Always a good topic. No question Riggs threw the match. Not an issue. He was 55 at the time of the event. A world class top ranked 55 year old at that. In supreme health and condition. He had beaten Margaret Court soundly months before. Even though Court was unprepared for the ambush, he reportedly played and moved well. Against King, as you saw in the clips, he played like he was 80 years old. Generous to say his shots lacked pop or power. It was a joke to watch. He would say Court didn't train for him, which is why he rolled her so easily. On the other hand, when King saw what he did to Court, he would say, she went all in for match preparation. Blah blah. BS. When I was reading as much as I could about the Riggs / King thing years ago, conclusion consensus was he threw the match to set up a more profitable for him rematch. In the second match he could really bet some size on himself after establishing some doubt in the first go round. Unfortunately for Riggs, King was too sharp too bite on that. Some thought he bet on King. But, no evidence could be found. Not that bookies of that ilk talk a lot. I've come to accept the rematch angle. But, what OTL is saying about the mob is interesting. Sonny Liston went down that road. Riggs? Maybe. Look forward to seeing it.