Junior Twist Serve

Worked with my son for a year or so trying to develop the twist serve alignments according various articles and this forum: Toss, grip, back arch, extreme racket drop, shoulder turn, 8-2 path, staying sideways. Does anyone see any room for improvement?

 

BlueB

Legend
The video is too short, we don't see if it twisted after the bounce.
However, the technique is looking nice.

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
His front foot lands behind the baseline, which means he’s not getting any forward thrust into the court. As a result he’s leaving a lot of explosiveness and heaviness on the table. His twist serve will be much more difficult for opponents to deal with if it bounces higher and deeper and hits high in the back fence. Watch Edberg as a reference - he lands with front foot 3 feet inside court even though he doesn’t jump very high.
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
His front foot lands behind the baseline, which means he’s not getting any forward thrust into the court. As a result he’s leaving a lot of explosiveness and heaviness on the table. His twist serve will be much more difficult for opponents to deal with if it bounces higher and deeper and hits high in the back fence. Watch Edberg as a reference - he lands with front foot 3 feet inside court even though he doesn’t jump very high.
I should add that I think your son has already got the complicated part of a good twist serve figured out, as his upper body is almost textbook. Now he just has to start tossing the ball further into the court, lean the left hip out in front of his legs as he crouches to get the body weight in front of his base, then launch forward and upward into the ball. Once he finds the right slot for his toss location to do that, his serve will be a monster.
 

Dragy

Legend
back arch
Beware of this. Your son is young ang flexible and he actually bends his back a lot, but that is neither required nor good for future health. The goal is to get altered swingpath due to torso/shoulder orientation, which is healthily achieved by spine/torso tilt and rotation away from the target. "Limbo" position by pushing hip forward, bending knees, getting on toes. Back arc barely gives an advantage and puts that poor back under huge stress.
 
Beware of this. Your son is young ang flexible and he actually bends his back a lot, but that is neither required nor good for future health. The goal is to get altered swingpath due to torso/shoulder orientation, which is healthily achieved by spine/torso tilt and rotation away from the target. "Limbo" position by pushing hip forward, bending knees, getting on toes. Back arc barely gives an advantage and puts that poor back under huge stress.

We've used this as a reference: https://tennisplayer.net/public/cla.../keys_to_the_kick/keys_to_the_kick_page2.html
 

Dragy

Legend
Well that's expected to be a reputable source. Still I don't see best pros going with such pronounced back arc, even when serving evidently twisting serves. And multiple sources warned against overdoing back arc. It's up to you to continue observing examples and decide where to move.

Add: I'm also not found of his "buttscratch" demonstration - he seems to overbend the elbow, and dropping the racquet head deeper, to the butt, is still not the "scratching the back of a nearby person" which is observed for better mechanics. So taking this into account, author is at least not 100% credible, which makes me further question his ideas :-D
 
Well that's expected to be a reputable source. Still I don't see best pros going with such pronounced back arc, even when serving evidently twisting serves. And multiple sources warned against overdoing back arc. It's up to you to continue observing examples and decide where to move.

Add: I'm also not found of his "buttscratch" demonstration - he seems to overbend the elbow, and dropping the racquet head deeper, to the butt, is still not the "scratching the back of a nearby person" which is observed for better mechanics. So taking this into account, author is at least not 100% credible, which makes me further question his ideas :-D

Duly noted; FYI the guys name is Chris Lewit, and he seems to hold himself out as an expert on the twist, so much so he wrote an article. I will monitor my son's back health. I'm not sure how much data there is out there on juniors' back problems from arching like this. I do know that I tried to achieve these alignments myself and I am physically incapable of coming close to the ideal twist serve conditions. It does not fell right tilting and turning, much less arching. I can, however, hit a hard slice and a flat serve as well as a 55 mph topspin serve, lol.

We are actually discovering that the twist effect is really dependent on the face angle at impact. Minor fluctuations and variations have him shooting blanks on the twist spin.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
The book Technical Tennis indicates that the area of the ball that the racket strings contact for a kick serve is on the top half of the ball. That means that the racket has to be tilted closed, considerably more closed (15 d) than for a flat or slice serve (few degrees +/-). The actural racket contact of the ball is difficult to see but the forward tilt of the racket shaft can be seen. The angle of the racket face and shaft of a kick serve just before impact might be around 15 d closed. It is not easy to video this shaft angle, the camera has to be looking mostly from the side of the ball's trajectory. I've posted the way to set up the camera.

I have not found much information on this subject, just the discussion and ball picture in Technical Tennis, a few kick serve videos (unconfirmed) where the forward tilt of the racket was caught on video.

Did you observe this forward tilt of the racket face just before impact?

