Bungalo Bill, I think you are promoting yourself unreasonably here as being well versed; I would characterize a pro as well versed if he knows all aspects of the game, including all tenets about modern tennis.
Oh, I don't think so Oscar. A pro may or may not be well versed in a topic. They may not understand learning theory or other aspects of coaching. You should know that because if that were true, then you should be listening to instructors that are your peers or have provided you evidence which you continue to deny.
Case in point, your "modern forehand" which you claimed was your discovery or something like that. I showed you pictures from 1926 showing players hitting with the exact forehand you describe.
Further, your farfetched example on hitting early, I provided information that you might have taken that out of context. However, we could also take your "hitting across the ball" out of context as well.
Whether you like it or not Oscar, I have proven that I am well versed by even you and your past compliments on what I have provided in a variety of areas. Even your John Carpenter has complimented the knowledge I have in tennis instruction, fundamentals, tennis history, and tennis insight. He even has personally emailed me for input and advice.
You may know these, but your dismissal of such in such irresponsible manner in regards to readers, not just posters, makes me question your science knowledge, from gravity, friction and air resistance, impact force, acceleration vs momentum, muscle groups, kinetic chains, and the like.
Oscar, this is nonsense and you know it.
You sure can express your opinion, but don't sell yourself as an expert if you are not. Otherwise you muddle the debate of so many people interested in learning and trying different things to see which work and which don't, deciding what to adopt on their own determinism.
Yup, I sure can. I guess the years and years of auditing has paid off! Being well-versed in something does make me a subject-matter expert. However, being well-versed does not mean I know everything but have enough knowledge and experience to provide guidance, instruction, and an opinion on the topic at hand. It means my opinion, diagnosis, or insight can be considered reasonable and reliable or most importantly - valid. It also means I can cut to the chase quicker than those that are growing in stroke analysis, instruction, and other aspect of tennis and provide a reasonable and reliable opinion on the subject.
Isn't that how you believe people learn Oscar? I believe I have grown to the point where I can feel, sense, use my intuition, and draw on past experience concerning the subject at hand. I can sense when something smells fishy and pursue it until my curiosity is satisfied. I am also more aware when I am being sold a bill of goods and can help others avoid a big mistake. At the very least, I can provide an opinion and a warning of sorts to help a tennis player become more aware of what they are getting into.
No matter how you slice it Oscar, I am well versed.
By presenting your viewpoint in a responsible and intelligent manner you'll contribute to the debate, rather than your present actions to destroy. I hold you responsible for having several interesting and educational threads erased from this Forum. Your personal attacks on myself show that you take the debate into other arenas to make small of others and look yourself bigger. What you have done is make yourself look smaller than you probably are.
Oscar I don't mind views being presented in an honest and responsible light. However, I didn't experience that from your followers and you. I thought you were sneaky, had a hidden agenda, where more interested in using this site to sell your product, etc...I think you need to look in the mirror.
And if my hard questions bother you, all you are telling me is you really are hiding something.
Prove your technical points, like I have proven mine half the way (or more) around the world, something that you can't disprove no matter what you say. Furthermore, prove that you are a valuable member of these discussions and this Forum by sticking to the subject at hand, and I will forgive the damage you have anonymously done.
Come on, Oscar, you haven't proven jack. Others have for you. The only thing you have proven is you are not the Father of Modern Tennis. My advice and instruction comes from years and years of research. I do not claim I created the instruction or performed the research. I am a coach, I use the honest hardwork of others (just as you do) to help players improve.
I would take half these players here, free of charge, and give them an excellent lesson and instruction just as I do now in my area. I don't need fanfare, getting in the limelight or anything else. When a player offers me money or at least to buy me dinner, I turn it down and tell them that my service is free of charge - period.
I want tennis to grow. I want players to learn. I want players to respect the establishments that have helped this young sport continue on. I don't want players to put their hard earned money into my pockets. I want their hard earned money to go into their families, the things they love to do, and the charities they support.
Give me a break Oscar, the only thing I see about you is you have a hidden agenda that you aren't being truthful about, and you have taken claim for things that aren't yours to claim. How can I respect that.