So now the question is...

[sh@de]

Now fed has lost 2 more slam finals than Sampras has ever lost and Fed's slam final win/loss ratio is worse than Sampras. Now Fed has won 71%(15-6) of the slam finals which he has competed in, and Sampras ended his career having won 78%(14-4) of the slam finals which he competed in.

Fed's champion qualities diminish with each slam final that he loses just as his champion qualities increase with each slam final that he wins, so this loss to Delpo means he becomes less of a champion.

So he should just lose at the SF's so that his slam final record doesn't diminish right? Great logic there. LOL