"Pete Sampras says he could have beaten Roger Federer"

kimbahpnam

Hall of Fame
Someone sent me this. I thought I'd share.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/nationworld/wire/la-sp-random27-2009jul27,0,7820831.story

It is a dream video-game matchup, to be sure: Pete Sampras in his prime against Roger Federer in his prime. But what if such a matchup were actually possible, and they played each other on grass?

Who would win?

Sampras casts one vote for Sampras.

"I think one thing Roger doesn't see on grass is a true serve-and-volleyer, someone that's willing to come in and put pressure on him, make him pass, return," Sampras said during a recent conference call. "With these big serves, I don't think anyone really scares him. I think my game would make Roger a little more uncomfortable. I would come in on both serves, put pressure on his backhand, and go from there.

"Do I think I could have beaten Roger in my prime? Sure. I don't think anyone could beat me in my prime on grass. I felt unbeatable in the mid-'90s. But he'd be a tough guy to break, especially when he's hitting 50 aces like he did at Wimbledon. It would have been a great matchup."
 
Last edited:

jukka1970

Professional

yeah and if he came in on both serves, he'd be passed more times then there are grains of sand on a beach. I mean sorry, but if they were of the same era, Federer would have also used his serve and volley more, but it's not needed as much for the ones he plays now. Sampras wishes he could beat Federer on a consistent basis, grass court or not.
 
Top