It amazes me how Nick has managed to fool so many people all of the time. These are the people who buy into his declaration that he can beat anyone at will and that he never loses a match he just tanks them. If it is in his gift to win or not win matches and titles, why is he so mean to himself, languishing at #21 in the world at age 22 and only has 1 x 500 and 2 x 250 titles in his career?
Why, after making the final in Beijing did he tank to Rafa yesterday, knowing he had title points to defend from Tokyo last year?
Why, when he made the final in Cincy did he tank to Dimitrov failing to take his first M1000 title?
Why did he tank to John Millman in the first round at the USO?
Why did he tank to his NextGen rival, Zverev, in Canada?
Why would he tank to world #106, Tennys Sandren in the 1st round in Washington?
Why did he tank to a doubles specialist, Herbert, in the 1st round at Wimbledon?
Why did he tank in the 2nd round at RG to Kevin Anderson?
Why did he tank to Nicholas Kicker in the 2nd round in Lyon?
Why did he tank to Rafa in Madrid if he says those are the sort of matches that get him out of bed?
Why did he not just beat Federer in 2 easy straight sets in Miami instead of losing in 3 TBs?
Why did he tank to Querrey in Acapulco in the SF?
Why did he fail to defend his title in Marseille by tanking to Tsonga in the SF?
Why did he tank to Seppi in the 2nd round in Australia?
I think he is hiding behind lack of interest in the game because he is not living up to expectations. The sooner the young players stop believing that once they've beaten a top player they's arrived, the better.