N
nikdom
Guest
In slam count. Whoever that guy was that had 12 slams. He never gets talked about much does he?
Discuss.
Discuss.
In slam count. Whoever that guy was that had 12 slams. He never gets talked about much does he?
Discuss.
Was Emerson talked about that much before Sampras broke his record? My recollection is that he was talked about only as Sampras was getting close. In any event, Sampras was the year end #1 player for 6 straight years, and arguably played the highest level of grass court tennis, ever. Emerson was never the #1 player.
Are you sayin the slam count didn't matter until Sampras was in possession of the record?
In slam count. Whoever that guy was that had 12 slams. He never gets talked about much does he?
Discuss.
Don't think he'll be forgotten to that extent. At least, not any time soon
Sampras has a few other 'memorable' things going for him... like 7 Wimbledons in 8 years and 6 consecutive year end #1 finishes... that Emerson didn't (no one really cared about 6 Australians, actually not many cared about the Slams record either as all of it was accumulated as an amateur)
Laver hasn't been forgotten... largely because of his Grand Slams
Borg hasn't been forgotten ... largely because of 5 consecutive Wimbys and the odd combo off 6 Frenches to go with it
Don't think Sampras will be anytime soon either, though if Tilden's largely been forgotten, I reckon sooner or later, everyone will be.
Interesting thing is that the guy who had 12 majors didn't even know he had the record. It was Roy Emerson by the way.In slam count. Whoever that guy was that had 12 slams. He never gets talked about much does he?
Discuss.
I agree totally with your last sentence.
Time always has a way of diminishing any player, no matter how great they are to the casual fan. Will people discuss Federer as much 100 years from now when no one has seen him but videos? At least the videos will be better than those of Bill Tilden or Don Budge! Probably some player in the year 2117 will be talked about as far greater than any player in the year 2017 and a lot of it has to do with the fact they never saw Sampras, Federer or any player of today.
Sampras doesn't deserve to be forgotten in the sport of tennis but of course many will grow up and have never heard of him in years to come. That will happen. I'm a baseball fan here in the United States and very few casual fans know of Honus Wagner, the great shortstop of the Pittsburgh Pirates and yet statistically he was the greatest shortstop of all time! Babe Ruth is also a cartoon figure to some today but he was perhaps the greatest baseball player ever.
It's actually shocking that Bill Tilden is still discussed somewhat today considering how long ago he play. How many fans know of how great Bobby Riggs was in his heyday? Most know of him as the guy who lost to Billie Jean King in 1973.
I hope you're right. Actually I'm pretty sure you're right.True fans of a sport should know the big names in its history. Federer will probably be close to MJ levels in terms of admiration in the future so I wouldn't worry about him lol.
It's actually shocking that Bill Tilden is still discussed somewhat today considering how long ago he play. How many fans know of how great Bobby Riggs was in his heyday? Most know of him as the guy who lost to Billie Jean King in 1973.
Great points.Sampras won't be forgotten, mainly due to his 7 Wimbledon titles and 6 YE No 1's. Also arguably the greatest server and grass court player of all time.
I think the fact that Tilden is still discussed nearly 100 years on (obviously not to the degree the current greats are, but to an extent) is actually quite promising - because it means that today's stars, and those of the recent past, will probably still be discussed in 100 years' time. Even if it's only to place them at the tail-end of a top 10 GOAT list with a statement that they "played in a weaker era", lol.
That tells us something about the concept of "majors".Interesting thing is that the guy who had 12 majors didn't even know he had the record. It was Roy Emerson by the way.
That tells us something about the concept of "majors".
That is an interesting perspective. And that could happen to Graf as well because Serena has overshadowed her like Fed overshadowing Sampras.Amongst tennis circles surely not given that he was by far and away the dominant player of the 90s, won so many Wimbledon and US Open titles, had so many weeks and year end finishes as the world no. 1 etc.
But amongst wider circles it is certainly possible. He just never had the global star appeal or X-factor that Borg, Federer or Nadal have had. During his career he wasn't exactly accessible to the media and didn't do much to promote the sport. Borg playing in all those invitationals in practically every corner of the globe was huge for the popularity of the sport (and his own personal popularity). And currently Federer and Nadal promote the sport a lot. Sampras loved winning big titles more than the sport itself, while someone like Federer loves the sport even if he isn't winning majors.
And as others have said since retiring he has distanced himself further the sport, while Laver hasn't. There simply isn't that aura about and reverence towards him as there is for Laver or Borg, and there never will be.
