Three tournaments in one weekend is a terrible idea. Splitting your viewership into 3 won't help. You already struggle for an audience with most of the tournaments.
And how would that work with TV? Especially if events are in different time zones?Three tournaments in one weekend is a terrible idea. Splitting your viewership into 3 won't help. You already struggle for an audience with most of the tournaments.
I really hope they get into a pissing match over this!
I really hope they get into a pissing match over this!
like on a 30 kill streak in call of duty modern wafare 2019 hahahaThere were multiple but they got nuked
In 2002 the ATP wanted to merge with the WTA because of the strength of the Williams sisters. Right now there’s more promising WTA players than on the ATP side. The ATP will be in a world of hurt when Fed, Nadal and Djokovic retire.
Wow, Navratilova seems to be still living in the pre-open era.
It's not just about Serena. The likes of Osaka, Gauff and company already have more star power than say, Zverev, Tsitsipas and Medvedev (and I say this as a fan of those guys). And at the end of the day, big figures are the ones that fill stadiums and raise the viewers. The ATP will need some of those once the big four are gone. It's a win/win for both the ATP and the WTA.They could capitalize on the brand from some of the major female players. Serena will bring in more TV viewers and broadcast money than anyone outside the top few ATP pros.
So how does this benefit the ATP?
Federer showing visionary political leadership in these trying times
Funny how many posters here are against this while players who knows the organisations inside out think it’s a good idea.
Listen to the people that knows what they are talking about!
interesting piece about the atp wanting to join the wta i think in the early 2000s back when teh atp was a bit more unpredictable and i guess less marketable before federer took over, for those ppl who doubted that wta was once seen as a more powerful product
Yeah esp once fedal go i assume it will be like that transitional period and as someone else mentioned there are some rising stara on the wta.In 2002 the ATP wanted to merge with the WTA because of the strength of the Williams sisters. Right now there’s more promising WTA players than on the ATP side. The ATP will be in a world of hurt when Fed, Nadal and Djokovic retire.
It's not just about Serena. The likes of Osaka, Gauff and company already have more star power than say, Zverev, Tsitsipas and Medvedev (and I say this as a fan of those guys). And at the end of the day, big figures are the ones that fill stadiums and raise the viewers. The ATP will need some of those once the big four are gone. It's a win/win for both the ATP and the WTA.
Maybe maybe not. We don’t know that.By the time Fedalovic retire WTA might bring more revenues. Economically under 25 players such as Naomi Osaka + Andreescu + Barty + Kenin (Her stardom is halted by Covid unfortunately) are way more lucrative than Zverev, Tsitsipas, Shapo, FAA etc etc.
I don’t really care what fans think, cause this is about the players, not us. Who am I to tell how they should organise them self. It’s not really my field since I’m not and never been a pro player. But I like they thought of them being united as it seems to work well in other sports, better use of resources.You know what kind of person is upset with what Federer is saying, and as always their resistance / rage is not based on any rational thought. Moreover, it might make the men's side look bad, as they do not have as many active majors winners (in other words, more talent capable of winning majors). But it will be interesting to see the worst of Federer's fans--who also grip their resistence/rage politics actually criticize him....
Nobody is talking about women competing against men (outside of mixed doubles).If he is talking about Women players facing Male players at say, USO for example, we will see the utter obliteration of female tennis. They will all go out of the top 100, and they will most likely lose most matches. I’m not saying female tour players are bad, but against male tour players they are not as strong as the majority. I think things should stay the way they’ve been.
Ok, then I kinda get what Fed is talking about.Nobody is talking about women competing against men (outside of mixed doubles).
