Slams won when the other Big3 were in the top10
- Thread starter Madinolf
- Start date
D
Deleted member 780630
Guest
Slams won where the player wore their pants backwards in the trophy ceremony:
Federer 1
Everyone else 0
Federer 1
Everyone else 0
Third Serve
Talk Tennis Guru
This stat is utterly, completely meaningless, you know that right?
Exactly the kind I’d expect from a revered professor of Lewisian statistics.
Exactly the kind I’d expect from a revered professor of Lewisian statistics.
Russeljones
Talk Tennis Guru
You know there is a tennis tournament going on now? You might have heard of it, it is in England, the United Kingdom.
Keep your rubbish stat peddling for the off-season.
DRII
G.O.A.T.
But, Murray was in ATG form in at least a couple of those finals (pre back surgery).
MichaelNadal
Bionic Poster
Martin J
Hall of Fame
So was Delpo at the USO 2009. Anyway, this is not a dig at Novak, just trolling that fanboy.
spottishwood
Hall of Fame
Slams won defeating a 90s ATG.
Fed - 3
Nadal & Novak- 0
Fed - 3
Nadal & Novak- 0
ForehandCross
G.O.A.T.
I don't know why should someone be fined for being born earlier and winning earlier. It's Like Federer should have waited for Djokovic to get in top 10 and then told himself "Okay now I can start wining my slams ,they will now be validated"
Third Serve
Talk Tennis Guru
By this same metric, the Big 3 have certainly played below ATG level in some of their finals.
Kralingen
Talk Tennis Guru
The second anyone starts discounting any Slam win, you immediately know that they have an agenda and should not be taken seriously.
Putting context around victories and making historical comparisons is one thing. Spouting “weak era” nonsense is the worst part of this website. A Slam is a Slam.
RF-18
Talk Tennis Guru
Why is it worthless? You are beating the best players of the world in every slam won. It is an objective measure.
Backspin1183
Talk Tennis Guru
Source?
D
Deleted member 779124
Guest
Of course this ignores how they actually played on the day.
D
Deleted member 771911
Guest
Misleading for obvs reasons.
Djokovic is the best of the best; Nadal is the best on clay; Federer is the best of the not so good.
Kidding aside, it really shows that, when all 3 were on their game and rolling, Djokovic was the one to take it. I bet a lot of Nadal's 17 'wins' came at RG, where it didn't really matter who were in the field.
Kidding aside, it really shows that, when all 3 were on their game and rolling, Djokovic was the one to take it. I bet a lot of Nadal's 17 'wins' came at RG, where it didn't really matter who were in the field.
Last edited:
NoleIsBoat
Hall of Fame
03-07 -> 12 slams win facing Roddick, Hewitt, Bagdhatis, Baby Nadal, Kiefer. Only 4/12 slams win facing big4.
08-12 -> 5 slams won, with only 2 going through big4.
Why the huge drop in results? Peak ended aged 26?
08-12 -> 5 slams won, with only 2 going through big4.
Why the huge drop in results? Peak ended aged 26?
RS
Bionic Poster
How many slams beating ATGs (6 slam champions + Murray?
TearTheRoofOff
G.O.A.T.
Med is no.2.
That is all.
That is all.
Similar threads
- Poll
