Gros
New User
Hi everybody.
I'm going to talk here about spinwindow and power with references:
Racquet tilt = 5 deg
Racquet speed = 65mph
Swing angle = 30 deg
So far I played on a Prostaff BLX 6.1 95 and a Volkl Powerbridge 10 Mid.
For some time I was looking for a racket that could combine the blx 6.1 95 spin window (5.5) and wingweight (303kg / cm2) with the power of Volkl (shot is 3.40 feet inside baseline).
And after a long search I ended up turning to the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95.
Certainly, even if the swingweith (317kg / cm2) is greater than the blx, it remains slightly below the volkl (332kg / cm2). However, the 6.0 95 offers more power than the Volk.
However I am a little disappointed by the spinwindow of this 6.0 95. I touch the edge of the frame more often than with the blx 6.1 95.
Being totally addicted to the tools that are found online on the tennis warehouse website, I was very disappointed to find nothing about the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95.
In addition, while continuing my research, I am surprised to see that the Prostaff blx 6.1 90 (Federer’s one) to a spinwindow (5.71) much larger than almost all the rackets in 95 and therefore larger than that of the blx 6.1 95 (5.5), certainly due to the narrowness of the frame. And, his swingweight (324kg / cm2) is lower than the Volkl’s one (332kg / cm2), and his power is also above that of the Volkl (Volkl = shot is 3.40 feet inside baseline / blx 6.1 90 = 3.30).
I feel that this blx 6.1 90 would meet my expectations even more than 6.0 midplus 95.
Then I discovered the Powerangle Ace of Diamonds!
His characteristics are for me above all:
Swingweith of 322, spinwindow of 5.96, as much power as the blx 6.1 90, this racket seems perfect to me, except on one point:
I have always played in hybrid stringing (mains = natural gut / crosses = aluminum rough) and as this type of stringing is irrelevant on the Powerangle, I am afraid of losing spin effects.
So to see more clearly I have some questions to ask you:
1) Do you know the spinwindow of the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95?
2) Will I have as much effect on a PowerGangle in natural gut as on a PS 6.0 midplus 95 hybrid (mains = natural gut / crosses = aluminum rough)
3) Does the PS blx 6.1 90 really be a spinwindows higher than all 95 frames, and would it ultimately be the racket that would best combine spin, power, and handling?
Thank you for reading.
I'm going to talk here about spinwindow and power with references:
Racquet tilt = 5 deg
Racquet speed = 65mph
Swing angle = 30 deg
So far I played on a Prostaff BLX 6.1 95 and a Volkl Powerbridge 10 Mid.
For some time I was looking for a racket that could combine the blx 6.1 95 spin window (5.5) and wingweight (303kg / cm2) with the power of Volkl (shot is 3.40 feet inside baseline).
And after a long search I ended up turning to the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95.
Certainly, even if the swingweith (317kg / cm2) is greater than the blx, it remains slightly below the volkl (332kg / cm2). However, the 6.0 95 offers more power than the Volk.
However I am a little disappointed by the spinwindow of this 6.0 95. I touch the edge of the frame more often than with the blx 6.1 95.
Being totally addicted to the tools that are found online on the tennis warehouse website, I was very disappointed to find nothing about the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95.
In addition, while continuing my research, I am surprised to see that the Prostaff blx 6.1 90 (Federer’s one) to a spinwindow (5.71) much larger than almost all the rackets in 95 and therefore larger than that of the blx 6.1 95 (5.5), certainly due to the narrowness of the frame. And, his swingweight (324kg / cm2) is lower than the Volkl’s one (332kg / cm2), and his power is also above that of the Volkl (Volkl = shot is 3.40 feet inside baseline / blx 6.1 90 = 3.30).
I feel that this blx 6.1 90 would meet my expectations even more than 6.0 midplus 95.
Then I discovered the Powerangle Ace of Diamonds!
His characteristics are for me above all:
Swingweith of 322, spinwindow of 5.96, as much power as the blx 6.1 90, this racket seems perfect to me, except on one point:
I have always played in hybrid stringing (mains = natural gut / crosses = aluminum rough) and as this type of stringing is irrelevant on the Powerangle, I am afraid of losing spin effects.
So to see more clearly I have some questions to ask you:
1) Do you know the spinwindow of the Prostaff 6.0 midplus 95?
2) Will I have as much effect on a PowerGangle in natural gut as on a PS 6.0 midplus 95 hybrid (mains = natural gut / crosses = aluminum rough)
3) Does the PS blx 6.1 90 really be a spinwindows higher than all 95 frames, and would it ultimately be the racket that would best combine spin, power, and handling?
Thank you for reading.
