DismalFuture
Professional
http://www.sportdw.com/2017/08/dolgopolov-winston-salem-suspicious.html
Is it all over for the girly hair Ukrainian?
Is it all over for the girly hair Ukrainian?
The ATP should have an official who automatically reviews the video of a match with a betting pattern like this. If that official deems the player to have a case to answer re tanking for the purpose of executing a betting sting, he faces charges at a tribunal with his career on the line.
Yeah, the odds were very weird for this match. I'm pretty sure he sold the match and most bookies knew.
My only question is how did the information that the match was fixed leak out (and then spread so fast)? Nobody with a little common sense would bet on Monteiro unless they knew something fishy was gonna happen. Even 1,36 odds on Dolgopolov felt way too high against someone who literally can't play on a hard court at this level.The only way the bookies find out is through an irrational amount of money for one player over another. The victims in this if it was fixed are bookmakers who hold bets on the winner and punters who bet on Dolgopolov unaware he's not trying.
They have the Tennis Integrity Unit. This will be reviewed thoroughly I'm sure.
My only question is how did the information that the match was fixed leak out (and then spread so fast)? Nobody with a little common sense would bet on Monteiro unless they knew something fishy was gonna happen.
My God, I fear for Dolgopolov. One of my favorite players and this could the end of him.
Match fixing should be legal anyway imo. It's Dog's match, his time, he should be allowed to play how he wants. If people are dumb enough to bet wrongly and bookies gullible enough to take certain bets then it's all good to me. No sympathy for those mugs. With the amount earned at the top, it would silly for non mugs to start fixing matches for money.
Match fixing should be legal anyway imo. It's Dog's match, his time, he should be allowed to play how he wants. If people are dumb enough to bet wrongly and bookies gullible enough to take certain bets then it's all good to me. No sympathy for those mugs. With the amount earned at the top, it would silly for non mugs to start fixing matches for money.
Lol how about no
Thats how you turn the ATP World Tour and the sport of tennis into an absolute joke and then 1) no one would pay to watch it, 2) no one would bet on it, and 3) no one would end up playing it because of 1
There is no place for fixing any sporting event
All sports betting should be illegal.Match fixing should be legal anyway imo.
All sports betting should be illegal.
At the end of it all, it's not the bookies that lose. They ALWAYS win. It's the unsuspecting betting public.Of course people will still watch it... hell it probably goes on right now. As long as players aren't shouting about it and keep it under wraps then it's all fair game imo. If bookmakers, (who often prey on weak willed, addicted individuals anyway) fall for players hustle, then it's on them. People for sure will still bet on it... infact it actually adds more spice to betting imo.
All sports betting should be illegal.
All sports betting should be illegal.
They would have no way to get addicted in the first place. They could still go out and lose their money if they want by playing poker, lotto or all sorts of gambling.Get rid of it altogether... hmm another interesting concept. Wonder what the addicts would do then though, lmao.
Not sure of the veracity of this, but here's a comment I found in the comments section of that blog post:
A couple of months ago, I analyzed all ATP main tour matches since 2004. I looked at price drifts of more than 10% from Pinnacle starting price. Then I sorted by player. Guess who's on top of that list...
#1: Alexandr Dolgopolov
The point is there would be a lot more money involved if betting there was legal. More money: more incentive for corruption. Where there is a will, there is a way.That's a disaster for sports like tennis. The biggest illegal sports betting market in the world is cricket betting in India. It made the sport globally rife for corruption. With situations like the Dolgopolov one, registered betting agencies hold bets, with a name attached to the bet. That provides authorities with the starting point for an investigation, making the sport cleaner.
I felt this way about Davydenko. The guy was good enough that there is almost no way the match fixing money could be worth the risk. I wonder in some of these cases if these guys have their safety threatened.It is hard to imagine a talented guy like Dolgopolov bothering to associate with this sort of element. He can have a much better life and earn just as much being an entertainer going deep in lower tier tournaments and making the odd run at bigger tournaments the same way players like Monfils, Kohli etc etc do. He doesn't need to bother with match-fixers.
