The other day I was listening to a podcast on cities and why people choose/need/forced to live where they do and they were talking about human interest and connectivity and relating it to employment opportunities, population growth and housing prices. Both Sydney and Melbourne are rapidly growing in that 5 million range with Brisbane just over 2 million, Perth just under 2 million. Adelaide at 1.3 with Hobart at 220 thou and Canberra around that figure as well . The two largest cities in population are larger than LA and around that Toronto Canada size with NY at 8 million. Chinese cities as an example their 10th biggest city is just under 8 million people.
My question is what makes a good city for you to live in. I can tell you now that expensive houses and congestion doesn't cut it in. A nice climate, comfortable lifestyle and freedom do. Your thoughts on this topic if you like.
Didn't read all comments but lived or been long enough to answer your question with my take,
Sydney -best city to live with 8 figure income. If you're pay exceeds $1, 000,000 year you can have some of the best location on earth with the benefit of 5 mil population next door.
If you earn 6 figures $200,000 below this is a bad city to live.
Melbourne - they have put all their eggs into the CBD and throttled their mid to outter suburbs. If you can afford anywhere 15 - 20 mins from CBD it's great city otherwise your taxes are going elsewhere. Also good if your into AFL. But need to be on public tram route. Crap weather. Need mid 6 figure salary
Adelaide - It's like Melbourne but on a budget. Had nearly everything Melbourne had but cheaper. This is best city for educated service workers. Unfortunately it's losing its lower to middle income sector with closures of manufacturing and no resource section spending.
Brisbane - its weird city mainly because there are areas north and south that are premium. Topography really stuff this city up. I find it strange because of layout and the population spread along the sea board.
Perth - mining and mining support. Nothing else to say this city flutated on resource sector and FIFO. Boom and bust. Kind of another country in outlook. I rarely been there but from what I heard because $$$ in boom can be good
Tassdi - only visited. Lovely place with economic and environmental constraints. It's one of those places where if you can get good $ and like nature and hells cold is good. I like Tassi but it's hard to get good paying work.
Darwin - Don't like it To bloody humid and cyclones come through too often. I can think of many small towns that are better. I work for Darwin based company and the turn over of middle to upper managements is high. Weather good for 8-9 month but hell otherwise. Can think of large towns north of Capricorn that are better
ACT - meh its government If you're not government then better places to be.
So
Depends on what you do and income level. Generally speaking the big cities are only ok if you earn top $, if you work in resources or support your location will be predetermined to a degree. Aust smaller cities area generally better for middle income workers. Big cities make middle income look average If your uneducated work in small cities can be hard to find so maybe bigger cities way to go. In my book if your middle or lower management or income Adelaide and larger non capitals are better.