Sysyphus
Talk Tennis Guru
While the field for the Men's Singles Title may be looking barren indeed, we might be looking at one of the strongest moral fields for some time.
Let's consider the main favorites:
Rafael Nadal
Case for: Unrivaled experience in winning moral titles; planted the seeds of a moral AO victory already at the end of last season; exceptional humility increases moral sympathies.
Case against: The eternal conundrum of the boy who cried wolf one too many time.
Novak Djokovic
Case for: Long injury layoff; has won many actual AOs, which should improve chances of winning a moral title if he's hindered this time; amped up tournament prep by pulling out of Exo.
Case against: Reportedly believes that "we are the creators of our own destiny and our own paths and what we really want," which would paradoxically entail that a potential loss would be exactly what he really wanted and deserved.
Andy Murray
Case for: The most dramatic-looking injury of all; theatrical expertise; can be counted on to make tactical political/humanitarian press statements to increase his moral stock; tragical record in AO finals induces sympathy.
Case against: Overly dramatic expressions of suffering may backfire and decrease moral sympathies.
Roger Federer
Case for: The sneaky dark horse, might be planning an elaborate tragic arc where he looks like a sure favorite going into the tournament but eventually dramatically succumbs to a broken back and a court slowed down more than TTW's server during the AO final.
Case against: Preparation seemingly not as thorough as his main rivals; unmatched self-confidence might reduce moral sympathies.
Whom do you favor for the coveted moral title?
Let's consider the main favorites:
Rafael Nadal
Case for: Unrivaled experience in winning moral titles; planted the seeds of a moral AO victory already at the end of last season; exceptional humility increases moral sympathies.
Case against: The eternal conundrum of the boy who cried wolf one too many time.
Novak Djokovic
Case for: Long injury layoff; has won many actual AOs, which should improve chances of winning a moral title if he's hindered this time; amped up tournament prep by pulling out of Exo.
Case against: Reportedly believes that "we are the creators of our own destiny and our own paths and what we really want," which would paradoxically entail that a potential loss would be exactly what he really wanted and deserved.
Andy Murray
Case for: The most dramatic-looking injury of all; theatrical expertise; can be counted on to make tactical political/humanitarian press statements to increase his moral stock; tragical record in AO finals induces sympathy.
Case against: Overly dramatic expressions of suffering may backfire and decrease moral sympathies.
Roger Federer
Case for: The sneaky dark horse, might be planning an elaborate tragic arc where he looks like a sure favorite going into the tournament but eventually dramatically succumbs to a broken back and a court slowed down more than TTW's server during the AO final.
Case against: Preparation seemingly not as thorough as his main rivals; unmatched self-confidence might reduce moral sympathies.
Whom do you favor for the coveted moral title?
Last edited: