))))..................)))...................................
"blood spatter indicates murder by lethal forehand"
The directions indicated by the strings in that photo are too consistent; I think you've stumbled across a murder scene where someone was battered over the backhand by the Nadal forehand.
"blood spatter indicates murder by lethal forehand"
That is red water and not red clay, which is the stuff that Nadal rules onthat would be surpringly similar to the soderlingement day's crime scene...
That is red water and not red clay, which is the stuff that Nadal rules on
Unless you are suggesting the Nadal is actually the Moses?
for sure ramesses is gonna be a tough opponent, i gonna have to use my best miracles to be ombiliable noHe certainly did some ombeleebable things, no?
Federer got same FH as Bjørn Borg.
The main benefit from such a thing would be to know what he feels he is doing.
A lot of the pros actually wouldn't know how to analyse their own strokes.
Rafa could be Moses incarnated. This seem to be the right.That is red water and not red clay, which is the stuff that Nadal rules on
Unless you are suggesting the Nadal is actually the Moses?
That video doesn't explain anything of value.
In fact, it is misleading, as far as how the efficiency of the stroke is achieved.
I guess that the above poast is all we will see as an arguments as to why you think that that video improves the efficiency of a FH stroke.
I am particularly mesmerised by the removal of the raquet, and how exactly its absence contributes to the improvement of the said efficiency.
I was anticipating that the conversation would stray from factual arguments to some sort of mumbo-jumbo talk, and you did not disappoint.
I smell a resident joke from thousands of miles.
Come back when you are ready to discuss the technical side of your claim.
)).................well, lucky 1s don't think, just do it, all embed/instinct. but that's after got everything right n played for many yrs though w/o much injuries. A lot of people especially youngsters got wrong idea n went to wrong direction then went further n further away from their goals n got injured, depressed n stressed out..............so the guys whom mil n mil are inspired by should come out to clear the air, in a way like 'celebrity clear up rumors', right:?))).......Shouldn’t the kid mimic nadal is he uses PD?Last Sunday a father/son pack I came across on the courts n the TE dad couldn't play with his 15 yro son so asked me to have a hit with him. According to what the boy said he got 'private coach' $60/hr a few times wkly but the fh was just shocking n right on the net or long by who knows what straight flat to the fence. Occasionally 2m 1m long still countable but straight flat my 6ft height on the fence, simply lost word n count. Though most of early/mid teens doing that n a lot saying copying 'Fed analysis' on the youtube ie racket butt cap point the ball then 'snap' wrist..........well, the wrist/arm won't last long n then good chance for me to buy their Babo PD really really cheap....lol.........
Fed really should come out here or on youtube to say something
What this video lack is the line and timing of waist turn.
))......sons play tennis dads suffer from TE, I've seen a lot......most of early mid teens have similar issues until reach 18 something then get bit better))).................
Did OP spill milk to his keyboard?
))).................no exception every1 of them blames their 'rackets/strings' n so angry that sell their rackets really cheap. Bad thing is >1/2 of them just simply quit tennis.))).................get mighty Feb come out to clear the air to save our well illusionized kids, lol mate)))..........................This video is the best video I watched so far as at least it got rid of the illusive racket with whole body view. I came across a lot of Fed fh slow motion youtubes only focus on upper body/arm/wrist/racket n a lot of kids trying to copy that with stationary chopstick-straight legs, I even saw some 'coaches' feeding balls to the early teens facing the ball rotating/twisting their wrist hard to get pace/topspin in 'Fed style'. Wtf the coaches were doing:?))) pocketing the nontennis parents $$ conducting early teen's wrist endurance test:?))) that's quite a few yrs ago, 1 of my son's team mates when playing junior comp. Then got wrist injury/TE out of sight since damn lost his dad's contact no. otherwise another couple of cheap Babo PD n Princes for me
Hope more video like this came out to clear the air as it's a very very basic/common practice to apply to anything ie taking apart any complex issue to do the trouble shooting ie modulating/isolating cross chk so at least can test/exam the '+-db gain' 'noise' etc etc 1 by 1 to find out where the root of the problem is................well easy talking hard walking............
)))...........n also I've got so many rackets over 100 (not that many now as sold a lot))) n tried all but found no differences TO ME at all (ofc huge differences to the balls))) why i look at topguns's rackets:?))).........only bring me attention if they get TE n hate the rackets then sell to me really cheap instead of smashing them)))....lol....................but don't talk about the legs/hips/turn etc.?
........
)))))).....................wat doya mean man:?))) 'the legs/hips/turn' + the free gravity on my racket head + free gravity on my 'body forward fall' maybe count 90% of the energy for my ball striking, hard to quantify it but at least 80% I reckon. Only use more arm/wrist/hand when the ball far out of my 'pre-determined/imagined' hitting zone/space n very very uncomfortable n no pace/accuracy n fall short like sitting duck n might just let it go
I don't understand what this post says.
I was talking about those "lot of Federer, Nadal etc. etc. video" you were mentioning that were that bad, and to which you compare this video you consider excellent.
It is interesting to me that you say that you predominantly pay attention to footwork etc. and ignore "arms/wrists/hands/raquets", and simultaneously are in awe of the video that has its main focus on the path that the hand follows as a result of the movement of the body and subsequent movement of the raquet.
I was just curious what you are comparing it to, that is all.
Please post some of those videos with bad advice and explain if possible why exactly that advice was bad.
))..........There're 2 things I like that video:
1. no excessive wrist 'twistnturn' stuff due to taking out the illusive racket.
2. The full body view ie foot work. That's exactly I want to watch this goat
I forgot how many times I was watching the topguns slow motion video n blablabla--ing all the bsht re. their arm/wrist/hand facing up/down stuff just simply turnoff the audio n only watch their foot work n the way they positioning themselves ie spacing as i don't use much arm etc anyway. But so so annoying zoomed in only upper body on the screen then i simply moved on to next video but happened again. Forgot how many times already. For gods or whatever's sake if i want to look their arms I might go for the one's they were chasing down some very difficult wide shots then to see how they used their arms/wrists to return the ball....like fh slice or something:?))))............
We are not seeing eye to eye.
You repeat what you already told me, and don't give me what I ask for.
Also, whatever this video is trying to achieve it is not focused on the footwork, and the most "amazing" part (the missing raquet) actually means that the area on focus is the one you say you are not interested in, so why are you in awe from it (and please, do not repeat the same thing for the 4th time)?
Show us those bad videos and tell us what was bad about them.
I got what I wanted to know with or without your voluntary assistance.
No further reports on your side are necessary.
))...................))))................