An easier observation is that the racket strings must also rise above the ball after impact while for the slice and flat serves this is not seen nearly as much. Note clear high speed video of the racket head has to be used to see this. 240 fps shows the racket rise to its peak height one frame after impact for a kick serve. The time between frames at 240 fps is 4.2 milliseconds. To see this racket rise, place the camera high and looking along the ball's trajectory.

If you get a top spin high bounce but not the jump to the right the racket might not have the forward tilt just before impact.
 
Last edited:
The book Technical Tennis indicates that the area of the ball that the racket strings contact for a kick serve is on the top half of the ball. That means that the racket has to be tilted closed, considerably more closed (15 d) than for a flat or slice serve (few degrees +/-). The actural racket contact of the ball is difficult to see but the forward tilt of the racket shaft can be seen. The angle of the racket face and shaft of a kick serve just before impact might be around 15 d closed. It is not easy to video this shaft angle, the camera has to be looking mostly from the side of the ball's trajectory. I've posted the way to set up the camera.

I have not found much information on this subject, just the discussion and ball picture in Technical Tennis, a few kick serve videos (unconfirmed) where the forward tilt of the racket was caught on video.

Did you observe this forward tilt of the racket face just before impact?

An easier observation is that the racket strings must also rise above the ball after impact while for the slice and flat serves this is not seen nearly as much. Note clear high speed video of the racket head has to be used to see this. 240 fps shows the racket rise to its peak height one frame after impact for a kick serve. The time between frames at 240 fps is 4.2 milliseconds. To see this racket rise, place the camera high and looking along the ball's trajectory.

If you get a top spin high bounce but not the jump to the right the racket might not have the forward tilt just before impact.

I have a topspin serve of his from the receivers vantage point here and you can clearly see the racket rising after impact but it’s so quick you might have to use a desktop and hit the comma and period Keys to go frame by frame

 

Kevo

Legend
I think it's really quite good. For me I always start from the toss. In this case I would say the toss is too far behind his head personally. That's one thing that arching the back will do is allow a farther behind toss, but I don't like it so far back because it encourages the bending of the back more than might be necessary and it's also a real giveaway for a lot of servers. That type of toss almost always means the spin out wide. It will give a good returner plenty of time to camp out for the return.

The other thing I think I notice is that the rotation of the arm is not happening during contact. It looks to me, as best I can tell from that video, that he is using quite a bit of wrist deviation when brushing the strings across the ball. That works up to a point, but in my experience it will limit the max swing speed more so than developing a nice rotational technique during the contact. I've struggled off and on with that myself over the years because I learned it first as the most obvious way to brush across the ball. I still fall back into that at times if I'm not careful. Usually just a basket of balls with some slow and deliberate kick serve practice will straighten it back out. You can swing more aggressively and disguise the direction better with the rotation of the arm during the contact. I think it also gives a little more power as you are rotating into the ball a bit as you brush across it.

I like to call that motion of the hand and arm right at contact the "swingularity". Been using the phrase with my students for a long time now. Next to a perfect toss, the swingularity is the second most important component to an awesome serve in my opinion. That motion was the magic component to the serve that I was never taught and had to learn for myself from reading articles and trying to do the different drills I found in them. I wish that I would have been taught it from the beginning, but I still see coaches all the time having their students drill serves with forehand grips. Drives me nuts. Looks like you are doing quite a good job with your son, so kudos to you. :)
 

CupidsTrick

New User
I think it's really quite good. For me I always start from the toss. In this case I would say the toss is too far behind his head personally. That's one thing that arching the back will do is allow a farther behind toss, but I don't like it so far back because it encourages the bending of the back more than might be necessary and it's also a real giveaway for a lot of servers. That type of toss almost always means the spin out wide. It will give a good returner plenty of time to camp out for the return.

The other thing I think I notice is that the rotation of the arm is not happening during contact. It looks to me, as best I can tell from that video, that he is using quite a bit of wrist deviation when brushing the strings across the ball. That works up to a point, but in my experience it will limit the max swing speed more so than developing a nice rotational technique during the contact. I've struggled off and on with that myself over the years because I learned it first as the most obvious way to brush across the ball. I still fall back into that at times if I'm not careful. Usually just a basket of balls with some slow and deliberate kick serve practice will straighten it back out. You can swing more aggressively and disguise the direction better with the rotation of the arm during the contact. I think it also gives a little more power as you are rotating into the ball a bit as you brush across it.

I like to call that motion of the hand and arm right at contact the "swingularity". Been using the phrase with my students for a long time now. Next to a perfect toss, the swingularity is the second most important component to an awesome serve in my opinion. That motion was the magic component to the serve that I was never taught and had to learn for myself from reading articles and trying to do the different drills I found in them. I wish that I would have been taught it from the beginning, but I still see coaches all the time having their students drill serves with forehand grips. Drives me nuts. Looks like you are doing quite a good job with your son, so kudos to you. :)

@Kevo Are you talking about pronating during contact (using the whole upper arm) instead of using mostly the power of your wrist to brush up?
 

