The last few days I have been re-watching some of the matches of that great Masters of 1994. I still have old VHS tapes with some of those matches of that tournament ( Becker-Edberg, Becker-Sampras, Edberg-Sampras, Agassi-Bruguera, Agassi-Chang, Bruguera-Chang, the two SF: Sampras-Agassi and Becker-Bruguera, and the final: Sampras-Becker).
Seriously, great matches all of them. Yesterday was watching Agassi-Chang and Agassi-Bruguera: great aggressive baseline tennis on a medium (compared to that era, today it would be called fast) indoor carpet.
Some people don't remember that Chang was actually quite aggressive, both with his return of serve and with his ground strokes (and serve!), hitting them extremely early on the rise (even earlier than Agassi some may say) and flat, when playing on indoor carpet.
And Agassi was just....too strong, and too good. What a player Andre was (when focused!).
Also, even though Bruguera's retrieving skills are amazing, and he had a very very good serve (hit a ton of aces in this match) and solid heavy ground strokes, it is just that Agassi constant pressure is too much at the end.
Seriously, great matches all of them. Yesterday was watching Agassi-Chang and Agassi-Bruguera: great aggressive baseline tennis on a medium (compared to that era, today it would be called fast) indoor carpet.
Some people don't remember that Chang was actually quite aggressive, both with his return of serve and with his ground strokes (and serve!), hitting them extremely early on the rise (even earlier than Agassi some may say) and flat, when playing on indoor carpet.
And Agassi was just....too strong, and too good. What a player Andre was (when focused!).
Also, even though Bruguera's retrieving skills are amazing, and he had a very very good serve (hit a ton of aces in this match) and solid heavy ground strokes, it is just that Agassi constant pressure is too much at the end.