Interesting dialogue ^.
FWIW... I had problems with my serve being underpowered with the PT, and whilst the control was indeed exceptional, I wasn't killing off points quite as I'm capable. Furthermore, I experienced exactly the same syndrome with the i. Prestige. This rather major issue aside, I thought the feel and precision was absolutely a class apart. And as an interesting side-note... I also have experience of the Dunlop MW 200G (the rod that the PT is often likened to) and found it to possess exactly the right, slightly higher power level (just a few notches up from the PT) for me on serves, BUT... the feel wasn't my cup of tea.
Anyway. It's pretty rare to hear a dissenting voice as regards the PT. I was told that because I'm only an intermediate level that's why I wasn't getting much joy in the power dept. I didn't disagree. That said, I'm fairly certain there's a lot more who also haven't quite reached the stratospheric heights of tennis brilliance as befits the reputation of this legendary frame. Basically, I do feel with certain, often older player's frames (like say the PT or PS 85) or frames which are in vogue (like the MG Prestige Pro now) that people are reluctant to 'fess up' and admit they aren't actually playing such awesome tennis with these rods after-all.
BTW, I do acknowledge tandayu's wise words:
Just a few thoughts...