Kevo

Legend
@CupidsTrick, yes. If you don't rotate the arm then you end up using the bending (deviation) of the wrist to decelerate the frame. That typically ends up forcing a limit on racquet speed to protect the wrist.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
I have a topspin serve of his from the receivers vantage point here and you can clearly see the racket rising after impact but it’s so quick you might have to use a desktop and hit the comma and period Keys to go frame by frame


I have video information on the kick serve but none on the 'twist' serve.

I see the racket rising in the three frames before, during and after impact.

Your receiver's view camera arrangement can show the bounce to the side for the kick serve. If a kick serve, for the receiver, the bounce appears to the left and for the server, the bounce appears to the right. The direction of the bounce shows up best if the camera is aligned with the trajectory at the bounce.

Here is impact and the trajectory. The camera is hand held and was moving around during the video clip.
7B1404B298F6457DA6DAC267F6280EB0.jpg


The bounce or closest to the bounce. Because of the moving camera, the location of the ball's trajectory to the court is most accurate in this one picture.
554C622764554502839E7154EBDC9A9D.jpg


Rising ball.
4D1D9B8C940E40F3BEDDE7A7330446BB.jpg


I believe that the ball might have appeared like this and still might have had a slight bounce to the left, but I think it had no left bounce. Repeat, camera looking along the trajectory at bounce to improve accuracy for seeing any bounce to the side. Camera behind server looking along the trajectory will show direction of bounce also. With wide angle lens on a smart phone - ?

The leftward bounce comes about because of the large tilt on the spin axis. See post #11. Buy reference Technical Tennis and look at the location of the racket on the ball. Take a racket and ball and see the tilt on the racket to first contact the top half of the ball.
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/kick-serve-ball-contact-position.570272/page-2

I believe the serve above is a top spin serve and that the racket was not closed at impact. The racket was probably neutral - not closed - at impact. The racket was not tilted forward/closed as for a kick serve at impact.

I have posted on the kick serve and tilt many times.
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...jectory-off-the-racquet.619786/#post-12416289

Do you ever see the ball bounce to the side - to right for the server or to left for the receiver?
 
Last edited:

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
I have video information on the kick serve but none on the 'twist' serve.

I see the racket rising in the three frames before, during and after impact.

Your receiver's view camera arrangement can show the bounce to the side for the kick serve. For the receiver, the bounce appears to the left and for the server, the bounce appears to the right. The direction of the bounce shows up best if the camera is aligned with the trajectory at the bounce.

Here is impact and the trajectory. The camera is hand held and was moving around during the video clip.
7B1404B298F6457DA6DAC267F6280EB0.jpg


The bounce or closest to the bounce. Because of the moving camera, the location of the ball's trajectory to the court is most accurate in this one picture.
554C622764554502839E7154EBDC9A9D.jpg


Rising ball.
4D1D9B8C940E40F3BEDDE7A7330446BB.jpg


I believe that the ball might have appeared like this and still might have had a little bounce to the left, but I think it had no left bounce. Repeat, camera looking along the trajectory at bounce to improve accuracy for seeing any bounce to the side. Camera behind server looking along the trajectory will show direction of bounce also. With wide angle lens on a smart phone - ?

The leftward bounce comes about because of the large tilt on the spin axis. See post #11. Buy reference Technical Tennis and look at the location of the racket on the ball. Take a racket and ball and see the tilt on the racket to first contact the top half of the ball.

I believe the serve above is a top spin serve and that the racket was not closed at impact using that technique. The racket was probably neutral - not closed - at impact. The racket was not tilted forward/closed as for a kick serve at impact.

I have posted on the kick serve and tilt many times.
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...jectory-off-the-racquet.619786/#post-12416289

Do you ever see the ball bounce to the side - to right for the server or to left for the receiver?
The serve above is what most people think of as a ‘topspin’ serve, but the spin axis is actually roughly 60 degrees from horizontal (or 8 to 2 clock angle). A spin axis 10 more degrees toward horizontal (50 degrees from horizontal, or 7:10 to 1:40, as documented in Cross’s article) will produce a twist serve ‘kick’ to right from server’s vantage point, keeping everything else the same. Conversely, adjust spin axis the other direction, toward 8:30 to 2:30 click angle, will produce a bounce in the opposite direction “topspin slice”).
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
The serve above is what most people think of as a ‘topspin’ serve, but the spin axis is actually roughly 60 degrees from horizontal (or 8 to 2 clock angle). A spin axis 10 more degrees toward horizontal (50 degrees from horizontal, or 7:10 to 1:40, as documented in Cross’s article) will produce a twist serve ‘kick’ to right from server’s vantage point, keeping everything else the same. Conversely, adjust spin axis the other direction, toward 8:30 to 2:30 click angle, will produce a bounce in the opposite direction “topspin slice”).

