LM Prestige Mid vs Midplus

[roundiesee]

Sorry for starting another thread on the LM prestige, but would like to ask users of this why they chose their current version (ie either mid or midplus). Had a hit with the midplus yesterday and it was a really good racket, but can't help feeling that the mid may be a better stick. Unfortunately the store in question does not have the mid as a demo. Your thoughts please. Thanks!

 

[tarheelbornjohn]

They are both very good sticks. The mid is about 1/2 oz heavier. Very good for serve and groundstrokes. The mp felt better with volleys. I took the MP over the mid because I play doubles 50% of time and felt it would be better for doubles and no significant loss for singles since I s/v 50% of time now. If I was a 5.0 player I would go with the mid and 4.0 with mp and flip a coin for 4.5.

 

[babar]

I have just decided this week to switch to the LM Prestige MP. My decision was based on weight for the most part. I liked the way the mid felt also, but a bigger sweetspot and easier swingweight just made more sense to me.

 

[wao]

I have also switched to the LM Prestige mp I demo'd both for an extensive time. I felt that the slightly larger sweet spot was an plus. I served slightly better with the Mid, Ground strokes and returns MP, Volley's MP. Spin generation MP IMO. But it all is a personal preference so take the time and demo both if you have that option.
Wayne

 

[Tomek]

If I had one-handed backhand I would take Mid. Two hands=Mid Plus for me...