I disagree with the implication that only an elitist can play with this racquet. I’m not sure if any of use can maximize any racquet, or play it to its intended potential. Granted, the sv95 is slightly underpowered, but it’s very subjective as well.
I said "elite" not "elitist" ! Those words have completely different meanings in this context.
Any player can play with any racquet they like. But "How well can they play with a racquet?". More importantly, "Does the racquet aid or hinder their chances of winning tennis matches?".
As an example, so many players pursue the idea that playing with a smaller headed more flexible racquet will improve their game when in many cases using a larger hooped stiffer frame makes playing and WINNING matches so much easier.
Of course, it all depends on the goal. Different players have different goals.
But IMO, once a tennis player gets to a certain point of development, the main goal should be to WIN tennis matches. Tennis racquets and string are simply tools of the trade. Pick the best tools to maximise the chances of achieving the main goal
Proof of the pudding is in the eating. Even Roger Federer is on record saying that perhaps he should have switched to a larger hoop size at least a couple of years sooner than he did.
Who knows how many more Majors Roger would have won if he had been wielding the 97 four or five years earlier than he did?