What Cross article is that?

Unfortunately, the names 'side spin' and 'top spin' have tennis usages both to name types of serves and to name vector components of the spin vector. ...........................

All type serves have one spin axis and the orientation of that spin axis can be described in 3D space using 3 components -
1) top spin component - "Y (leftward)" see below on ball diagram
2) side spin component - "Z (upward)"
3) gyrospin (or spiral spin) component - "X (forward)"

See vectors, vector addition, vector components.

These 3 components can have values that vary from 0 or negligible to high values.

Here are some measurements showing spin vectors of each type of serve and their vector components. The length of the spin vector is proportional to the spin rate, in RPM or RPS, and the direction of the spin vector is given by the vector components. Notice that there is similar gyrospin components on the flat, kick and slice serves. Unfortunately, the Top Spin serve was not measured.

99E1500A74BE43998A5E67D4FED5A748.jpg


Top Spin Serve. From Technical Tennis, a 'top spin' serve spin vector has a component of top spin and a component of side spin but not much gyrospin component. The 'top spin' serve spin vector is in a plane mostly perpendicular to the forward direction. A spin vector with components of both side spin and top spin would have an angle to the horizontal, as you mention. You can produce a 'top spin' serve by contacting the back of the ball, racket strings going up and to the side at an angle.

Kick Serve. The kick serve has 3 components to its spin axis, top spin, side spin and gyrospin. The gyrospin component for a kick serve is larger than that for a 'top spin' serve. The racket needs to contact the top half of the ball to get the components of top spin, side spin and gyropsin.

To understand why the kick serve ball bounces to the right so much more than the flat or slice serves, imagine the ball as shown spinning with the axes shown. Imagine the court under the spinning ball and the ball lowering to touch the court....estimate the speed of the ball felt as high or low where touch first occurs.

In addition, the approximate racket string direction to produce those spins would be perpendicular to the spin axes. But real impacts are more complicated with ball and string distortions, the racket head rotating, etc .................
 
Last edited:
Do you ever see the ball bounce to the side - to right for the server or to left for the receiver?

Thanks for illustrating that; I do however want to clarify that the video I posted from the receiver standpoint is merely a topspin serve the first video from the server standpoint is the twist ! It Does illustrate the racket continuing upward after impact .

I return his serve all the time and sometimes it’s topspin and sometimes it’s twist depending on how much racket tilt forward he gets . He gets discouraged because sometimes if he tries to get more forward tilt he hits it in the net. :(
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
Thanks for illustrating that; I do however want to clarify that the video I posted from the receiver standpoint is merely a topspin serve the first video from the server standpoint is the twist ! It Does illustrate the racket continuing upward after impact .

I return his serve all the time and sometimes it’s topspin and sometimes it’s twist depending on how much racket tilt forward he gets . He gets discouraged because sometimes if he tries to get more forward tilt he hits it in the net. :(

I did that work and then re-read your comments on that "top spin" serve video. I saw that after I was done. I left it as it was.

I looked at the OP serve. It might go up a little from impact to the next frame. ? When the racket is going away from a camera the racket is getting farther from the camera and even if goes up it may appear to go down. ?? The racket also has motion blur probably because of the overcast skys.

My approach is to redo the video and make sure whatever you want to see is well displayed. You sound as if you are looking and understand what racket rising should look like. ?

Racket rising.
To do single frame on Vimeo, click Vimeo, full screen, hold down the SHIFT KEY and use the ARROW KEYS.

Videos from behind work well also to show racket rise.

The racket tilt can be videoed and it is easy once you know where the camera should be and your camera can produce a sharp image. 240 fps with small motion blur works.

Notice - To see how closed the racket head is just before impact take a serve video and move the camera so that the edge of the racket closest to the camera blocks the edge farther away, as in the Stosur frame just before impact.

You son's serve is good enough that you will need side-by-side high speed video comparisons from the same camera angles.
 
I did that work and then re-read your comments on that "top spin" serve video. I saw that after I was done. I left it as it was.

I looked at the OP serve. It might go up a little from impact to the next frame. ? When the racket is going away from a camera the racket is getting farther from the camera and even if goes up it may appear to go down. ?? The racket also has motion blur probably because of the overcast skys.

My approach is to redo the video and make sure whatever you want to see is well displayed. You sound as if you are looking and understand what racket rising should look like. ?

Racket rising.
To do single frame on Vimeo, click Vimeo, full screen, hold down the SHIFT KEY and use the ARROW KEYS.

Videos from behind work well also to show racket rise.

The racket tilt can be videoed and it is easy once you know where the camera should be and your camera can produce a sharp image. 240 fps with small motion blur works.

