked up titles during a seriously weak era.

You are hilarious.

 

[Lord Anomander]

So, Sampras had never lost a set?

 

[junior74]

Who had most MTOs?

 

[powerangle]

So...Fed was the most efficient while Djokovic and Sampras were the most battle-hardy/tested?

 

[McEnroeisanartist]

efficient or dominant?

 

[Fedeonic]

So, Sampras had never lost a set?

For 11 majors won, you play 77 matches. I can tell you Pete won the final vs Agassi of his 1st USO in straight sets.

 

[SonnyT]

How many of the 15 were slam winners themselves? How many were ATG's?