Weakest slam winners

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Hardcore Federer fans at the suggestion Hewitt and Safin aren't gods:

Shocked.gif

How about being of an age to watch them and recognize them as worthy winners? I struggle to understand how it can be fashionable to talk rubbish about legitimate champions.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
How about being of an age to watch them and recognize them as worthy winners? I struggle to understand how it can be fashionable to talk rubbish about legitimate champions.

How about taking a joke, having a beer and not being condescending? They are great champions indeed, but not in the caliber TMF sees them. If Hewitt and Safin are really ALL THAT with 2 slams then I struggle to see how these same posters minimize Nadal, Djokovic and Sampras to make Federer look better.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Hardcore Federer fans at the suggestion Hewitt and Safin aren't gods:

Shocked.gif
They aren't God's, but they are better than Gaudio, Johansson, and a whole slew of other players that should be mentioned.

Demolishing an All Time Great in a slam final isn't grounds for the mentioned to be "weak"; simply those who do so are haters who underrate these players and push up weak players like Ferrer.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
They aren't God's, but they are better than Gaudio, Johansson, and a whole slew of other players that should be mentioned.

Demolishing an All Time Great in a slam final isn't grounds for the mentioned to be "weak"; simply those who do so are haters who underrate these players and push up weak players like Ferrer.

Calm down Hewitt-girl, I don't think he's weak and Hewitt is still one of my favorite players. Gods+Gif= get what I'm saying. Safin was my fav player before Nadal and after Roddick. They're both overrated on this BOARD, nothing more nothing less.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
How about taking a joke, having a beer and not being condescending? They are great champions indeed, but not in the caliber TMF sees them. If Hewitt and Safin are really ALL THAT with 2 slams then I struggle to see how these same posters minimize Nadal, Djokovic and Sampras to make Federer look better.

I don't believe I have ever seen this degree of aggrandizing of Hewitt and Safin that you speak of, I'm sorry. What I do know is I hate the way players with fewer/no Slams and sub/Masters tournaments are talked about here. It is no laughing matter.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Calm down Hewitt-girl, I don't think he's weak and Hewitt is still one of my favorite players. Gods+Gif= get what I'm saying. Safin was my fav player before Nadal and after Roddick. They're both overrated on this BOARD, nothing more nothing less.
Hewitt-girl? I'm not even a girl to begin with. :lol: I'm not just a fan of Hewitt either. I actually like Nadal, Federer, Murray, Hewitt and a whole range of other players but keep trying to denounce me for no reason. I used to think you were a good poster, but after that, I don't know anymore.

I don't think either are overrated, they are underrated by the vast majority of people here (comparing them to players who wouldn't win anything and saying if they transported such players into a different time they'd win more or as much).
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
I don't believe I have ever seen this degree of aggrandizing of Hewitt and Safin that you speak of, I'm sorry. What I do know is I hate the way players with fewer/no Slams and sub/Masters tournaments are talked about here. It is no laughing matter.

Disagree with the first sentence, it's all over the place! Totally agree with the second sentence.

Hewitt-girl? I'm not even a girl to begin with. :lol: I'm not just a fan of Hewitt either. I actually like Nadal, Federer, Murray, Hewitt and a whole range of other players but keep trying to denounce me for no reason. I used to think you were a good poster, but after that, I don't know anymore.

I don't think either are overrated, they are underrated by the vast majority of people here (comparing them to players who wouldn't win anything and saying if they transported such players into a different time they'd win more or as much).

Really? I thought Djoko2011 or someone else said you were a chick? Sorry :) Is cco a chick? That must be who I'm thinking about :)
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
How about being of an age to watch them and recognize them as worthy winners? I struggle to understand how it can be fashionable to talk rubbish about legitimate champions.

According to their Nadal fanatics, Hewitt/Safin a weak champions who beat Sampras on his home court(USO).

And they have the nerve to say Hewitt/Safin are overrated on this board. lol
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
According to their Nadal fanatics, Hewitt/Safin a weak champions who beat Sampras on his home court(USO).

And they have the nerve to say Hewitt/Safin are overrated on this board. lol

Pete was past his peak and retired in 02. I recall your horde making age excuses for your savior back when he was 29.
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
Pete was past his peak and retired in 02. I recall your horde making age excuses for your savior back when he was 29.

And Hewitt/Safin were still young, so that cancel out.

Federer didn't have a back problem in 2010. He suffered back problem throughout the entire 2013.
 

Bukmeikara

Legend
You can say that someone like Hewitt present time is past his peak with multiple early exits in the Slams but not for someone who is playing Grand Slam finals .. this is just hilarious.
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
You can say that someone like Hewitt present time is past his peak with multiple early exits in the Slams but not for someone who is playing Grand Slam finals .. this is just hilarious.

Hewitt had surgery five times in the last six years !
Big difference.

When he was at his best(2004/2005), he was a beast.

The only hilarious here is the amount of denigration toward Hewitt by the anti-Fed brigade.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Hewitt had surgery five times in the last six years !
Big difference.

When he was at his best(2004/2005), he was a beast.

The only hilarious here is the amount of denigration toward Hewitt by the anti-Fed brigade.

Hewitt and Safin won 2 slams. That's how good they were. That's a huge compliment. Both guys are awesome. But that's the extent of their greatness. Right on Murray level for me.
 

Carsomyr

Legend
Hewitt and Safin won 2 slams. That's how good they were. That's a huge compliment. Both guys are awesome. But that's the extent of their greatness. Right on Murray level for me.

As I iterated in another thread, Kodes won three yet I wouldn't put him over either Safin or Hewitt. Slam count may be the most important metric, but context is important, too.

That said, there are enough people overrating them and enough people underrating them that I think their historical significance among the tennis populus balances out.
 
S

Sirius Black

Guest
Hewitt and Safin won 2 slams. That's how good they were. That's a huge compliment. Both guys are awesome. But that's the extent of their greatness. Right on Murray level for me.

So your boy's right on Sampras level, no greater?
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
As I iterated in another thread, Kodes won three yet I wouldn't put him over either Safin or Hewitt. Slam count may be the most important metric, but context is important, too.

That said, there are enough people overrating them and enough people underrating them that I think their historical significance among the tennis populus balances out.

Indeed, Kodes won his slams in some depleted fields and was not a YE #1 like Hewitt was.
 
Top