Notice - To see how closed the racket head is just before impact take a serve video and move the camera so that the edge of the racket closest to the camera blocks the edge farther away, as in the Stosur frame just before impact.

You son's serve is good enough that you will need side-by-side high speed video comparisons from the same camera angles.


So how much gyro spin is reasonably achievable ? To show my son the 3 axes I drilled a hole through a tennis ball leaving the ball on the drill bit. Standing across from him If I pointed the drill bit to the sky, and pulled the trigger it’s side spin. If I point the drill bit to his left or right it’s top spin. If I point the drill at him, it’s spiral spin aka gyro spin. He quickly observed he could not hit pure gyro spin. Should I point the drill bit 45° Between topspin and gyro spin and also 45° upward to get a side spin component?
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
So how much gyro spin is reasonably achievable ? To show my son the 3 axes I drilled a hole through a tennis ball leaving the ball on the drill bit. Standing across from him If I pointed the drill bit to the sky, and pulled the trigger it’s side spin. If I point the drill bit to his left or right it’s top spin. If I point the drill at him, it’s spiral spin aka gyro spin. He quickly observed he could not hit pure gyro spin. Should I point the drill bit 45° Between topspin and gyro spin and also 45° upward to get a side spin component?

The top spin component has a horizontal spin axis. The top spin serve serve has a mix of top spin and side spin.

The picture of the ball serve spins shows you how to point the drill for the kick. slice and flat serves. It points in the direction of the spin vector.

When you have the ball spinning at those angles imagine if the ball were lowered on the court. Think of the speed of the felt.

Wear safety glasses. if the ball distorts is may cause the drill to catch somehow.

Cross in his article "Physics of the Kick Serve" says that the original spin that the racket puts on the ball continues until bounce. In other words, the ball acts like a gyroscope. You should feel the gyroscopic forces on the ball in the drill.

You could take a Sharpie and draw arrows on the ball to indicate the rotation speed of the felt.

You and your son should view the Ellenbecker video on shoulder to upper arm orientation for the tennis serve, "Rotator Cuff Injury". The recommended upper arm orientation reduces the risk of impingement. The techniques used by high level players are almost always examples of good practice for upper arm orientation to the shoulder joint. That video is available on Tennis Resources, associated with the USPTA. Join for a 3 month subscription. There are also conditioning exercises and stretches.
 
Last edited:
Yes I see that as between the y & z-axis it looks like the kick axis is 60° between them but as for the x-axis I can’t tell how far forward
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
So how much gyro spin is reasonably achievable ? To show my son the 3 axes I drilled a hole through a tennis ball leaving the ball on the drill bit. Standing across from him If I pointed the drill bit to the sky, and pulled the trigger it’s side spin. If I point the drill bit to his left or right it’s top spin. If I point the drill at him, it’s spiral spin aka gyro spin. He quickly observed he could not hit pure gyro spin. Should I point the drill bit 45° Between topspin and gyro spin and also 45° upward to get a side spin component?
Chas is over-complicating it. Your son is doing just fine finding the right swingpath to make the ball twist. Just work on making tweaks that assist with generating more racquethead speed relative to the ball (more forward leg thrust, deeper racquet drop etc) , and his serve will take off and get better and better.

You can have him play with making slight adjustments to the clock angle of attack, and you will get instant feedback by seeing how it affects the direction of the bounce. The ability to make those slight adjustments while keeping the same toss will keep his opponent guessing which direction the ball will bounce.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
Yes I see that as between the y & z-axis it looks like the kick axis is 60° between them but as for the x-axis I can’t tell how far forward

Look at the dashed lines, they show the gyrospin and other components.

Strange facts from the ball picture:

1) The kick serve spin vector has more of a side spin component than the slice serve.
2) The kick serve spin vector has a larger side spin component than a top spin component!
3) The kick, slice and flat serves all have about the same gyrospin components, percentage wise the kick serve has the least gyrospin. I think that the top spin serve has a small gyrospin spin vector component.
4) For a kick serve, the ball bounces to the right because the felt that first contacts the court propels it that way.
5) That kick serve felt has more speed on the court than the felt of the flat or slice serves because of the tilt of the spin vector. In other words, the radius of first felt contact is farther away from the ball spin axis.

Best that I can determine is the racket at about 15+/- degrees tilted closed. With the proper other racket head motions, path, rotations, angles would give the kick serve.
 
Last edited:
Look at the dashed lines, they show the gyrospin and other components.

Strange facts from the ball picture:

1) The kick serve spin vector has more of a side spin component than the slice serve.
2) The kick serve spin vector has a larger side spin component than a top spin component!
3) The kick, slice and flat serves all have about the same gyrospin components, percentage wise the kick serve has the least gyrospin. I think that the top spin serve has a small gyrospin spin vector component.
4) For a kick serve, the ball bounces to the right because the felt that first contacts the court propels it that way.
5) That kick serve felt has more speed on the court than the felt of the flat or slice serves because of the tilt of the spin vector. In other words, the radius of first felt contact is farther away from the ball spin axis.

