Volkl DNX 9 comparison

barry

Hall of Fame
I have been looking for a replacement frame for my discontinued Prostaff surge for a while and found one of the new Volkl DNX 9’s. Took 9 days to get here from the U.K. but wanted to post a review of how it worked for me.

http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/644/dsc021827wa.jpg

Current Racket
Prostaff Surge, leather grip, ½ ounce lead in handle, strung Gosen Polylon 17 mains PSGD 16 crosses. Basically, a head light lively frame with dead strings and leather grip.
DNX 9
Weight strung 11.8 ounces 4 ½ size, Burnt Orange color, Strung 1 piece Gosen Polylon SP 17 54 pounds. I like the handle / grip on the DNX 9, it is flat enough to fit your hand, much better fit than Wilson or Head.
Game Style
4.5 / 5.0 player mostly singles 4 days a week. Counter puncher, with a good net game. I buy new rackets, string them myself, test them, and if they don’t work out sell them. Demo’s seldom worked for me. Either way you lose about $20 to $30, so you might as well test the frames the way you want them and pass them along.
Frames tested so far:
Prince O3 tour – loved the racket, but hated the lack of sound when you hit the ball
Head FXP Radical – shoulder problem after 2 hours hitting, not for me
Nsix-One (16x18) – Very solid frame, number 1 at this point, great for all around play
Ncode Surge – Plays much livelier than my old prostaff version, to much power!
The way I test frames:
Each Sunday we do a 2 ½ hour practice session. We do 5 drills Ground Strokes, Volleys, Service line to service line volleys, Overheads, and Serves, then play couple of sets. Today I compared the (Wilson Surge, Wilson Nsix-one, and the DNX 9). Power wise the order was Surge, Nsix-one, and DNX 9. The DNX 9 was has less power than the Nsix-one 95 which surprised me. If you swing through the ball the DNX 9 really went, and was very stable, but you had to hit it. I got use to head light rackets, both the Surge (after mod) and Nsix-one is about 10 point Head Light. The DNX 9 is more even balance and you can really crank serves and overheads. I had my partner hit a few short lobs, and with the DNX 9 it was easy to bounce them over the fence either side. Normally hard for me to do on the backhand, but it was easy. Volleys, for me I need a little help from the racket to get pace, and the Surge was the strongest followed by the Nsix-One. The DNX 9 provided more control than the other two frames.
Overall it was a good practice session; we played two sets rotating rackets every 2nd game. It became apparent during the match that the DNX 9 was not powerful enough for my game. I could serve and volley well, but it is not my style, and my practice partner mentioned I had less power on my ground strokes using the DNX 9 than the Surge. Control has never been an issue in my game, it is knocking off winners that is tough. Strange because my practice partner had more pop using the DNX 9 than the Nsix-One. The DNX 9 is one of the most stable frames I have ever hit with, and I love the handle / grip, it fits perfect. Over time I could probably learn to play with it, but at this time I plan on staying with the Surge.
http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/903/dsc021832tz.jpg
 

SC in MA

Professional
Thanks for the review Barry. Sorry to hear the DNX9 was underpowered for you. That's one concern I have about this racket. I am glad that it served well though. That's another area I'm concerned about. I'm really hoping this racket will click for me as I would really like to find a racket to stick with for at least a couple of years. I'm kind of hoping it will play like a lighter, more manueverable version of the n61 95, but with the same stability and pop. I'm sure this is wishful thinking !

It'll be interesting to hear your thoughts after a few more sessions, and maybe under tight match conditions, which to me is the time you really learn about a racket.
 

NoBadMojo

G.O.A.T.
Hi Barry. Good post. It would be helpful if you stated string and reference tension of the frames as that seriously affects things like power levels. Both of the other frames are likely designed to be more powerful than the DNX9, so the DNX9 may benefit by lower tensions for you (think the Surge is stiffer and the N6.1 heavier). I've found that many people string certain frames too tightly or with a strng that precludes the racquet from responding well (not saying you do). if you are more of a baseliner, you may like the DNX8 altho it isnt so headlight. It's more of an impact frame and easier to put the ball away with. If you're getting rid of your DNX9, I can find a home for it provided you wish to trade for a DNX8. drop your email addy in here if interested. thx
 

barry

Hall of Fame
NoBadMojo said:
Hi Barry. Good post. It would be helpful if you stated string and reference tension of the frames as that seriously affects things like power levels. Both of the other frames are likely designed to be more powerful than the DNX9, so the DNX9 may benefit by lower tensions for you (think the Surge is stiffer and the N6.1 heavier). I've found that many people string certain frames too tightly or with a strng that precludes the racquet from responding well (not saying you do). if you are more of a baseliner, you may like the DNX8 altho it isnt so headlight. It's more of an impact frame and easier to put the ball away with. If you're getting rid of your DNX9, I can find a home for it provided you wish to trade for a DNX8. drop your email addy in here if interested. thx

I strung the DNX 9 with Gosen Poly SP, the Nsix-one was also SP, and the Surge is Polylon 17 + PSGD crosses all at 54 pounds. To me the DNX 9 had a lot of control and was very stable. Very powerful on serves and overheads, I could learn to play with it, but the Surge is like a PD clone, and is more powerful. For my game I need a bit more power. I was taught like a typist, consistency, accuracy, and speed. Never made it to speed / power.

