The balls in your court.
Banned
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
you heard it here first !
Well, that's quite a sh*t comment. Not to mention irrelevant to anything discussed on this Board. Geez...talk about "dumbest post ever made"...hell, you made it!this is the dumbest post ever made
yes, because retireing at 26 makes alot of sense.... (unless your an ugly french lesbian i'd advise against it)
Well, that's quite a sh*t comment. Not to mention irrelevant to anything discussed on this Board. Geez...talk about "dumbest post ever made"...hell, you made it!
this is the dumbest post ever made
yes, because retireing at 26 makes alot of sense.... (unless your an ugly french lesbian i'd advise against it)
fed's STILL made the FO final
the AO semis
hell, how crazy is everyone when they already are looking for blood
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
Not unheard of - Borg ? Retired after a loss in final of a slam.
If you make a correct prediction please will you retire?
lol, no harm intended, I actually enjoyed the sparring on your Monfils thread.
Exactly!! Theres an old saying:
History Always Repeats Itself
Sure history repeats itself. Take this forum for example.
It has a history of morones starting lame threads to gain attention or to get over their dyspeptic stomach. When you started this thread, history repeated itself.
Full marks to you!
Federer is not into drugs or partying like Borg was. He has nothing else to go to.
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
Where do trolls like this come from?
Is anything you dont agree with a troll comment?
Borg, Henin, Hingis all retired at young ages after losing or about to lose their number one status. Why is drawing an analogy to Federer's situation troll like?
Its unbelievable....I am just making a very logical and rational argument.
bad form dude.....grow up.
Your not making logical and rational comment. All you do is start thread after thread about something negative regarding Federer. If you deny it I will be glad to make a detailed listing of all your posts and threads. They are one track minded hate negative sounding posts and every single one of them always mentions Federer. Kinda pathetic but whatever floats your little boat I guess.
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
I don´t want Federer retires. I want to see him losing to Novak.
Nadal or the joker wins Wimbledon.
you heard it here first !
nanny nanny foo foo......great argument dude.
Borg, Henin, Hingis all retired at young ages after losing or about to lose their number one status.
Exactly!! Theres an old saying:
History Always Repeats Itself
I deserved that!! But in all honesty....I never really thought Monfils would win.....I just figured that if I were right I would look like a genius and if I was wrong no big deal because everyone knew the kid would get the crap kicked out of him.
On the other hand I correctly predicted 4 years ago even before there ever was a Nadal that Federer would never win the French Open because his style of game was wrong. Now that was damn good!
he'll retire if he has like a freak accident where he cant walk anymore, is better wording it!
But that prediction is not true. I think most would agree that although Federer hasn't won and may not win the FO, it's not because of his game. Sure, he is usually too prone to errors with attacking to play his absolute best best on clay, but the fact is that his game hasn't stopped him - Nadal has, 4 times. He may very well have 4 cups in his cabinet if it wasn't for the kid from Mallorca. And that is no djoke.
The only way to predict the future is based on what happens in the past. Is it a sure thing? Of course not ....but there is a pattern.
Players like Federer who domonate for so long and then have a dryspell get burnt out. Thats what happened to Borg, Henin and Hingis.
In fact even guys who were at the top of their game get burnt out like Mcenroe and Wilander.
Mac had the best year of his life and then took a year off to recuperate. Unfortunately he never won a major after the age of 25.
Wilander won three out of four slams and won the fourth actually in doubles at Wimbledon. He burnt out after that and never won another major.
fed is now 26...he is at the age. History may very well repeat itself.
Perhaps I made a mistake by quoting your entire post. I was simply referring to your prediction from 4 years ago, where you said Federer would never win the FO because his game wouldn't let him. I think he's proven he has more than enough game, the greatest of all time on clay is what is stopping him.
Where do trolls like this come from?
ya. from a tennis ball stuffed in my @ss.
He has already lost to both this year!I don't think he'll lose to Novak. Nadal is the only guy that gets under his skin.
What would you do?If I was a moderator...
What would you do?
If I was a moderator...