tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
Finally something big on the horizon. The only big names missing are Nadal and Del Potro. This tournament could pretty much decide who ends the year at no 1. Who's your pick?
I heard Ferrer also announced he won't be in Shanghai.
Ferrer is currently playing in Beijing. Shanghai is a Masters and therefore not optional for him. He will incur penalties if he decides to skip it.
Not any more he's not - just pulled out against Lu in the 1st set
2010: Murray
2011: Murray
2012: Murray
Yes, Murray.
Murray def. Federer 7-6 6-4
Federer will tank long before the final. Gotta keep the Murray h2h in check and stay fresh for Basel.
Federer leading the poll, despite the fact that he is probably not going to win.
Classic TW stuff.
Not sure if this is the right place to ask this question but why would Federer skip Masters 1000 tournaments but never miss Basel? I know it's his hometown and all but it doesn't seem like a wise choice, ranking and scheduling wise.
Yep, that's Talk Tennis. Just like AO 2012 SF, when Federer was predicted by voters to win in 4 sets, when the outcome was always going to be Nadal in 3 or 4.
He has to play at least 4 500 tournies. He'll play Dubai, Basel, Rotterdam plus Olies, so that's 4. I don't know if there's a requirement for 250s, but he's played Halle and Doha as well.
Nadal would never straight set Federer in a hard court slam, he barely scraped through the 2009 AO final and they never played at the US Open which is by far Federer's best slam and Nadal's worst.
Most successful Slams:
Federer:
1. Wimbledon (8 finals: 7 wins, 1 loss).
2. US Open ((6 finals: 5 wins, 1 loss).
3. Australian Open (4 finals: 4 wins).
4. French Open ( 5 finals: 1 win, 4 losses).
Nadal:
1. French Open (7 finals: 7 wins).
2. Wimbledon (5 finals: 2 wins, 3 losses).
Joint 3. Australian Open (2 finals: 1win, 1 loss).
Joint 3. United States Open (2 finals: 1win, 1 loss).
Where's Djokovic?
Where's Djokovic?
So, going by the draw, advantage Djokovic?
What happens if he doesn't?
As bjk wrote, a committment player can count 6 sub-1000 tournaments, up to four of them 500s.
If he doesn't play enough 500s, he doesn't get any points from that "slot" - meaning even if he won three 250s, he'd only get to count two of them
He wasn't supposed to win in Madrid...and he did. TT learned from their doubts at Wimbledon too.
Federer will win every tournament he enters......though most likely he will win 60 percent of them!
His potential SF opponent is probably easier but Fed should not have much trouble reaching the SF at least.
Murray's seems to get tougher a bit earlier.
The draw looks decent for Federer to the semis, no real big threats. Then there's Murray in the semis and Djokovic in the finals.
See, that no 1 rank is worthless if he's getting the no 3 seed every single freaking time instead of the no 4.
Well, considering Berdych is the 4th seed here, I'm not so sure Fed would prefer that.
Pretty good draw for Raonic in Shanghai
http://www.atpworldtour.com/posting/2012/5014/mds.pdf
shots at Tsonga, Berdych (QF), Djokovic, Federer (in order)
Well, considering Berdych is the 4th seed here, I'm not so sure Fed would prefer that.
Most successful Slams:
Federer:
1. Wimbledon (8 finals: 7 wins, 1 loss).
2. US Open ((6 finals: 5 wins, 1 loss).
3. Australian Open (4 finals: 4 wins).
4. French Open ( 5 finals: 1 win, 4 losses).
Nadal:
1. French Open (7 finals: 7 wins).
2. Wimbledon (5 finals: 2 wins, 3 losses).
Joint 3. Australian Open (2 finals: 1win, 1 loss).
Joint 3. United States Open (2 finals: 1win, 1 loss).
Pretty good draw for Raonic in Shanghai
http://www.atpworldtour.com/posting/2012/5014/mds.pdf
shots at Tsonga, Berdych (QF), Djokovic, Federer (in order)
Haha wow! Massive turnout