Not complaining about the racket, it is very nice, sturdy, and well engineered, Volkl has a winner, but for me I need a little bit more power. I could experiment with string, but for my test wanted to keep everything consistent.
 

NoBadMojo

G.O.A.T.
barry said:
I strung the DNX 9 with Gosen Poly SP, the Nsix-one was also SP, and the Surge is Polylon 17 + PSGD crosses all at 54 pounds. To me the DNX 9 had a lot of control and was very stable. Very powerful on serves and overheads, I could learn to play with it, but the Surge is like a PD clone, and is more powerful. For my game I need a bit more power. I was taught like a typist, consistency, accuracy, and speed. Never made it to speed / power.

Not complaining about the racket, it is very nice, sturdy, and well engineered, Volkl has a winner, but for me I need a little bit more power. I could experiment with string, but for my test wanted to keep everything consistent.

makes sense Barry. thats why i suggested the DNX8 to you as that is also like a PD without the downsides. The DNX9 is more an allcourters frame and the 8 more for baselining <in general>. you obviously would get more power with more powerful strings than what you're using
 

TennisMD

Professional
NBMJ:

What are the advantages of the DNX 9 compared to the tour 10 MP Gen 1 specifically a) crispness of ground stroke and heavy ball potential
b) serve without having to work at it ie the first time you picked up the DNX did it serve better specifically the actiion you can put on the ball
c) arm comfort
d) sweet spot
 

NoBadMojo

G.O.A.T.
TennisMD said:
NBMJ:

What are the advantages of the DNX 9 compared to the tour 10 MP Gen 1 specifically a) crispness of ground stroke and heavy ball potential
b) serve without having to work at it ie the first time you picked up the DNX did it serve better specifically the actiion you can put on the ball
c) arm comfort
d) sweet spot

aye,
a) they have very diff feels. the Gen1 is flexy in the throat and the 9 is not. it feels more of a universal stiffness and you can feel the stringbed more rather than the racquet flexing (or at least i can). Volkl specs are typically quite revealing as their stuff most often plays just as the specs indicate. The Gen1 will hit a heavier ball I believe because of its greater mass and more weight in the head, but the DNX9 is much easer to swing fast, so you can really spin it and hit it hard.
b) serve right out of the stringing machine immediately required less energy for the same result. you still need good technique to make the dnx9 serve well, but it clearly serves better. My 75% serve with the DNx9 is about = my 90% with the Gen1. I dont as yet have the timning to hit 90% serves wit the DN9 but am looking forward to that
c and d) inside the sweetspot both frames are very comfortable. outside the DNX9 feels a bit more shock (but not bad). sweetspot is huge and bigger in the Gen1, but the DNX9 has a nicely sized sweetspot.
To me the DNX9 is like a kicked up easier to flush hit T10VEMid. They could have easly included this frame in the 10series I think and I can see why Stepanek switched to it from the Mid. he also had 8 aces in a row recently and i dont think was ever noted as a great server before.
hows this for more informaton that you maybe wanted?
 

barry

Hall of Fame
NoBadMojo said:
makes sense Barry. thats why i suggested the DNX8 to you as that is also like a PD without the downsides. The DNX9 is more an allcourters frame and the 8 more for baselining <in general>. you obviously would get more power with more powerful strings than what you're using

I need a racket which will help me play like Federer did in the second set today. He destroyed Blake with so many winners from everywhere on the court. Federer was unbelievable!
That would be racket technology innovation. Always looking for the perfect stick.
DanMan may buy the DX 9; I plan on deciding tomorrow what to do with it.
 

NoBadMojo

G.O.A.T.
barry said:
I need a racket which will help me play like Federer did in the second set today. He destroyed Blake with so many winners from everywhere on the court. Federer was unbelievable!
That would be racket technology innovation. Always looking for the perfect stick.
DanMan may buy the DX 9; I plan on deciding tomorrow what to do with it.

Unfortunately Blake gagged away the first set and that seemed to spillover into the 2nd when he just caved in..Fed rode out the early storm and let Blake give him the rest of the match it seemed to me. I dont think Blake matches up very well with Fed....nadal does tho. A nice tourney for Blake altho i think he should learn to vary his groundstrokes a bit more rather than always playing low net clearance high risk T all the time..it's just too easy to get off your game at the wrong moments playing that way I think.
No worries on the DNX9....i have a couple of them, but if you wish to do a trade, I'm game. whatever you like is fine w. me
 

TennisMD

Professional
NBMJ

This is very helpful the changes you describe are exactly what I am looking for in the volkl line, happy hitting. I guess we will see when TW comes out with the DNX 9, I am looking forward to giving it a go.
 
Top