Best that I can determine is the racket at about 15+/- degrees tilted closed. With the proper other racket head motions, path, rotations, angles would give the kick serve.


Lol I tried

 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
OK guys how do you like this one:


3890027.jpg


I am having a problem with interpreting this picture. The red bounce could be going to the side and I believe that it is. But is there some way that the picture can fool us? This is the 2D image of 3D space problem that cameras have.

I think that if you view from behind the server trying to get parallel to the ball's trajectory approaching the bounce, that might be the best view to see the side bounce. Forget the ball's drop and align the camera to the azimuth angle.

It looks like an excellent serve.
 
It’s basically a nasty twist serve to the ad court that hit the side fence lol


3890027.jpg


I am having a problem with interpreting this picture. The red bounce could be going to the side and I believe that it is. But is there some way that the picture can fool us? This is the 2D image of 3D space problem that cameras have.

I think that if you view from behind the server trying to get parallel to the ball's trajectory approaching the bounce, that might be the best view to see the side bounce. Forget the ball's drop and align the camera to the azimuth angle.

It looks like an excellent serve.
 

Kevo

Legend
I return his serve all the time and sometimes it’s topspin and sometimes it’s twist depending on how much racket tilt forward he gets . He gets discouraged because sometimes if he tries to get more forward tilt he hits it in the net. :(

The forward tilt of the racquet face shouldn't change much at all between spin serves. The face of the racquet at contact determines the direction the ball travels. One of the benefits of the spin serve is you can aim higher over the net and still hit the ball in due to the extra spin. Aiming down is reducing the margin for error over the net.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
The forward tilt of the racquet face shouldn't change much at all between spin serves. The face of the racquet at contact determines the direction the ball travels. One of the benefits of the spin serve is you can aim higher over the net and still hit the ball in due to the extra spin. Aiming down is reducing the margin for error over the net.

The racket face orientation for a kick serve in my posts is closed because
1) The Rod Cross and Lindsay publication, Technical Tennis, says that the racket should be closed by showing a ball diagram with contact on the top half.
2) I caught a video of Stosur and found that to be the case. I'd like to find several more.
3) Also, found a Federer serve, described as a kick serve, that had the racket face closed.
4) Toly has an old post where he discusses the closed face of the racket. I don't know the source of his information.
5) I looked for the closed face on a player that had a high bouncing serve, I had thought that it was a kick serve, but only about 3 of estimated 70-80 serves bounced to the right. The videos showed the racket with no forward tilt = probably he has a top spin serve.

Those are most of the outside pieces of evidence that lead me to believe that the racket face is closed at impact for a kick serve that bounces to the right.

What evidence do you have?

The racket face is also usually closed just before forehand impacts. The ball forms a pocket in the racket strings and the racket strings are moving up for a top spin forehand drive. When all is said and done, there are complications to impacts that go beyond how the strings face just before impact.

As far as the face of the racket at serve impact goes, the racket face changes orientation during impact from ISR and swinging and the strings distort - the collision is more complicated than the angle of the strings at impact. If the racket is rotating from ISR at 2500 degrees per second or 2.5 degrees per millisecond, in 4 milliseconds of impact the racket face would turn in the azmuthal direction from ISR by 10 degrees. But the collision is more complicated than that.......

The simplification is - Does the racket face have about a 15 d closed tilt for a very good high level kick serve or not? We can solve that with high speed videos and learn something. The OP or others with a strong kick serve and high speed video should simply take videos to catch the tilt of the racket face just before impact. I've provided examples and can give instructions on where to place the cameras.

If this tilt is true and not used, can a server ever hit a kick serve that bounces to the right?
 
Last edited:

Kevo

Legend
@Chas Tennis, I was referring to the statement of @TwistAndShout. He was talking about the ball going into the net with more forward racquet tilt. It was not a statement about tilt or no tilt, just about more tilt. The amount of tilt a person uses with a spin serve is going to vary by individual to some degree, but shouldn't vary much for that same individual, and adding more tilt from one spin serve to the next is likely to do exactly what he observed and send the ball down towards the net.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
@Chas Tennis, I was referring to the statement of @TwistAndShout. He was talking about the ball going into the net with more forward racquet tilt. It was not a statement about tilt or no tilt, just about more tilt. The amount of tilt a person uses with a spin serve is going to vary by individual to some degree, but shouldn't vary much for that same individual, and adding more tilt from one spin serve to the next is likely to do exactly what he observed and send the ball down towards the net.

The forward tilt of the racquet face shouldn't change much at all between spin serves. The face of the racquet at contact determines the direction the ball travels. One of the benefits of the spin serve is you can aim higher over the net and still hit the ball in due to the extra spin. Aiming down is reducing the margin for error over the net.

