Do you think Djokovic's 2011-2016 will be as productive as Federer's 2003-2008

McEnroeisanartist

Hall of Fame
From 2003-2008:
Federer went 459-56 (89.12%).
Federer won 13 Grand Slams
Federer reached 17 Grand Slam Finals
Federer won 53 titles
Federer reached 68 finals

For Djokovic to be as productive, he would have to do the following in 2016:
currently 374-41 (90.12%) - I think he won't get near 459 match wins, but will have higher win/loss %
Win 3 more Grand Slams
Reach 1 more Grand Slam Final
Win 10 more titles
Reach 12 more finals
 
Last edited:

Qubax

Professional
From 2003-2008:
Federer went 459-56 (90.89%).
Federer won 13 Grand Slams
Federer reached 17 Grand Slam Finals
Federer won 53 titles
Federer reached 68 finals

For Djokovic to be as productive, he would have to do the following in 2016:
currently 374-41 (90.12%) - I think he won't get near 459 match wins, but will have higher win/loss %
Win 2 more Grand Slams
Reach 2 more Grand Slam Finals
Win 10 more titles
Reach 12 more finals
The scary thing for Fed fans like I am is that Novak will probably be able to have a 2015-2020 that is better then his own 2011-16. Too many years in between with 1 slam.

If Novak wins 4 this year and 2-3 slams next year he's probably better off using 2015,16,17 as the basis for his peak domination.

And if I am right about this, then Djokovic will end up holding virtually every record.
 
V

VexlanderPrime

Guest
The scary thing for Fed fans like I am is that Novak will probably be able to have a 2015-2020 that is better then his own 2011-16. Too many years in between with 1 slam.

If Novak wins 4 this year and 2-3 slams next year he's probably better off using 2015,16,17 as the basis for his peak domination.

And if I am right about this, then Djokovic will end up holding virtually every record.

This is wildly unlikely tho. Competition will improve and Djoker will regress during 17-20.
 
E

Emperor of Belgrade

Guest
Since we are now comparing the current period with that amazing dominance of Federer in the past, at least it is slowly being accepted that since 2011 it has been a Djokovic era. :)
 
V

VexlanderPrime

Guest
Where exactly is this improved competition coming from? Raonic and Thiem? lol.

Either of those 2 could beat Djoker in slams as early as 2016 or 17. By 2018-20 it will only get harder and harder for him to stay on top.
 

xFedal

Legend
From 2003-2008:
Federer went 459-56 (90.89%).
Federer won 13 Grand Slams
Federer reached 17 Grand Slam Finals
Federer won 53 titles
Federer reached 68 finals

For Djokovic to be as productive, he would have to do the following in 2016:
currently 374-41 (90.12%) - I think he won't get near 459 match wins, but will have higher win/loss %
Win 2 more Grand Slams
Reach 2 more Grand Slam Finals
Win 10 more titles
Reach 12 more finals
Wrong calculation - 1) 459+56 = 515 2) 459/515=89.12% (2dp)
 

xFedal

Legend
The scary thing for Fed fans like I am is that Novak will probably be able to have a 2015-2020 that is better then his own 2011-16. Too many years in between with 1 slam.

If Novak wins 4 this year and 2-3 slams next year he's probably better off using 2015,16,17 as the basis for his peak domination.

And if I am right about this, then Djokovic will end up holding virtually every record.
With seasons like 2011-12 reserved for backup.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
The comparisons should be between 04-07 and whatever. I understand why you would want to dilute that, however.
 
Top