Nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer in multiple Slam years?

[Nadal_King]

Multiple slam seasons (atleast 2) nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer
Federer- 2004-2007,2009,2017- 6 years
Djokovic- 2011,2015,2016,2018,2019,2021- 6 years
Nadal- 2008,2010,2013,2017,2019- 5 years
Can Nadal match both this year or he matches Federer and Djokovic goes ahead to 7 together

 

[TimHenmanATG]

 

[Nadal_King]

Can you elaborate what you mean?

 

[Djokovic2011]

He almost certainly will but whether or not he can achieve back to back multi-slam seasons for the first time in his career will be much tougher, especially at the age of 36/37.

 

[TimHenmanATG]

Can you elaborate what you mean?

 

[IgoatFerlkeVogus]

Multiple slam seasons (atleast 2) nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer
Federer- 2004-2007,2009,2017- 6 years
Djokovic- 2011,2015,2016,2018,2019,2021- 6 years
Nadal- 2008,2010,2013,2017,2019- 5 years
Can Nadal match both this year or he matches Federer and Djokovic goes ahead to 7 together

I am extremely surprised if he can not match or go ahead to 7 together

 

[TennisHockey]

Can he match or surpass? Who knows.
Does having more multiple-slam years vs single slam years even matter though (assuming the total amount of slams stay the same)? I'm not sure.
For example let's say a player has 25 slams in his career. Was he better if he had 7 multiple-slam years vs 5? The former might mean he was more dominant in more years but it also means he had more years where he was less dominant.

 

[Nadal_King]

I am extremely surprised if he can not match or go ahead to 7 together

I mean can he go to 6 and Djokovic to 7 together

 

[Lorenn]

I looked at the data and Nadal is the only left handed playing player in the big three. Obviously this means he has had to overcome more then the others.

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

Can he match or surpass? Who knows.
Does having more multiple-slam years vs single slam years even matter though (assuming the total amount of slams stay the same)? I'm not sure.
For example let's say a player has 25 slams in his career. Was he better if he had 7 multiple-slam years vs 5? The former might mean he was more dominant in more years but it also means he had more years where he was less dominant.

The basic principle of Dominance of a short period vs Longevity... a matter of tastes, what matters at the end is the total..

 

[DSH]

Multiple slam seasons (atleast 2) nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer
Federer- 2004-2007,2009,2017- 6 years
Djokovic- 2011,2015,2016,2018,2019,2021- 6 years
Nadal- 2008,2010,2013,2017,2019- 5 years
Can Nadal match both this year or he matches Federer and Djokovic goes ahead to 7 together

Now or never, Mr. Nadal!

It is up to him to make an exclamation point and end with this ode of epicity, drama and heroism.

 

[Tennis_Freak99]

He'll match it this year, surpass? Nobody can tell

 

[Deleted member 762343]

And he only has one season with 3 slams won, Fedovic have each 3 of those.

 

[initialize]

And he only has one season with 3 slams won, Fedovic have each 3 of those.

Very true. Part of the reason why Nadal is the weakest of the Big 3

 

[Nadal_King]

Very true. Part of the reason why Nadal is the weakest of the Big 3

Have 2 slams on clay and 1 on Hc then we'll see

 

[Deleted member 788697]

I don't think it makes any difference, so no problem either way.
Either you have the 21 slam record or you don't, nothing can make up for that.

 

[Mustard]

John Steed?

 

[Tarkovsky]

Multiple slam seasons (at least 3) Nadal is 2 behind Djokovic and Federer:

Federer- 2004, 2006, 2007,- 3 years
Djokovic- 2011, 2015,, 2021- 3 years
Nadal- 2010- 1 year

Nadal is much behind Federer and Djokovic in triple-Slam seasons

 

[The_Mental_Giant]

Multiple slam seasons (at least 3) Nadal is 2 behind Djokovic and Federer:

Federer- 2004, 2006, 2007,- 3 years
Djokovic- 2011, 2015,, 2021- 3 years
Nadal- 2010- 1 year

Nadal is much behind Federer and Djokovic in triple-Slam seasons

And? That compensate by being slamsless less years.. Only 3 slamless years since 2005... Federer and Djokovic have a lot more

 

[IgoatFerlkeVogus]

I don't think it makes any difference, so no problem either way.
Either you have the 21 slam record or you don't, nothing can make up for that.

Totally agree. Thoughtful and very well said.

 

[Milanez82]

Multiple slam seasons (atleast 2) nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer
Federer- 2004-2007,2009,2017- 6 years
Djokovic- 2011,2015,2016,2018,2019,2021- 6 years
Nadal- 2008,2010,2013,2017,2019- 5 years
Can Nadal match both this year or he matches Federer and Djokovic goes ahead to 7 together

What about triple slam years

 

[The_Order]

And? That compensate by being slamsless less years.. Only 3 slamless years since 2005... Federer and Djokovic have a lot more

Fed: 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2019, 2020, 2021
Djokovic (we'll take it from after he won his first slam to be fair) : 2009, 2010, 2017

So Novak pretty much is even with Nadal after winning their first slam.

The difference is, despite being only one year younger, Novak started winning slams later than Nadal which is why Rafa is in front at the moment.

Total slamless years for all 3 since they started entering the slams:

Nadal: 5
Djokovic: 6
Federer: 12

 

[BeatlesFan]

Federer won 3/4 slams 5+ times. The other 2 haven't and will never do so.

 

[The Big Foe fan]

Multiple slam seasons (atleast 2) nadal is 1 behind Djokovic and Federer
Federer- 2004-2007,2009,2017- 6 years
Djokovic- 2011,2015,2016,2018,2019,2021- 6 years
Nadal- 2008,2010,2013,2017,2019- 5 years
Can Nadal match both this year or he matches Federer and Djokovic goes ahead to 7 together

VultureDal CapyBarafa

 

[TMF]

Have 2 slams on clay and 1 on Hc then we'll see

Have 2 slams on grass and we'll see

 

[TMF]

Federer won 3/4 slams 5+ times. The other 2 haven't and will never do so.