On a relatively basis, if you call Lendl, Edberg, Becker, Agassi, Sampras an "A" career, then Goran, Y-man, Krajicek, Chang, Muster, Guga, Rafter an "A-"career, who would be rather be to if you're gonna have a 'B+" career.
Bascially, I'm asking whether you would have slam and relatively nothing else, or no slam but consistent over a decade or so.
Bascially, I'm asking whether you would have slam and relatively nothing else, or no slam but consistent over a decade or so.