The point is there would be a lot more money involved if betting there was legal. More money: more incentive for corruption. Where there is a will, there is a way.
You should read this. Davydenko and the Russian mafia were quite clearly linked.I felt this way about Davydenko. The guy was good enough that there is almost no way the match fixing money could be worth the risk. I wonder in some of these cases if these guys have their safety threatened.
Nothing stops organized crime from getting involved in sports betting anywhere in the world.That's not necessarily the case. The volumes of money where betting is illegal can be enormous. Legal betting will involve more people, but usually on a smaller scale. Illegal betting induces organised crime and distorts markets, with the market distortion driving turnover.
I've often wondered about it too, but dismissed match fixing because Dolgo is already quite rich. He's won almost 7 million dollars just on-court and probably twice that off court. He doesn't need to match fix, he's a good enough player to be top 20 for another 2-3 years just with his talent. Sad story if true.I hope it ain't so but I have to admit it would explain a lot about Dolgo's chronic inconsistency and strangely up and down performances.
At the end of it all, it's not the bookies that lose. They ALWAYS win. It's the unsuspecting betting public.
Nothing stops organized crime from getting involved in sports betting anywhere in the world.
?? So you would watch tennis even if it all became a scripted farce? The player's only goal would be not to win, but to make-believe and trick the public?Anyone betting high on tennis is likely playing with some serious fire anyway, especially on unpredictable players like Dolgopolov. I quite like the concept of an anything goes type environment, where fixing is allowed. Bookies will have to think twice on who to trust and what not. Either get rid of betting or go all out in my opinion.
Online betting organisations are themselves quasi-criminal scams.
They refuse to take any further bets from people who have a reasonable track record of winning big.
And they refuse to pay out by hunting through the fine print.
In short, they don't work with the regular percentages of bookmakers. They seek super-profits.
You can still have underground markets and bookies even where betting is legal.That's true, but the scale of their involvement is influenced by transparency. If betting was illegal, nothing untoward would have come to light regarding this Dolgopolov match. With betting fluctuations readily available, It's clearly a match of interest to the authorities. The names of the account holders who bet on Dolgopolov are known, so patterns of those people backing suspicious winners can be tracked. It establishes a starting point for investigation/prosecution. If betting's illegal the fix still happens, none of this sees the light of day, so further fixing happens with impunity.
You can still have underground markets and bookies even where betting is legal.
My concern with match fixing is solely the unsuspecting, genuine betting men losing their money. Those unsuspecting, honest betting men would be much less likely to place their bets with an unregulated, dodgy underground bookie.
No, they won't "seek out someone providing the service they want", not if it means committing a crime and dealing with criminals. They are a lot less likely to get involved at all if it's illegal. That's the whole point.Your honest unsuspecting betting man is unlikely to seek out an underground bookie where legal betting exists and is taxed at a rate low enough so that betting odds are "fair." If that doesn't exist, they'll seek out someone providing the service they want.
You don't actually need a record of winning big to be banned by many online bookmakers. A history of backing market firmers or breaking square on your betting can see an account closed. What use are you to them if you don't lose money?
No, they won't "seek out someone providing the service they want", not if it means committing a crime and dealing with criminals. They are a lot less likely to get involved at all if it's illegal. That's the whole point.
Have you made a comparison of the scale of it all before and after? Today sports betting is a national disease in Australia. It's promoted everywhere, even by sports commentators, and people keep falling for it.You're from Australia. The scale of SP bookmaking in Australia prior to the introduction of the TAB suggests otherwise.
Have you made a comparison of the scale of it all before and after? Today sports betting is a national disease in Australia. It's promoted everywhere, even by sports commentators, and people keep falling for it.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-...-in-one-depressing-chart-20150901-gjd2w1.html