I Don't Get This.....

[Leublu tennis]

I gotted my education in an American high skool...wut are you trying too say?

Delete text.

 

[Leublu tennis]

I gotted my education in an American high skool...wut are you trying too say?

Oh, just noticed your use of the language. Thats cool.

 

[380pistol]

I havent really read any threads related to spewing 'weak era' theory for Capriati actually.You got any?

Oh in the "Former Players" thread, she gets torn apart. He rectum must be 3 times it's normal size now. It's funny when "lucky" and "weak era" are thrown around some people will lose their minds, but not when it comes to Jen-Jen. She was lucky, beat nobodies, passed their prime, no top players, you name it.. and trust me, someone has said it. I'm not her biggest fan, but she gets no love, no respct... nothing.

Agassi, has gotten it bad. It's funny how a lot of people who tell GameSampras "any one who's one 13 slams is not lucky", but yet they claim someone who won 8 was?!? So let me get this straight.... slams 1-8 luck, and 9 and beyond skill.


I won't mention the posters name but said poster sai Agassi winning the 1992 Wimbledon title was "lucky", though he beat Becker and Ivanisevic in doing so. And I asked the same poste then what would he consider Federer first 3 tiles beating Roddick and Hewitt. It ended there, and the Agassi bashing started elsewhere.

 

[380pistol]

I'm still waiting for many who responded to actually address the issue of this thread.

 

[ksbh]

ROFL X 70, Sir 380! Lines like that are a reason I can't skip over your posts, no matter how busy I am!

Anyways, I don't know the answer to the question in your first post, but suffice to say that it doesn't bother me if the Federer fanatics object to my criticism of their hero. I think the man is overrated and I will say it. If you don't believe me, don't ask Rafa, but watch him against Federer!

I won't mention the posters name but said poster sai Agassi winning the 1992 Wimbledon title was "lucky", though he beat Becker and Ivanisevic in doing so. And I asked the same poste then what would he consider Federer first 3 tiles beating Roddick and Hewitt. It ended there, and the Agassi bashing started elsewhere.

 

[380pistol]

what a magical thread. why is it that the usual sampras homers have to hide behind hypothetical arguments in order to make sampras seem somehow relevant.

borg and laver dont need their accomplishments to be embellished. they dont need weak/strong era arguments, they dont need a bunch of equpiment BS. they have cold, hard data backing them.

why is it that sampraz fans have to try so hard to include pete in the discussion? he is a pretty good player. he can stand on his own two feet.

Yes that's correct cuz Serena, Djokovic, Capriati and Agasi are all Sampras. Save your Federphilic and weak era insecurities wil you.

 

[380pistol]

ROFL X 70, Sir 380! Lines like that are a reason I can't skip over your posts, no matter how busy I am!

Anyways, I don't know the answer to the question in your first post, but suffice to say that it doesn't bother me if the Federer fanatics object to my criticism of their hero. I think the man is overrated and I will say it. If you don't believe me, don't ask Rafa, but watch him against Federer!

I can take it step further. recall Agassi's fluke 1999 RG crown, and that pathetic draw. They don't want the list of everyone Roger has beaten the last 4 years to get to Nadal at RG.

Not just this, or him, there are so many hypocrites. I may be an ass, but I'm no hypocrite. And they are the first to chastise someone else for doing so.

 

[ksbh]

Agreed!

Back in 2007, it appeared that Federer was peerless and his GOAT status was all but established. Any mention of Sampras in the same breath as Federer was viewed with utter disdain by the Federer fanatics.

However, after Rafa took over the tennis world, the GOAT discussion has pretty much gone out the window and the attacks on Sampras have reduced dramatically. It seems like the wind is gone from the Federer fans' sails and rightfully so!

I really am enjoying all the Sampras & Nadal threads now! How long can you read about the genius of a man that beat up on the likes of Roddick? LOL!

I can take it step further. recall Agassi's fluke 1999 RG crown, and that pathetic draw. They don't want the list of everyone Roger has beaten the last 4 years to get to Nadal at RG.

Not just this, or him, there are so many hypocrites. I may be an ass, but I'm no hypocrite. And they are the first to chastise someone else for doing so.

 

[OJ ROD]

I don't get why if posters don't like Federer it's sacreligous, and all this "I'm a fan of everyone", or "respect for other players even if you're not a fan of them" nonsense flies around, yet......

I never hear these same sentiments when posters disdain for Djokovic and Serena are thrown around. Why is that???

I'm a Sampras fan, and personally I love it when people dispise him.

Because they have no honor or any real consideration for anyone but themselves. It's oozing out of them in the form of arrogance and that's why most people don't like them.

Not to say that their peers or predecessors are humble beings but, not all of them use arrogance as their main source of fuel.