There will obviously be big issues around separate or combined tours and especially around prize money. What I would like to see are two separate tours but with a set of elite masters/premier joint events. Take the current joint events plus the best from the ATP/WTA to round out a full calendar of joint events. The rest of the events would be separate. Prize money would be equal for the joint events the rest would be based on the revenue generated. They can re-evaluate prize money each year. Maybe with a combined tour that has one brand and one marketing/sales team behind it the disparity between men’s and women’s won’t be that great. And maybe one day they‘ll end up making prize money equal across all events. So long as the men aren’t earning less to prop up the women who cares if the prize money is equal? And honestly once Fed, Nadal and Djokovic leave who knows what the men’s tour will generate. At least on the women’s side there are a number of younger stars in the making. Who’s exciting on the men’s side?Ok, then I kinda get what Fed is talking about.
John McEnroe has talked about tennis needing a so-called commissioner for a long time now....
Ooh Federer made some people salty today.
The fact so many players responded to his tweet makes me think this wasn’t just random musing by Fed. He tweets something and it gets a ton of attention.
You really think it would be economical for slams to have separate events? And how would that even work schedule wise? By the time Wimbledon is over the grass is so beat up. How long would it take to lay new grass and get the venue ready for another slam? I guarantee you TV prefers joint events. In the US there’s very few, if any, non joint events that ESPN shows.I'd have to disagree with Fed on this. I actually want men and women's tours to be separated altogether. Even slams. Organizers will benefit from extra ticket sales and also visitors creating more jobs for longer for their local businesses. Men and women's tennis can then take whatever their generated revenue each and distribute that to players. No more BS on male/female equality whatsoever, they each make their own revenue and take it. Best and fairest way.
If this will create more joint events I'd rather it never happen.
Nadal'e English has improved drastically
Prize money has never been based on the number of sets played. Federer beating someone 1 and 1 in less than an hour gets paid the same as some lower ranked player winning a 3 set 2.5 hour battle. I’m not on board with equal pay for some BS PC equality reason. But if that’s the major road block to combining then make pay equal so long as the men aren’t taking a pay cut to achieve it. What players should be more concerned about is greater revenue sharing with the slams and early rounds of tournaments offer more prize money than they do now (even is that means later rounds get less). If more combined events brings in more revenue and sponsorship $$ then I’m all for it. Guys who hate women’s tennis will just have to get over it.Won't this change many things in the sport?
Women have their own tournaments secured in established cities that some ATP 500s are not.
Logistics may have to change dramatically for either men or women.
Some long-time people in high positions might be relived of their duties with consolidation.
Does this mean the men will still play best of 5 in slams under one organization. If yes, that hardly makes sense for the same prize money.
Is this Fed's secret way of making that equal too?
Most of the joint events are Masters events on the ATP side. Some of the smaller events have a handful of people in the stands whereas places like IW, Miami, Cincy are usually packed.Have a look at the quality of the joint events on tour, and compare them with the events that are a single gender.
The co-gender events are generally much, much better tournaments.
WNBA, Beach Volleyball, Swimming, Track, Bowling, MMA, soccer, marathons, cycling, softball, ALL have equal time periods, quarters, rounds, lengths, distance for women and men. It is not abut PC, it is about consistency.Prize money has never been based on the number of sets played. Federer beating someone 1 and 1 in less than an hour gets paid the same as some lower ranked player winning a 3 set 2.5 hour battle. I’m not on board with equal pay for some BS PC equality reason. But if that’s the major road block to combining then make pay equal so long as the men aren’t taking a pay cut to achieve it. What players should be more concerned about is greater revenue sharing with the slams and early rounds of tournaments offer more prize money than they do now (even is that means later rounds get less). If more combined events brings in more revenue and sponsorship $$ then I’m all for it. Guys who hate women’s tennis will just have to get over it.
Federer probably doesn't know what kind of hot water he is getting into.
He has been overly active on social media and might have been just sharing his opinions not thinking how much people will start looking into it. He probably hasn't thought anything about politics of it and was just thinking aloud.
All men who started off by being loved by Feminists , were thrown off of that pedstal as soon as they showed a slight deviation from feminist principles.
is pam just name dropping venus because she has been influential in teh wta or does venus agree with this? tbh i've been most curious about her thoughts and serena as well but more so venus because she seemed more involved with the tennis politics
Beach Volleyball,