Dunlop F3.0 Tour VS Bio 200 Plus and 200 Max G

[royfrombigd]

Sorry if this has been written about before, but TWs crazy search engine make it impossible (for me anyway) to search F3.0. Anywho, I have been very impressed with Dunlop's 400T, but the glaring weakness for me is on volleys which is normally one of my strengths. I tried the 200 Plus since it was in the same weight range and same head size and I figured the 18x20 SP would improve volleys. That just didn't pan out. I'm curoius if anyone can compare these racquets to the newer F3.0 Tour since it is similar weight and headsize (smaller at 98") to see if I would benefit from it at net. I had a brief foray with the 200G, but am considering revisiting it as well. Appreciate any input. Thanks.

 

[EdFed]

I've hit with the F3.0 Tour extensively and the 200G a few times. I like the feel of the F3 much better, volleys included. The response is crisper and more predictable, and I find the F3 to be more maneuverable. I've demo'd a ton of rackets this year -- the F3 can hold its own with any of them at net. I think it's a great all-around stick, and I say this as someone who traditionally hasn't cared for Dunlop rackets. I'm probably going to buy a few.

Sorry, don't have any experience with the new Bio 200s or 400s.

 

[EdFed]

Should also add that I've hit the Bio 300 Tour and like the F3 much, much better. Much improved feel and stability in my opinion.