If Wawrinka wins a 4th slam before Murray

[deacsyoga]

Will tennis commentators and the ilk continue to refer to a "big 4" including Murray but excluding Wawrinka. Since while I think Murray would probably still have accomplished more than Wawrinka overall even at that point, it would be funny to hear them refer to a big 4 of three double digit slam winning GOATs, a 3 slam winner, and excluding a 4 slam winner.

I personally dont even consider there as a big 4. I think there is a big 3 and a big 5 (the latter including both Murray and Wawrinka) and that is it.

 

[BlueClayGOAT]

There's a Big 3. Then there's a big gap. Then there's Murray. Then there's a bigger gap. Then there's Stan.

 

[r2473]

It's the Big 4 because they beat everyone else basically every time. Against each other, Murray is the odd man out.

Stan went on 3 big runs. For some reason, he seems to play his best tennis against Djokovic. But he can lose to anyone at anytime (and pretty much does).