If all the present courts and balls were the same as they were in 1990? That means speed, height of bounce, skidding, etc. I think the big hitters would jump above all the clay court specialists, but Fed would still stay at #1. Nadal would be a lot farther down, along with Davydenko, Murray, and Djokovic. Soderling, Del Potro, Roddick, and Cilic would be duking it out for #2. You would either have to have a huge serve, huge flat forehand, or good volleys. Constructing a point would mean that you better hit that big flat winner before the other player does. Just keeping the ball in play would be a recipe for disaster. Total power tennis domination.
The only reason this was not necessarily the case in 1990 is the developments in racket and string technology.
Now, I am not asking if you like that brand of tennis and I don't care if you like that brand of tennis. I am only asking what you think the rankings would be in this situation.
The only reason this was not necessarily the case in 1990 is the developments in racket and string technology.
Now, I am not asking if you like that brand of tennis and I don't care if you like that brand of tennis. I am only asking what you think the rankings would be in this situation.