Nope,
world cup football ( called soccer, the real football) is the most watched sport event, and the biggest party, in the world. There is no argument about that.
Did the Euro plebs bombard you with perspective? SorryEuro insecurity en masse!
Did the Euro plebs bombard you with perspective? Sorry
I always imagine your posts in a shrill, irate voice.
Euro insecurity en masse!
Did the Euro plebs bombard you with perspective? Sorry
I always imagine your posts in a shrill, irate voice.
If insecure Euros would like to hold on to the boring sport of soccer to reminisce about vestiges of long lost hegemony; more power to you...
You all certainly need something!
So DRII, what about Super Bowl viewership? Did you look it up?
i did and the rest of you are still a insecure bankrupt euro and NFL just matches better with nachos!!!
i win!!!
nachos, really?
shows how little you know...
Humor requires some inherent knowledge of what you're joking!
Here are your beloved links:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/us-superbowl-tv-idUSTRE8151Q020120206
Which says that the Superbowl average audience was 111.3 million viewers.
http://articles.economictimes.india...442_1_peak-rating-highest-rating-star-cricket
About the 135 million figure in India alone in Cricket World Cup final.
http://www1.uefa.com/MultimediaFile...ns/MediaServices/73/54/33/735433_DOWNLOAD.pdf
About the Euro 2008 viewing figures of 155 million viewers per each live match.
There are differing accounts, just as there are for the World Cup and Euro soccer league matches.
But the consensus is that the Super Bowl is the most watched 'single' sporting event. While the World Cup or the Olympics have more viewers over a longer period...
so you know the habbits of every american family in Superbowl day!!!...
dude... resume williams sisters talking as it is clear to be your home soil (turf, hood... whatever)
DRII, stop embarrassing yourself and perpetuating the ignorant and insular American stereotype. And please state the source of your 'consensus' if you want your point to hold any water.
Great,
true to form, you revert back to racism and generalizing.
Again, if the shoe fits...
Again, there are differring figures (which I'm sure you're aware of if you researched it)!
Try again at using that invention created by ignorant and insular Americans; the internet, and find out for yourself and not cherry pick information!
from all the absurd and stupid things you wrote so far in this thread, that is the dumbest by far!
do you know who Tim Barners-Lee is?
from all the absurd and stupid things you wrote so far in this thread, that is the dumbest by far!
do you know who Tim Barners-Lee is?
Again, there are differring figures (which I'm sure you're aware of if you researched it)!
Great,
true to form, you revert back to racism and generalizing.
Again, if the shoe fits...
You are starting to remind me of Chopin here and some of the other folks who cannot write a post without an ad hominem. 'Racism'. 'insecure'.
These are meant to silence dissent. It isn't working.
Try again at using that invention created by ignorant and insular Americans; the internet, and find out for yourself and not cherry pick information!
Haha Sureshs (I did vote for Gore in 2000),
I said where and by whom the internet was created. I did not mention www or html or any of the resulting innovations from the foundation laid down in the U.S.
Whats ultimately worth more, if one had to choose; ink and paper or words and stories?
HTML was not an innovation based on the foundation of the Internet. It was an independent effort which just happened to match the requirements of the Internet at the time.
I completely disagree...
So I guess the P.C. was an independent effort that 'just happened' to match the requirements of microprocessors...
Or the steering wheel to car; or cable programming to the television set...
Kinda naive.
No, you are just extrapolating. Some things are cause and effect, some things are coincidental. If you are saying there is a common cause, yes. It was networking.
The CERN work was to find a way to store data on a server, yet uniformly present and deliver it over the network to someone with a computer. Before that, people had to copy files over manually.
The Internet was a DARPA project to create a network with many different paths between nodes which could operate in the event of a nuclear attack so that key command posts across the country could communicate over some available path.
There are differing accounts, just as there are for the World Cup and Euro soccer league matches.
But the consensus is that the Super Bowl is the most watched 'single' sporting event. While the World Cup or the Olympics have more viewers over a longer period...
Yes, and that Darpa project was the first operable wide spread network, hence the begginning of modern networking.
HTML was a proposal for an 'internet' based hypertext method. If there were no internet, there would be no need for such an innovation...
Yes, and that Darpa project was the first operable wide spread network, hence the begginning of modern networking.
HTML was a proposal for an 'internet' based hypertext method. If there were no internet, there would be no need for such an innovation...
I bet your typing from your Iphone or Ipad
Are there honestly still some people who don't realize that football (or soccer if you wish) is the most popular sport in the world? Talk about being ignorant.
Honestly I'm as far as being a football fan as humanly possible(I'd rather watch a paint dry than a football match) but that's just common knowledge.
I'm sorry, but what? I was reading your ridiculous argument (and I am neither a fan of football or American football) but to argue that American football is even nearly as popular as federeration football is laughable (and I'm American). I can't stand football for the simple reason that players play for a minisule amount of time while taking the maximum of amount of time allotted to set-up for their next play.
But, anyway, to the quoted statement, this is precisely the reason I can't stand Apple's products. Their fans think nothing existed before the iPhone or iPad and that nothing is better. I'm vehemently rooting for Research in Motion's BlackBerry (a Canadian company) to comeback and knock Apple off its vastly inflated position of an "innovator" (all their releases these days are the same, incrementally improved hardware with simply a bit more polished app catalog than Google's).
I'm so tired of superior devices being knocked for not being an "i" in front of their name (Apple made it okay for devices not to support Flash even though most other tablets market support it, and even though they cheer "HTML5", Safari doesn't even come close to the kind of support Chrome or BlackBerry Tablet browsers offer for HTML5).
First off, I never said Football was more 'popular' than futbol.
Call me when Rugby or any 'Euro-only' or Euro-centric sport produces near the revenue or audience of FOOTBALL or the Super Bowl year over year!
First off, I never said Football was more 'popular' than futbol.
Well Mustard is bullsh!tting (and so are you).Europeans don't have anything against American football, they just think it's a crappy sport, a inferior version of Rugby as Mustard said.
You remind me of President Obama (fyi, didn't vote for McCain or Obama so not being political here). When Obama says "as I have always said" that means "I have never said this once until now and hope you won't notice that I never said it".
You just said "I never said" by which you mean "I have been saying this constantly, but now that I have been proven wrong I hope you will think I never have said this before".
I assume you must be rather young.
You seem quite naive but have potential...
Excellent ad hominem, once again.
Now that you have lost the argument, you are attempting to change the subject by discrediting those who have proven you wrong.
Ummm. Italy has a long, long association with Rugby. They're quite good at it too.Well Mustard is bullsh!tting (and so are you).
Europe has no American Football tradition but guess what, is has NO rugby tradition either!
Southern France and the British Isles are the only exceptions.
.
The tournaments were increasing money, and the fab four said the majority of the increase should go the prize money for the lower rounds.
So they're all getting paid more, but its just that the tendency for the prize money to be increased mainly at the finals level is being slightly reversed.