To me "spin serves" include a slice, kick, top spin but not a flat since it has the least spin. The kick serve is the only one with large, ~15 d., closed racket tilt.

The tilt on the racket face is one factor that determines the ball trajectory's 'projection angle' (up-down) but the path of the racket during impact is another factor. Since the racket path is traveling up during the kick serve impact these two factors give a higher trajectory than if the racket path had less upward racket velocity, similar to a top spin forehand drive with a closed racket face of 5-10 degrees.

It seems as if observations comparing the projection angles of the racket of the kick and top spin serves would be interesting. The top spin serve probably comes off the racket with a higher projection angle than the kick serve due to the racket face tilt. It seems as if the OP and his son might be able to do some very interesting measurements from the side camera view that show racket face tilt just before impact and projection angles. The Top Spin serve without as much racket face tilt should have a higher projection angle off the racket than the kick serve and travel deeper into the service box. ?

Projection Angle - the biomechanical term for the angle of the trajectory above or below the horizontal. Used for more than tennis.
biomechanics-and-sports-7-638.jpg


Rod Cross states that kick serves have projection angles below the horizontal.

He also shows a serve that is slow and higher called a "lob kick serve", too slow for ATP use. A lob kick serve has a projection angle above the horizontal. See Answers to Questions in Physics of the Kick Serve.
Fig13.jpg
 
Last edited:

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
The forward tilt of the racquet face shouldn't change much at all between spin serves. The face of the racquet at contact determines the direction the ball travels. One of the benefits of the spin serve is you can aim higher over the net and still hit the ball in due to the extra spin. Aiming down is reducing the margin for error over the net.

I believe that it was Cross that said a kick serve should land short in the service box to be more effective. I'd like to see some ATP measurements on that, pace, spin, racket face tilt and where the ball lands for high level kick serves.
 
Wouldn’t forward racket tilt naturally come from the fact that the server is sideways on a kick and his head is between his shoulder and the ball ?
 
Last edited:

Kevo

Legend
To me "spin serves" include a slice, kick, top spin but not a flat since it has the least spin. The kick serve is the only one with large, ~15 d., closed racket tilt.

The tilt on the racket face is one factor that determines the ball trajectory's 'projection angle' (up-down) but the path of the racket during impact is another factor. Since the racket path is traveling up during the kick serve impact these two factors give a higher trajectory than if the racket path had less upward racket velocity, similar to a top spin forehand drive with a closed racket face of 5-10 degrees.

I'm not sure what the actual degree of down tilt you can use is, but I doubt it's 15 degrees. Most of the pictures I've seen show the racquet very close to vertical, but I'm sure it varies from player to player based on their height and the amount of spin they generate.

In any case, the angle of the face at contact determines trajectory on the serve. The path is going to determine the spin. Think about hitting dribbling the ball on the racquet while swiping the racquet sideways. You can put a lot of spin on the ball with the side swipe, but the ball keeps going up in the air, not sideways.

The case you mentioned of a topspin forehand drive is a different from a serve in the sense that you also have an incoming velocity and direction associated with the ball. In that case you can have a slightly closed face and still have the ball travel upward since you have an upward trajectory on the incoming ball. The ball is being reflected off the strings. In that situation the face needs to open or close more or less depending on the speed and trajectory of the incoming shot. At slower speeds you can pretty much call that negligible, but at higher speeds and spins you might have to close the face quite a bit to counter the incoming ball. Think about a topspin forehand that will bounce near the baseline and hit the back fence above the crossbar. That shot has a lot of upward energy that will need to be counterbalanced.

Hopefully this makes sense. If you do happen to have any pictures of serves where the racquet face is closed 15 degrees at impact I'd like to see them and find out more. It really doesn't sound likely to me, but maybe it is for a big tall server for a certain type of serve. The context would be important to understand how that would work.
 

Kevo

Legend
Wouldn’t forward racket tilt naturally come from the fact that the server is sideways on a kick and his head is between his shoulder and the ball ?

I think forward tilt is a natural thing for most people for a variety of reasons probably. I'm usually trying to get people to not tilt the racquet forward when they hit spin. I call it covering the ball with the strings. It really limits the potential of the serve IMO. I like to tell people that the racquet needs to clear the ball before it starts to roll over, but it's pretty hard for most people to internalize that. When they cover the ball the serve tends to be short with not as much action on it. It will also cause people to hit into the net at times if they're not careful.
 

Dragy

Legend
I'm not sure what the actual degree of down tilt you can use is, but I doubt it's 15 degrees. Most of the pictures I've seen show the racquet very close to vertical, but I'm sure it varies from player to player based on their height and the amount of spin they generate.