Federer vs Sampras is not the same as Graf vs Williams. Graf is much closer to Serena than Pete to Roger. It is even debatable who is greater between them.That is an interesting perspective. And that could happen to Graf as well because Serena has overshadowed her like Fed overshadowing Sampras.
Are you sayin the slam count didn't matter until Sampras was in possession of the record?
I think regardless of achievement, Sampras will be a forgotten man the more he stays away from the sport. He just didn't give back or show love for Tennis.
Was Emerson talked about that much before Sampras broke his record? My recollection is that he was talked about most as Sampras was getting close to breaking his record. In any event, Sampras was the year end #1 player for 6 straight years, and arguably played the highest level of grass court tennis, ever. Emerson was never the #1 player.
Federer vs Sampras is not the same as Graf vs Williams. Graf is much closer to Serena than Pete to Roger. It is even debatable who is greater between them.
12 majors, never #1...talk about a different era(s)!
12 amateur majors. It's a great record, but, not the same as 12 open majors, although, I think he could have won a few open majors at his best.
doubles was a big thing for him too I believe
just checked, yeah, just 16 doubles majors
McEnroe was really the last of a breed, well maybe Edberg too...guys winning singles and doubles majors, something underrated now
That is an interesting perspective. And that could happen to Graf as well because Serena has overshadowed her like Fed overshadowing Sampras.
As such, yes, but in popular imagination, I believe Serena has already surpassed Graf. But my parallel was based more on the fact that Graf too has stayed away from tennis after retiring. Out of sight ultimately equals out of mind. It's not that it's wrong for Graf to stay away from the limelight since she was always an introvert anyway but that's how the media works.
Amongst tennis circles surely not given that he was by far and away the dominant player of the 90s, won so many Wimbledon and US Open titles, had so many weeks and year end finishes as the world no. 1 etc.
But amongst wider circles it is certainly possible. He just never had the global star appeal or X-factor that Borg, Federer or Nadal have had. During his career he wasn't exactly accessible to the media and didn't do much to promote the sport. Borg playing in all those invitationals in practically every corner of the globe was huge for the popularity of the sport (and his own personal popularity). And currently Federer and Nadal promote the sport a lot. Sampras loved winning big titles more than the sport itself, while someone like Federer loves the sport even if he isn't winning majors.
And as others have said since retiring he has distanced himself further the sport, while Laver hasn't. There simply isn't that aura about and reverence towards him as there is for Laver or Borg, and there never will be.
There just might be other reasons for that...It's actually shocking that Bill Tilden is still discussed somewhat today considering how long ago he play.
Well I'm just talking about his tennis record.There just might be other reasons for that...
That is an interesting perspective. And that could happen to Graf as well because Serena has overshadowed her like Fed overshadowing Sampras.
I wouldn't want to be near that area he puked to.Never, who else can barely stand up, propping themselves up with their racquet and then fire aces between puking.
Few, if any, cared whether Pete won anything on clay especially in the US. Here, the USO and Wimbledon count much more than the FO or AO. I am not in that category, but most here are. The fact that he ended 6 years at #1 and had so many weeks at #1 made him Very popular in the US, despite what some may think. It is natural that Borg, Roger, Rafa would be very popular in Europe, especially since the US dominated tennis just before Borg won his FO and Wimbledon titles, and Roger and Rafa began to dominate. Pete never craved the spotlight off court, so was rarely seen on TV or in the news media. Laver, Agassi, Becker and some others craved attention in the tennis world after they retired. Some performers: sports, music, stage and screen stars can't get off the stage. To each his own.Great champion in the 2 big slams.
Pete will obviously be remembered as a big one but in the last 10 years he has relegated a lot.
Why ?
In my version
- he was not a star (like Djoker and Lendl)
- he missed too much in other big titles and lost too many matches during the year.
In the other versions
- he was not a star (like Djoker and Lendl) and
- he was not winning on clay.
True, but in Sampras' case, he actually competed in doubles but never got anywhere.I think it's easier to be a great doubles player when you are a great serve and volley singles player. In the 60's, many of the top singles players were top doubles players for that reason, in my view.
Sadly Sampras is already being forgotten, heck, Wilson just released a Pro Staff 85 with Federer's face on it instead of Sampras. Federer never won a slam with the 85, shameful they'd do that. Pete Sampras and the Pro Staff 85 are synonymous.
Sadly Sampras is already being forgotten,
Just check the many threads on this very Forum where Sampras is routinely regarded as a tennis non-entity. He's constantly spoken of as "nothing but a servebot." The ignorance is mind boggling.Sorry but the idea of Sampras being 'forgotten' by tennis seems preposterous to me.