In any case, the angle of the face at contact determines trajectory on the serve. The path is going to determine the spin. Think about hitting dribbling the ball on the racquet while swiping the racquet sideways. You can put a lot of spin on the ball with the side swipe, but the ball keeps going up in the air, not sideways.

The case you mentioned of a topspin forehand drive is a different from a serve in the sense that you also have an incoming velocity and direction associated with the ball. In that case you can have a slightly closed face and still have the ball travel upward since you have an upward trajectory on the incoming ball. The ball is being reflected off the strings. In that situation the face needs to open or close more or less depending on the speed and trajectory of the incoming shot. At slower speeds you can pretty much call that negligible, but at higher speeds and spins you might have to close the face quite a bit to counter the incoming ball. Think about a topspin forehand that will bounce near the baseline and hit the back fence above the crossbar. That shot has a lot of upward energy that will need to be counterbalanced.

Hopefully this makes sense. If you do happen to have any pictures of serves where the racquet face is closed 15 degrees at impact I'd like to see them and find out more. It really doesn't sound likely to me, but maybe it is for a big tall server for a certain type of serve. The context would be important to understand how that would work.
I must step forward to support fellow @Chas Tennis here: there evidently is a “drag effect” of the strings when hitting the ball with angled stringbed. This effect lifts the ball on topspin groundies with vertical/closed racquet face (you can find numerous videos when descending ball is hit in the same manner); this effects allows to hit backspin volleys downward with vertical/slightly open racquet face. And same effect allows serving with tilted (closed) racquet face rising through contact to result in ~horizontal initial ball path.

Meanwhile I also support your idea of combating servers’ tendency to tilt racquet face on many serves, as for most vertical racquet face is the sweet optimum for unrestricted swing, associated power and sufficient spin to shape the flight and reliably land the serve in. The “but” is associated particularly with the twist serve: without tilted RF no gyrospin can be applied and no sideways kick may happen.
 

Kevo

Legend
I must step forward to support fellow @Chas Tennis here: there evidently is a “drag effect” of the strings when hitting the ball with angled stringbed. This effect lifts the ball on topspin groundies with vertical/closed racquet face (you can find numerous videos when descending ball is hit in the same manner); this effects allows to hit backspin volleys downward with vertical/slightly open racquet face. And same effect allows serving with tilted (closed) racquet face rising through contact to result in ~horizontal initial ball path.

I think you're right that there can be a drag effect, but I think it's minimal. There might be a few degrees of freedom, but my thinking is that people who lift the ball with a topspin lob type shot are hitting below center of the back of the ball. When doing the drill I mentioned with the ball dribbling you can have an extreme sideways swipe of the ball and still leave traveling up and down in straight line. If the drag effect was very much the ball would surely travel off to the side. If you don't contact the bottom center with the swipe then you do lose it and will will go quite a ways off to the side.
 

Dragy

Legend
but my thinking is that people who lift the ball with a topspin lob type shot are hitting below center of the back of the ball.
You can only do this with racquet face open a few degrees, right? Also I’m not talking lob type. Just any shot where ball hit at, e.g., belly level and passes the net several feet higher.

We are also pretty familiar with the fact that “launch angle” depends strongly on the stringbed qualities, like spacing, string movement, string slickiness.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
..............................
Hopefully this makes sense. If you do happen to have any pictures of serves where the racquet face is closed 15 degrees at impact I'd like to see them and find out more. It really doesn't sound likely to me, but maybe it is for a big tall server for a certain type of serve. The context would be important to understand how that would work.

See discussion in post #22.
To do single frame on Vimeo hold down the SHIFT KEY and use the ARROW KEYS.

Federer video by Toly that shows the same impact angle.
To do single frame on Youtube use the "." and "," keys.
 
Last edited:

Kevo

Legend
You can only do this with racquet face open a few degrees, right? Also I’m not talking lob type. Just any shot where ball hit at, e.g., belly level and passes the net several feet higher.

We are also pretty familiar with the fact that “launch angle” depends strongly on the stringbed qualities, like spacing, string movement, string slickiness.

There is definitely a range of effect with strings for sure. If you have something loose enough or stretchy enough you will certainly get a drag or slingshot like effect. I have played with racquets that have broken down multi strings that produce very interesting launches of the ball. So yeah, there is probably a lot more "degrees of slop" so to speak than I typically deal with if you factor in any kind of stringbed possible.
 

Kevo

Legend
You can only do this with racquet face open a few degrees, right?

Yes, that's kind of what I'm getting at. A very few degrees of difference in face angle can mean significantly different trajectories. Part of the reason for that is simply that the ball is round. Opening the face a bit not only changes the angle of the face, but also where on the surface of the ball the contact will happen. The more open the face the more likely it is your contact happens farther under the ball. I suspect we are making slight adjustments automatically just from experience. Our brains just figure it out after hitting thousands of balls.
 
Top